Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2011 May 9

Alison Rosen (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (XfD|restore)

This page was deleted in 2009 and then salted after recreation. Although I'm not sure this person is notable enough for an independent page, I believe it should be created as a redirect to The Adam Carolla Show (podcast). She is currently (from early 2011) the full time news person/sidekick for this notable program. I believe this should be non-controversial, but being salted I was unable to boldly recreate. Also the deleting admin is not currently active, no offense is intended for skipping that step. Cube lurker (talk) 20:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what the normal process is here, but I agree this page should at least be a redirect to The Adam Carolla Show (podcast) with some content added there. Argument for an independent page could stem from part 3 of WP:CREATIVE for her work on the Carolla podcast and parts 1 and 2 of WP:ENT for her numerous contributions on news programs, magazines, websites, etc. and a large following on ustream, youtube, twitter, etc.

Bottom line is that there are enough people who may want to know more about her after seeing her, hearing her, or reading her articles that some information should be included at an accessible point in Wikipedia. Also, If Rosen isn't given an independent page, perhaps Bryan Bishop should be compiled into the Adam Carolla Show page and converted into a redirect as well. Udeezy (talk) 21:24, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Right now the only mention of her in the target article is unsourced. If someone will expand that a bit and add a source or two, I will happily create the redirect; I don't see it as a big deal or necessarily needing a full DRV. Chick Bowen 21:38, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

1 source added. Further verifiability is also available aty the primary source www.adamcarolla.com already listed as an external link.--Cube lurker (talk) 23:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Chick Bowen 02:15, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Shady Bard (talk|edit|history|logs|links|watch) (restore)

"Having looked at WP:BAND, the band Shady Bard meet criteria:

1. Has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, published works appearing in sources that are reliable and are independent from the musician or ensemble itself.[note 1]

They have been reviewed by The Sunday Times, Q, Uncut, Word, Music Week, Artrocker, Metro.

and

10. Has performed music for a work of media that is notable, e.g. a theme for a network television show, performance in a television show or notable film, inclusion on a notable compilation album, etc. (But if this is the only claim, it is probably more appropriate to have a mention in the main article and redirect to that article. Read WP:BLP1E and WP:BIO1E for further clarifications)

Their music has appeared repeatedly on episodes of ABC's Emmy-award winning Grey's Anatomy, on Without A Trace and has soundtracked the MTV Switch global climate change awareness campaign.

Having discussed this with the deleting administrator User:PhilKnight 86.5.215.208 he told me to request this here (talk) 10:51, 9 May 2011 (UTC)DougManagement DougManagement (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)DougManagement[reply]

I wouldn't be too terribly surprised if the band has gained notability some time in the past three years, since the deletion. If you want to write an article about the band, feel free. You don't need to request here. Cheers. lifebaka++ 14:32, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with lifebaka; no special permission should be required if a band has gained notability in the several-year interval since an uncontested A7 speedy deletion. However, if, as your username suggests, you might be involved in the band's professional affairs, anything beyond a brief, carefully phrased, strictly factual text is likely to be poorly received here, and your involvement, if any, should be disclosed on the article's talk page. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]