Jessica ❁ ➳ Silverbow ➳ ❁ 's Reviews > Me Before You
Me Before You (Me Before You, #1)
by
by
Jessica ❁ ➳ Silverbow ➳ ❁ 's review
bookshelves: darrrrrrrk, romance, it-burns-us-precious, jerk-of-my-dreams, kickass-heroines, what-the-hype, convoluted-plans, i-cried
Feb 17, 2016
bookshelves: darrrrrrrk, romance, it-burns-us-precious, jerk-of-my-dreams, kickass-heroines, what-the-hype, convoluted-plans, i-cried
SO. I know that practically the whole world loves this book, and I'm not trying to undermine the majority. Truly, I'm not. I've said it before, and I'll say it again, the biggest (only?) downside to training yourself to read books critically for review, is that you can't turn it off. I may never be able to devour a book, paying zero attention to anything but how it makes me feel, and enjoying it without any kind of expectations ever again.
That probably sounds awful to a lot a people, but I don't mind. I might even prefer it this way.
But hopefully, you now feel sorry for me, horrified by analytical approach to reading-for-pleasure, and no longer want to tar and feather me for besmirching the honor of one of your best loved books. *crosses fingers*
I have three main issues:
1. The unequal cost vs. gain ratio.
I won't try to deny that the conclusion of ME BEFORE YOU packed a powerful emotional punch.
BUT.
My tears weren't the result of pain felt on behalf of poignant characters who had been brought to life by a talented writer.
The situation was tragic, so I felt pain.
BUT.
No more or less than I would have felt if I'd read the same scenario in a book summary or a 500 word article in the local paper.
I could try to isolate reasons for the disconnect, like it's told in the third person, but that feels like a cop-out--I've encountered plenty of compelling characters in third person POV books--but ultimately, Will and Lou didn't join those ranks.
The end.
2. Gratuitous use of personal tragedy to justify behavior that didn't need justification.
Moyes took what would have been the most interesting aspect of this tale (Lou's quirky fashion sense), and turned it into coping mechanism.
I'm usually all for gaining insight into characters, but that insight needs to be meaningful. Turning a young woman with a colorful and unapologetically wacky fashion sense into a victim, who is merely trying to disguise her femininity is . . .
Well, it's offensive.
It suggests that you must be damaged to escape conformity, that you can't be an individual for the sake of individuality, or simply b/c YOU'RE DIFFERENT.
3. Postmodernism makes my nostrils flare.
ME BEFORE YOU is a dispiriting combination of selfishness and pointlessness masquerading as a love story.
I've frequently addressed my feelings on Postmodernism, so I won't reiterate the long version here, but suffice it to say, I HATE it.
I hate the inevitability of pain and disappointment and of mediocrity. I hate the implication that Bad Things will happen, so the best you can do is bear it gracefully, or, at the very least, with stoicism.
Reality is something I avoid when reading recreationally, so encountering the kind of inescapable sadness and loss often found in Postmodern literature is something I assiduously steer clear of.
Sometimes with limited success . . .
If you share my view, do yourself a favor and skip this one. In my opinion, ME BEFORE YOU is a headache you don't need.
The only part of the story that didn't shriek of the uselessness of hope in the face of reality, was Lou's personal growth throughout her endeavor, which annoyingly makes me want to read AFTER YOU to see if the changes stuck, and will almost certainly be another disappointment.
Ugh.
My review of After You
That probably sounds awful to a lot a people, but I don't mind. I might even prefer it this way.
But hopefully, you now feel sorry for me, horrified by analytical approach to reading-for-pleasure, and no longer want to tar and feather me for besmirching the honor of one of your best loved books. *crosses fingers*
I have three main issues:
1. The unequal cost vs. gain ratio.
I won't try to deny that the conclusion of ME BEFORE YOU packed a powerful emotional punch.
BUT.
My tears weren't the result of pain felt on behalf of poignant characters who had been brought to life by a talented writer.
The situation was tragic, so I felt pain.
BUT.
No more or less than I would have felt if I'd read the same scenario in a book summary or a 500 word article in the local paper.
I could try to isolate reasons for the disconnect, like it's told in the third person, but that feels like a cop-out--I've encountered plenty of compelling characters in third person POV books--but ultimately, Will and Lou didn't join those ranks.
The end.
2. Gratuitous use of personal tragedy to justify behavior that didn't need justification.
Moyes took what would have been the most interesting aspect of this tale (Lou's quirky fashion sense), and turned it into coping mechanism.
I'm usually all for gaining insight into characters, but that insight needs to be meaningful. Turning a young woman with a colorful and unapologetically wacky fashion sense into a victim, who is merely trying to disguise her femininity is . . .
Well, it's offensive.
It suggests that you must be damaged to escape conformity, that you can't be an individual for the sake of individuality, or simply b/c YOU'RE DIFFERENT.
3. Postmodernism makes my nostrils flare.
ME BEFORE YOU is a dispiriting combination of selfishness and pointlessness masquerading as a love story.
I've frequently addressed my feelings on Postmodernism, so I won't reiterate the long version here, but suffice it to say, I HATE it.
I hate the inevitability of pain and disappointment and of mediocrity. I hate the implication that Bad Things will happen, so the best you can do is bear it gracefully, or, at the very least, with stoicism.
Reality is something I avoid when reading recreationally, so encountering the kind of inescapable sadness and loss often found in Postmodern literature is something I assiduously steer clear of.
Sometimes with limited success . . .
If you share my view, do yourself a favor and skip this one. In my opinion, ME BEFORE YOU is a headache you don't need.
The only part of the story that didn't shriek of the uselessness of hope in the face of reality, was Lou's personal growth throughout her endeavor, which annoyingly makes me want to read AFTER YOU to see if the changes stuck, and will almost certainly be another disappointment.
Ugh.
My review of After You
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Me Before You.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
February 17, 2016
– Shelved
July 3, 2016
–
Started Reading
July 3, 2016
–
Finished Reading
Comments Showing 1-40 of 40 (40 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Victoria
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Jul 21, 2016 05:29AM
If you are wanting to read After You for the reasons mentioned I think you should skip it then. :) Loved your review and totally agree.
reply
|
flag
I am given to understand that After You was indeed a disappointment, so my recommendation is to skip it! (I'm obviously following my own advice, lol.)
Victoria wrote: "If you are wanting to read After You for the reasons mentioned I think you should skip it then. :) Loved your review and totally agree."
Only time will tell about AFTER YOU. ;) Thanks, Victoria!
Only time will tell about AFTER YOU. ;) Thanks, Victoria!
Minna wrote: "I am given to understand that After You was indeed a disappointment, so my recommendation is to skip it! (I'm obviously following my own advice, lol.)"
I'm undecided. This sort of thing doesn't happen very often (I don't like the book that everyone else LOVES, then they almost universally don't like whatever comes next), but when it does, I almost always really like the second installment: if the majority who liked something I was unimpressed with, don't like something else, their dislike is kind of a recommendation. ;)
I'm undecided. This sort of thing doesn't happen very often (I don't like the book that everyone else LOVES, then they almost universally don't like whatever comes next), but when it does, I almost always really like the second installment: if the majority who liked something I was unimpressed with, don't like something else, their dislike is kind of a recommendation. ;)
Keep your review senses on. Books can still be good, even when you are looking at them with a critical eye.
Jessica ❁ Far Dareis Mai ❁ Rabid Reads wrote: "Minna wrote: "I am given to understand that After You was indeed a disappointment, so my recommendation is to skip it! (I'm obviously following my own advice, lol.)"
I'm undecided. This sort of th..."
I myself was lukewarm on Me Before You, as I tend to dislike books that set out to make you cry/have a strong emotional reaction. I didn't much care for any of the characters in Me Before You - the book- either. I picked it up following seeing the movie with some girlfriends, and because my boss waxed poetic about how much more wonderful the book was (than the movie) I thought I'd give it a try. Eh. It was all right. Perhaps the movie was only made decent for me because ofFinnick Sam Claflin, whom I find irresistible. Actually I thought that Emilia Clarke made a little too abundant use of her eyebrows as an acting tool in the movie, to the point that it was distracting to watch - but that's just me.
As a book in itself, it was okay, but taking into consideration all the hype, I expected more I suppose. I appreciated the book more for the issues it raised, which are serious, than for its literary merits. You may enjoy After You after all, so if you're tempted, go for it! Don't let your peanut gallery change your mind ;)
I'm undecided. This sort of th..."
I myself was lukewarm on Me Before You, as I tend to dislike books that set out to make you cry/have a strong emotional reaction. I didn't much care for any of the characters in Me Before You - the book- either. I picked it up following seeing the movie with some girlfriends, and because my boss waxed poetic about how much more wonderful the book was (than the movie) I thought I'd give it a try. Eh. It was all right. Perhaps the movie was only made decent for me because of
As a book in itself, it was okay, but taking into consideration all the hype, I expected more I suppose. I appreciated the book more for the issues it raised, which are serious, than for its literary merits. You may enjoy After You after all, so if you're tempted, go for it! Don't let your peanut gallery change your mind ;)
Amazing review, Jessica! I completely agree with you in the first two issues :)
Laura wrote: "Keep your review senses on. Books can still be good, even when you are looking at them with a critical eye."
Yeah, I'm pretty sure somewhere in all of that^^^ I said I prefer to read critically . . .
Yeah, I'm pretty sure somewhere in all of that^^^ I said I prefer to read critically . . .
Minna wrote: "...but taking into consideration all the hype, I expected more I suppose...."
Exactly. ;)
Exactly. ;)
Charity wrote: "English major brain did that to me too. It's annoying. Great review, though,"
Thank you!
Thank you!
Lucila wrote: "Amazing review, Jessica! I completely agree with you in the first two issues :)"
*high fives* Thanks, Lucila!
*high fives* Thanks, Lucila!
Carmen wrote: "Great review. I rated this the same. You make good points."
Thanks, Carmen! Always nice to find another voice of dissent. ;)
Thanks, Carmen! Always nice to find another voice of dissent. ;)
Allison wrote: "I feel the same way about postmodernism - thanks for the heads up!"
*high fives* Anytime, dollface! I just happy not to be alone in my hatred of Postmodernism. ;)
*high fives* Anytime, dollface! I just happy not to be alone in my hatred of Postmodernism. ;)
Reality is something I avoid when reading recreationally, so encountering the kind of inescapable sadness and loss often found in Postmodern literature is something I assiduously steer clear of.
Sometimes with limited success . . .
I knew I adore you for some logical reason as well, not only just because you are awesome! Love the review, agree with all of your points, but have not read the book to actually express an opinion... However, reading this, i will most probably just skip it:) Thanks, Jess!
Sometimes with limited success . . .
I knew I adore you for some logical reason as well, not only just because you are awesome! Love the review, agree with all of your points, but have not read the book to actually express an opinion... However, reading this, i will most probably just skip it:) Thanks, Jess!
Thank you, thank you, thank you, for being the first person I know who has read it and pointed out #3. Not even my mother! I loved the book until the end and then I hated it. I felt so torn because of that. Thank you for the review!
I'm a permanent resident of the unimpressed by this book camp. Does this mean I get to join your coven, Jessica? ^.^ :3
I agree with your critical analysis. I found this book a Deby Downer in a I read the newspaper cover-to-cover and am feeling hopeless and slightly existential way.
Another thing that bothered me endlessly about Will and Lou was Will foisting his music and movie preferences in such a condescending I'm giving this meek mouse a personality makeover way. No, just no.
Sorry for the long essay. What I really wanted to say was that there is a fair chance that you would like After You. Minus a few glaring cliches, I found it a comparatively better read. I would love to hear your views on After You.
I agree with your critical analysis. I found this book a Deby Downer in a I read the newspaper cover-to-cover and am feeling hopeless and slightly existential way.
Another thing that bothered me endlessly about Will and Lou was Will foisting his music and movie preferences in such a condescending I'm giving this meek mouse a personality makeover way. No, just no.
Sorry for the long essay. What I really wanted to say was that there is a fair chance that you would like After You. Minus a few glaring cliches, I found it a comparatively better read. I would love to hear your views on After You.
Choko wrote: "Reality is something I avoid when reading recreationally, so encountering the kind of inescapable sadness and loss often found in Postmodern literature is something I assiduously steer clear of.
S..."
You don't have to read a book to agree with the sentiments. ;) Thanks, Choko! (PS - I know I still owe you PM, and I'm working on it. Sucks to write about sucky things :/ )
S..."
You don't have to read a book to agree with the sentiments. ;) Thanks, Choko! (PS - I know I still owe you PM, and I'm working on it. Sucks to write about sucky things :/ )
Stephanie wrote: "Yes, absolutely. I wish I had skipped this book. I was actually mad about it for weeks!"
If I hadn't been at the beach, I probably would've stayed mad for weeks, too. ;)
If I hadn't been at the beach, I probably would've stayed mad for weeks, too. ;)
Elizabeth wrote: "Thank you, thank you, thank you, for being the first person I know who has read it and pointed out #3. Not even my mother! I loved the book until the end and then I hated it. I felt so torn because..."
I couldn't believe it. Then I could. But I was pissed about it. I had somehow managed to remain completely ignorant of the plot , beyond the fact that he was in a wheelchair, but the rest of it? Total shock. *shakes head* I don't need that aggravation. *wails*
I couldn't believe it. Then I could. But I was pissed about it. I had somehow managed to remain completely ignorant of the plot , beyond the fact that he was in a wheelchair, but the rest of it? Total shock. *shakes head* I don't need that aggravation. *wails*
Books are TARDIS wrote: "I'm a permanent resident of the unimpressed by this book camp. Does this mean I get to join your coven, Jessica? ^.^ :3
I agree with your critical analysis. I found this book a Deby Downer in a I..."
Yeah, his methods were a bit . . . superior, but he broadened her horizons so much that it didn't bother me too much. Honestly, I cut the guy all kinds of slack, b/c REASONS. *shrugs awkwardly*
And I lived AFTER YOU. Will post soon. ;)
I agree with your critical analysis. I found this book a Deby Downer in a I..."
Yeah, his methods were a bit . . . superior, but he broadened her horizons so much that it didn't bother me too much. Honestly, I cut the guy all kinds of slack, b/c REASONS. *shrugs awkwardly*
And I lived AFTER YOU. Will post soon. ;)
IM211 wrote: "thank u! i found someone who agrees with me!!! I felt more or less the same sentiments towards it!"
*high fives* You're not alone. ;)
*high fives* You're not alone. ;)
ALSO, Books are TARDIS wrote: "I agree with your critical analysis. I found this book a Deby Downer in a I read the newspaper cover-to-cover and am feeling hopeless and slightly existential way..."
That's bloody brilliant. And EXACTLY what I was feeling. *tips hat*
That's bloody brilliant. And EXACTLY what I was feeling. *tips hat*
Hi :) I am on page 329 now and I can't really feel the excitement everybody seems to feel when reading it. So I looked at the reviews here and it's so hard to find someone who has a critical view on it. So I really have to thank you! Because now I don't feel like a total stranger not getting heart-shaped eyes reading this book. And by the way; I like your way of reviewing!
#1 "The situation was tragic, so I felt pain. " so true, felt the same, I even dislike Lou most of the time but I felt sad just because od the situation
Choko wrote: "As long as you are OK, I am good, girlfriend! :):):) Good to see you writing reviews again:):):)"
😘
😘
Bowserella wrote: "Hi :) I am on page 329 now and I can't really feel the excitement everybody seems to feel when reading it. So I looked at the reviews here and it's so hard to find someone who has a critical view o..."
Yeah, it's awkward when you're watching the hype through panes of glass, but unable to touch it. You keep wondering what you're missing, if you're reading wrong . . .?
No. You're not. And I'm immensely pleased that I helped you realize that. And thank you 👭😘
Yeah, it's awkward when you're watching the hype through panes of glass, but unable to touch it. You keep wondering what you're missing, if you're reading wrong . . .?
No. You're not. And I'm immensely pleased that I helped you realize that. And thank you 👭😘