Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2012 February 11

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Randy Racing 5.jpeg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Credit to Willa Stein 2010 conflicts with license. Eeekster (talk) 01:22, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:New WWC Logo2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Logo presumably copyright of the organisation it relates to, uploader appears to have been a role account for the organisation but we have no evidence that the person operating that account had authority to release their logo into the public domain. Logo also includes a montage of other images which may be separately copyrighted. January (talk) 11:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antranig Fedayee.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No Freedom of Panorama in Armenia per Commons:Commons:FOP#Armenia so why should this be free? Erected in 1999 per List of statues in Yerevan. Many of the other pictures on List of statues in Yerevan is also not free unless I'm wrong here. MGA73 (talk) 17:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't commons. Files do not need to be copyright free in the country of origin and the United States to be listed as free. Files just need to be free in the United States. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No freedom of panorama for public artworks in the United States either, so not free there either. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:IMGP2607.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs).

• The banner on the telephone pole is likely copyrighted. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:NEIU 3 (2).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Public artwork in the United States. Looks recent. Stefan2 (talk) 21:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sam Sweeney, Cheltenham.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Permission statement indicates the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed in the license tag. Eeekster (talk) 21:46, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Yes, permission given to use image of wiki; therefore making me a copyright owner of the image. If there is more appropriate copyright tag to be added, the let me know. The Only Random Person (talk) 22:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, permission (i.e. a license) doesn't mean a transfer of ownership of the copyright. Nor have you supplied any evidence of that permission. Eeekster (talk) 22:03, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok; well as there's no possible way of proving the permission, then you may delete if you wish; I shall find another image. The Only Random Person (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Permission for use on Wikipedia only is not enough. If you wish to prove that you have permission, you need to follow the instructions at WP:DCM. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Location of Vergadeika.jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• Is this really own work? Stefan2 (talk) 22:16, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:00, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sam Sweeney and Hannah James.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See #File:Sam Sweeney, Cheltenham.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 22:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply above; delete this also if you must. — Preceding unsigned comment added by The Only Random Person (talk • contribs) 22:21, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lucretia - Rembrandt 1664 - Wash DC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• See commons:COM:ART#When should the PD-Art tag not be used?. There is a 3D frame at the bottom. There doesn't seem to be any English Wikipedia version of commons:Template:Non-free frame. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:McNeeRanch-MontaraStateBeach-TrailheadSign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• No freedom of panorama for maps in the United States. See commons:COM:FOP#United States. Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is in the public domain for the following reasons:

1. The 'billboard' is a map of a State Park in California.

2. There is no explicit copyright statement on the work.

3. Therefore it is assumed to be (a) in the public domain already, or (b) published by the state.

4. According to http://www.library.ca.gov/gps/docs/OCLCFIN.pdf (see top of page 20), works not explicitly claiming copyright protection may be inferred to be in the public domain.Calbookaddict (talk) 17:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Since I've never heard of this beach before, I read Montara as Montana. I need to remember to look more carefully. The map seems to be fine. Copyright notices are irrelevant for maps first published on 1 March 1989 or later and this map looks recent, but the California State thing looks enough. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:03, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:TonyHey-EducauseAU07.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs).

• I don't think that the background is de minimis. Stefan2 (talk) 23:48, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a policy you're pointing to? I'm happy to crop it further if required. I took the picture, Tony knew what it was for - I'm not sure I understand the "unfree" complaint here? Natebailey (talk) 09:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See commons:COM:DM for an explanation of de minimis. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:03, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.