Loren's Reviews > Neuromancer
Neuromancer (Sprawl, #1)
by
by
** spoiler alert **
Adapted from ISawLightningFall.blogspot.com
The first time I tried to read Neuromancer, I stopped around page 25.
I was about 15 years old and I’d heard it was a classic, a must-read from 1984. So I picked it up and I plowed through the first chapter, scratching my head the whole time. Then I shoved it onto my bookshelf, where it was quickly forgotten. It was a dense, multilayered read, requiring more effort than a hormone-addled adolescent wanted to give. But few years later, I pulled the book down and gave it another chance. This time, William Gibson’s dystopic rabbit hole swallowed me whole.
Neuromancer is basically a futuristic crime caper. The main character is Case, a burnt-out hacker, a cyberthief. When the book opens, a disgruntled employer has irrevocably destroyed parts of his nervous system with a mycotoxin, meaning he can’t jack into the matrix, an abstract representation of earth’s computer network. Then he receives a suspiciously sweet offer: A mysterious employer will fix him up if he’ll sign on for a special job. He cautiously agrees and finds himself joined by a schizophrenic ex-Special Forces colonel; a perverse performance artist who wrecks havoc with his holographic imaginings; a long-dead mentor whose personality has been encoded as a ROM construct; and a nubile mercenary with silver lenses implanted over her eyes, retractable razors beneath her fingernails and one heckuva chip on her shoulder. Case soon learns that the target he’s supposed to crack and his employer and are one and the same -- an artificial intelligence named Wintermute.
Unlike most crime thrillers and many works of speculative fiction, Neuromancer is interested in a whole lot more that plot development. Gibson famously coined the word “cyberspace” and he imagines a world where continents are ruled more by corporations and crime syndicates than nations, where cultural trends both ancient and modern dwell side by side, where high-tech and biotech miracles are as ordinary as air. On one page you’ll find a discussion of nerve splicing, on another a description of an open-air market in Istanbul. An African sailor with tribal scars on his face might meet a Japanese corporate drone implanted with microprocessors, the better to measure the mutagen in his bloodstream. When he’s not plumbing the future, Gibson dips into weighty themes such as the nature of love, what drives people toward self-destruction and mind/body dualism. It’s a rich, heady blend.
That complexity translates over to the novel’s prose style, which is why I suspect my first effort to read it failed. Gibson peppers his paragraphs with allusions to Asian geography and Rastafarianism, computer programming and corporate finance. He writes about subjects ranging from drug addiction and zero-gravity physics to synesthesia and brutal back-alley violence. And he writes with next to no exposition. You aren’t told that Case grew up in the Sprawl, which is the nickname for the Boston-Atlanta Metropolitan Axis, a concreted strip of the Eastern Seaboard, and that he began training in Miami to become a cowboy, which is slang for a cyberspace hacker, and that he was immensely skilled at it, et cetera, et cetera. No, you’re thrust right into Case’s shoes as he swills rice beer in Japan and pops amphetamines and tries to con the underworld in killing him when his back is turned because he thinks he’ll never work again. You have to piece together the rest on your own.
Challenging? You bet. But it’s electrifying once you get it.
I’ve worked by paperback copy until the spine and cover have split, until the pages have faded like old newsprint. Echoes of its diction sound in my own writing. Thoughts of Chiba City or BAMA pop into my head when I walk through the mall and hear a mélange of voices speaking in Spanish and English and Creole and German. Neuromancer is in me like a tea bag, flavoring my life, and I can’t imagine what it would be like if I hadn’t pressed on into page 26.
The first time I tried to read Neuromancer, I stopped around page 25.
I was about 15 years old and I’d heard it was a classic, a must-read from 1984. So I picked it up and I plowed through the first chapter, scratching my head the whole time. Then I shoved it onto my bookshelf, where it was quickly forgotten. It was a dense, multilayered read, requiring more effort than a hormone-addled adolescent wanted to give. But few years later, I pulled the book down and gave it another chance. This time, William Gibson’s dystopic rabbit hole swallowed me whole.
Neuromancer is basically a futuristic crime caper. The main character is Case, a burnt-out hacker, a cyberthief. When the book opens, a disgruntled employer has irrevocably destroyed parts of his nervous system with a mycotoxin, meaning he can’t jack into the matrix, an abstract representation of earth’s computer network. Then he receives a suspiciously sweet offer: A mysterious employer will fix him up if he’ll sign on for a special job. He cautiously agrees and finds himself joined by a schizophrenic ex-Special Forces colonel; a perverse performance artist who wrecks havoc with his holographic imaginings; a long-dead mentor whose personality has been encoded as a ROM construct; and a nubile mercenary with silver lenses implanted over her eyes, retractable razors beneath her fingernails and one heckuva chip on her shoulder. Case soon learns that the target he’s supposed to crack and his employer and are one and the same -- an artificial intelligence named Wintermute.
Unlike most crime thrillers and many works of speculative fiction, Neuromancer is interested in a whole lot more that plot development. Gibson famously coined the word “cyberspace” and he imagines a world where continents are ruled more by corporations and crime syndicates than nations, where cultural trends both ancient and modern dwell side by side, where high-tech and biotech miracles are as ordinary as air. On one page you’ll find a discussion of nerve splicing, on another a description of an open-air market in Istanbul. An African sailor with tribal scars on his face might meet a Japanese corporate drone implanted with microprocessors, the better to measure the mutagen in his bloodstream. When he’s not plumbing the future, Gibson dips into weighty themes such as the nature of love, what drives people toward self-destruction and mind/body dualism. It’s a rich, heady blend.
That complexity translates over to the novel’s prose style, which is why I suspect my first effort to read it failed. Gibson peppers his paragraphs with allusions to Asian geography and Rastafarianism, computer programming and corporate finance. He writes about subjects ranging from drug addiction and zero-gravity physics to synesthesia and brutal back-alley violence. And he writes with next to no exposition. You aren’t told that Case grew up in the Sprawl, which is the nickname for the Boston-Atlanta Metropolitan Axis, a concreted strip of the Eastern Seaboard, and that he began training in Miami to become a cowboy, which is slang for a cyberspace hacker, and that he was immensely skilled at it, et cetera, et cetera. No, you’re thrust right into Case’s shoes as he swills rice beer in Japan and pops amphetamines and tries to con the underworld in killing him when his back is turned because he thinks he’ll never work again. You have to piece together the rest on your own.
Challenging? You bet. But it’s electrifying once you get it.
I’ve worked by paperback copy until the spine and cover have split, until the pages have faded like old newsprint. Echoes of its diction sound in my own writing. Thoughts of Chiba City or BAMA pop into my head when I walk through the mall and hear a mélange of voices speaking in Spanish and English and Creole and German. Neuromancer is in me like a tea bag, flavoring my life, and I can’t imagine what it would be like if I hadn’t pressed on into page 26.
Sign into Goodreads to see if any of your friends have read
Neuromancer.
Sign In »
Reading Progress
Started Reading
January 1, 1993
–
Finished Reading
January 30, 2008
– Shelved
Comments Showing 1-38 of 38 (38 new)
date
newest »
message 1:
by
Chris
(new)
-
rated it 5 stars
Aug 17, 2008 08:54AM
I did the same thing. I was struggling and attempting to read a book that I could not wrap my head around. I picked it back up in college and read it in three days. I promptly went out and got the rest of the series.
reply
|
flag
I was also a fool at 15 that put the book down after my dad bought it for me. Wasn't sure what the hell I was reading. Better late than never, now I love it.
The same thing happened to me. I put the book down during high school but was reintroduced to it during a college Science Fiction class. It is amazing.
I read part of the book for my 1st year English class. I didn't like it back then. Years later, I stumbled upon it again. I might have to finish reading it after seeing this well-written review.
Same. I picked it up at least five different times from around age 15, and never made it even a quarter through. I finally finished it today at 23.
Anyway, great review. Spot-on. The cover quote describes it as a "mindbender of a read," but "mindfuck" is more like it. It's almost like an entirely different form of media...not a comic book, not a book, not a movie...something else that makes my brain all tingly.
Anyway, great review. Spot-on. The cover quote describes it as a "mindbender of a read," but "mindfuck" is more like it. It's almost like an entirely different form of media...not a comic book, not a book, not a movie...something else that makes my brain all tingly.
Same here! I blame parents who assume that science fiction is "for kids." This was far more complicated a book than I could handle in high school. And boy, and I glad I returned to it.
Gibson is honored by your penetrating short review. He in turn honors the reader by not "explaining" - his lack of exposition makes the reader work to completely "get it". But something occurs to me - great works sometimes are published with annotations - surely Neuromancer qualifies for such treatment? And you, Mr. Eaton, would the man for the job. What do you think?
Jim wrote: "Gibson is honored by your penetrating short review. He in turn honors the reader by not "explaining" - his lack of exposition makes the reader work to completely "get it". But something occurs to m..."
Alas, Jim, someone that the University of Wisconsin beat me to it! http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/science_fi...
Alas, Jim, someone that the University of Wisconsin beat me to it! http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/science_fi...
Thanks to your review I can find the strength to continue with it (I am currently just over halfway through)...I know there is something there to get and it is an exhilerating read but, as someone who usually chooses prose that flows and who received this from my boyfriend as an extra birthday gift and feels like I should 'get' what he obv got from it, it is not a usual choice for me but that gives me all the more reason to persevere, I suppose! Thanks to this thought and your thorough appreciation, I will go forth!
Sarah, you might try reading "Johnny Mnemonic" in Gibson's Burning Chrome first. It's a short story set in the same universe, and it'll give you a feel for his writing without having to slog through the length of the novel first.
I quit reading it years ago after being told it was great, after reading your review I'll try again! and will make sure I get past page 25 :)
Maybe it's time to give it another read... I initially thought it to be rather... Meh... Perhaps I should read it in a nice quiet place and not on the train on my way to work
Maybe it's time to give it another read... I initially thought it to be rather... Meh... Perhaps I should read it in a nice quiet place and not on the train on my way to work
Loren,
Good Advice to read JM in Burning Chrome.
I'll admit, I only made it all the way through Lord of the Rings on the 3rd try. I now recommend that folks read The Hobbit before taking on LOTR.
(of course we'll soon get to see Part 1/3 of the film treatment)
Good Advice to read JM in Burning Chrome.
I'll admit, I only made it all the way through Lord of the Rings on the 3rd try. I now recommend that folks read The Hobbit before taking on LOTR.
(of course we'll soon get to see Part 1/3 of the film treatment)
Great review. I got through the first 3 chapters and had no idea what I just read. I'll have to give it another go. It's been years since my first try reading it.
I am completely in love with the Matrix and would love to see more things like it (see) Ready Player One. This book had terms that kept tripping me up. I wish they had a glossary for me, to help me understand some of the terms. He seems to jump around alot so I am really having a hard time figuring out what is happening. I will reread it again until I get it. but it is a very hard read :)
the scene where someone uses a snake and a scorpion to show he is injecting a needle is just 1 thing that really threw me. Gibson has a tendency to think the reader is smarter than we are. In this age of explaining every detail it can be hard to follow something that just happens.
Jimmy wrote: "the scene where someone uses a snake and a scorpion to show he is injecting a needle is just 1 thing that really through me. Gibson has a tendency to think the reader is smarter than we are. In t..."
Yeah, that's a weird scene, as is most everything with Riviera. There's a part where one of the characters (I think it's Molly) mentions that Riviera has implants that cause others to have hallucinations. He's making everyone see the scorpion rather than the needle. If you miss that little explanation (which is remarkably easy to do), the entire thing reads like so much gibberish. Here's a good study guide that might help (https://public.wsu.edu/~brians/scienc...).
Yeah, that's a weird scene, as is most everything with Riviera. There's a part where one of the characters (I think it's Molly) mentions that Riviera has implants that cause others to have hallucinations. He's making everyone see the scorpion rather than the needle. If you miss that little explanation (which is remarkably easy to do), the entire thing reads like so much gibberish. Here's a good study guide that might help (https://public.wsu.edu/~brians/scienc...).
I've loved it since I first read it in high school (in the early 90's) :D But I've had friends that I've recommended it to and they haven't finished it :/
I love how he uses his own jargon right from the start without really explaining it, as if it's normal everyday language, and you just have to keep reading until you figure it out and it makes sense. I think I probably re-read it as soon as I finished it for the first time. By reading it, you're learning how to read it, like a new language :P
I love how he uses his own jargon right from the start without really explaining it, as if it's normal everyday language, and you just have to keep reading until you figure it out and it makes sense. I think I probably re-read it as soon as I finished it for the first time. By reading it, you're learning how to read it, like a new language :P
You're absolutely right, Pantha. Context is key in understanding what the heck is going on with "Neuromancer." That's why multiple readings of it help.
Hi there, I'm writing from the BBC World Service Book club in London. We are interviewing William Gibson about Neuromancer and I wondered if any delightful Goodreaders might have a question about the book which they would like us to ask him? If anyone is interested please email me at ruth.sanderson@bbc.co.uk thanks! R
Ruthie1983 wrote: "Hi there, I'm writing from the BBC World Service Book club in London. We are interviewing William Gibson about Neuromancer and I wondered if any delightful Goodreaders might have a question about t..."
Thanks for dropping by, Ruth! I just emailed you with a question of my own.
Thanks for dropping by, Ruth! I just emailed you with a question of my own.
Naomi wrote: "Awesome review! Might just have to try reading it now."
Glad you liked it, Naomi! It's definitely worth your time, as is "Count Zero," its sequel.
Glad you liked it, Naomi! It's definitely worth your time, as is "Count Zero," its sequel.
And Mona Lisa Overdrive, the final part of the trilogy. The writing just gets better and better, but Neuromancer is still my fave.
Pantha wrote: "And Mona Lisa Overdrive, the final part of the trilogy. The writing just gets better and better, but Neuromancer is still my fave."
Honestly, I didn't like "Mona Lisa Overdrive" very much. The ending felt forced with a big twist as related to an A.I. and the reappearance of Molly was just ... odd.
"Neuromancer" is definitely the best, though.
Honestly, I didn't like "Mona Lisa Overdrive" very much. The ending felt forced with a big twist as related to an A.I. and the reappearance of Molly was just ... odd.
"Neuromancer" is definitely the best, though.
Daniel wrote: "Great review! You've gotten me pretty excited about this book."
Thanks! Let me know how you end up liking it.
Thanks! Let me know how you end up liking it.
Dude...I had to force myself to continue to read it. I wanted to put it down, but managed to stick it out. Left me wondering if I was just not intelligent enough to get it? LOL...Great Review.
Michael wrote: "Dude...I had to force myself to continue to read it. I wanted to put it down, but managed to stick it out. Left me wondering if I was just not intelligent enough to get it? LOL...Great Review."
It doesn't have ANYTHING to do with smarts, man. Gibson is just a really, really dense writer. Not exactly a beach read. But I'm glad you liked it!
It doesn't have ANYTHING to do with smarts, man. Gibson is just a really, really dense writer. Not exactly a beach read. But I'm glad you liked it!
I'm struggling with it right now. On the verge of putting it down. Encouraging review, I'll persist a while longer.
My main problem is it is I dislike all the characters so much. I don't want to spend time with them.
My main problem is it is I dislike all the characters so much. I don't want to spend time with them.
Greg wrote: "I'm struggling with it right now. On the verge of putting it down. Encouraging review, I'll persist a while longer.
My main problem is it is I dislike all the characters so much. I don't want to ..."
That's a fair complaint. The book is full of noir archetypes. The bad guys are bad and the good guys are, too.
My main problem is it is I dislike all the characters so much. I don't want to ..."
That's a fair complaint. The book is full of noir archetypes. The bad guys are bad and the good guys are, too.
'Neuromancer is in me like a tea bag, flavoring my life'
Couldn't be a less cyberpunk-style simile, rather wonderful though.
Couldn't be a less cyberpunk-style simile, rather wonderful though.