ਫਰਮਾ:Grading scheme

WikiProject article quality grading scheme

Class	Criteria	Reader's experience	Editing suggestions	Example
FA	The article has attained featured article status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured article candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured article criteria:ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:Featured article criteria	Professional, outstanding, and thorough; a definitive source for encyclopedic information.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available; further improvements to the prose quality are often possible.	Cleopatra (as of June 2018)
FL	The article has attained featured list status by passing an in-depth examination by impartial reviewers from WP:Featured list candidates. More detailed criteria The article meets the featured list criteria:ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:Featured list criteria	Professional standard; it comprehensively covers the defined scope, usually providing a complete set of items, and has annotations that provide useful and appropriate information about those items.	No further content additions should be necessary unless new information becomes available.	List of dates predicted for apocalyptic events (as of May 2018)
A	The article is well organized and essentially complete, having been examined by impartial reviewers from a WikiProject or elsewhere. Good article status is not a requirement for A-Class. More detailed criteria The article meets the A-Class criteria: ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:Content assessment/A-Class criteria	Very useful to readers. A fairly complete treatment of the subject. A non-expert in the subject would typically find nothing wanting.	Expert knowledge may be needed to tweak the article, and style problems may need solving. WP:Peer review may help.	Battle of Nam River (as of June 2014)
GA	The article meets all of the good article criteria, and has been examined by one or more impartial reviewers from WP:Good article nominations. More detailed criteria ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:Good article criteria	Useful to nearly all readers, with no obvious problems; approaching (though not necessarily equalling) the quality of a professional publication.	Some editing by subject and style experts is helpful; comparison with an existing featured article on a similar topic may highlight areas where content is weak or missing.	Discovery of the neutron (as of April 2019)
B	The article meets all of the B-Class criteria. It is mostly complete and does not have major problems, but requires some further work to reach good article standards. More detailed criteria ਵਿਕੀਪੀਡੀਆ:Content assessment/B-Class criteria	Readers are not left wanting, although the content may not be complete enough to satisfy a serious student or researcher.	A few aspects of content and style need to be addressed. Expert knowledge may be needed. The inclusion of supporting materials should be considered if practical, and the article checked for general compliance with the Manual of Style and related style guidelines.	Human (as of April 2019)
C	The article is substantial but is still missing important content or contains irrelevant material. The article should have some references to reliable sources, but may still have significant problems or require substantial cleanup. More detailed criteria The article cites more than one reliable source and is better developed in style, structure, and quality than Start-Class, but it fails one or more of the criteria for B-Class. It may have some gaps or missing elements, or need editing for clarity, balance, or flow.	Useful to a casual reader, but would not provide a complete picture for even a moderately detailed study.	Considerable editing is needed to close gaps in content and solve cleanup problems.	Wing (as of June 2018)
Start	An article that is developing but still quite incomplete. It may or may not cite adequate reliable sources. More detailed criteria The article has a meaningful amount of good content, but it is still weak in many areas. The article has one or more of the following: A useful picture or graphic Multiple links that help explain or illustrate the topic A subheading that fully treats an element of the topic Multiple subheadings that indicate material that could be added to complete the article	Provides some meaningful content, but most readers will need more.	Providing references to reliable sources should come first; the article also needs substantial improvement in content and organisation. Also improve the grammar, spelling, writing style and improve the jargon use.	Ring-tailed cardinalfish (as of June 2018)
Stub	A very basic description of the topic. Meets none of the Start-Class criteria.	Provides very little meaningful content; may be little more than a dictionary definition. Readers probably see insufficiently developed features of the topic and may not see how the features of the topic are significant.	Any editing or additional material can be helpful. The provision of meaningful content should be a priority. The best solution for a Stub-class Article to step up to a Start-class Article is to add in referenced reasons of why the topic is significant.	Crescent Falls (as of June 2018)
List	Meets the criteria of a stand-alone list, which is an article that contains primarily a list, usually consisting of links to articles in a particular subject area.	There is no set format for a list, but its organization should be logical and useful to the reader.	Lists should be lists of live links to Wikipedia articles, appropriately named and organized.	List of Guggenheim Fellowships awarded in 1947 (as of June 2018)

Template documentation[ਦੇਖੋ] [ਸੋਧੋ] [ਅਤੀਤ] [ਤਾਜ਼ਾ ਕਰੋ]

Usage instructions

The code below is for customizing the template for a specific WikiProject. Fields are optional, and will default to generic examples if left blank.
- Specifying the Project field will link the class labels to the appropriate quality category in the given project in the format "FA-Class Project articles".
- Specifying article class examples will display the provided text in the example for the given quality.
- The rows for Future, Cat, Dab, File, Portal, Project, Redirect, Template, NA, and Unassessed are optional and will not be displayed unless yes is specified for the respective "Future_cat", "Cat_cat", "Dab_cat", "File_cat", "Portal_cat", "Project_cat", "Redirect_cat", "Template_cat", "NA_cat", and "Unassessed_cat" parameters.

Code

Copy and paste:

{{Grading scheme
|Project            = 
|FA_example         = 
|FL_example         = 
|A_example          = 
|GA_example         = 
|B_example          = 
|C_example          = 
|Start_example      = 
|Stub_example       = 
|List_example       = 
|Future_cat         = 
|Future_example     = 
|Cat_cat            = 
|Cat_example        = 
|Dab_cat            = 
|Dab_example        =
|FM_cat             = 
|FM_example         = 
|File_cat           = 
|File_example       = 
|Portal_cat         = 
|Portal_example     = 
|Project_cat        = 
|Project_example    = 
|Redirect_cat       = 
|Redirect_example   = 
|Template_cat       = 
|Template_example   = 
|NA_cat             = 
|NA_example         = 
|Unassessed_cat     =
|Unassessed_example =
}}

Standard class types
FA	FL	FM	A
{{Class\|FA}}	{{Class\|FL}}	{{Class\|FM}}	{{Class\|A}}
GA	B	C	Start
{{Class\|GA}}	{{Class\|B}}	{{Class\|C}}	{{Class\|Start}}
Stub	List	NA	???
{{Class\|Stub}}	{{Class\|List}}	{{Class\|NA}}	{{Class\|Unassessed}}
Non-standard class types
Current	Future	SIA	AL
{{Class\|Current}}	{{Class\|Future}}	{{Class\|SIA}}	{{Class\|AL}}
BL	CL	SL	Category
{{Class\|BL}}	{{Class\|CL}}	{{Class\|SL}}	{{Class\|Category}}
Disambig	Draft	File	Merge
{{Class\|Disambig}}	{{Class\|Draft}}	{{Class\|File}}	{{Class\|Merge}}
Needed	Portal	Project	Redirect
{{Class\|Needed}}	{{Class\|Portal}}	{{Class\|Project}}	{{Class\|Redirect}}
Template	User
{{Class\|Template}}	{{Class\|User}}
Importance types
Top	High	Mid	Low
{{Importance\|Top}}	{{Importance\|High}}	{{Importance\|Mid}}	{{Importance\|Low}}
Bottom	NA	???
{{Importance\|Bottom}}	{{Importance\|NA}}	{{Importance\|Unknown}}

ਫਰਮਾ:Grading scheme

Usage instructions

Code

See also

For B rating evaluation