Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tina Piermarini

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tina Piermarini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been tagged as promotional for a decade. Was created by a single-purpose account. Unclear that notability has been established. -- Beland (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Beland (talk) 00:22, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Massachusetts, and Texas. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:50, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Somewhat promotional article; sources appear to all be primary, trivial mentions and/or non-independent, resulting in no GNG or NBIO pass. Dclemens1971 (talk) 03:31, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete "She designed and implemented marketing and business development strategies for global companies" Wooh. WP:NOTCV - fails WP:GNG, sources are press releases, company announcements, passing mentions. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 07:06, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Ugh, entirely promotional. Wish this had been taken to AfD ten years ago, but no time like the present. Ravenswing 07:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above reasons. Mekomo (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:NOTPROMO.4meter4 (talk) 16:33, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Board member doing business things, is about the extent of the article, as I read it. Nothing that seems to stand out from any other business executive. Links at the bottom are simply confirmation of employment activities, not showing notability. Oaktree b (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.