Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Muley Jat
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:27, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Muley Jat (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am not sure whether this should be merged or deleted. I have been searching for solid references that refer to Muley Jat, but cannot find one. Some peer advice would be welcome. Sikh-History 20:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ethnic groups-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep but perhaps with a different name. While there seems to be a spelling problem, I am getting multiple positive hits on Mula Jat; perhaps Mula Jat is a more common spelling. A real group of Muslims from the Jat tribe (or jat growers) in Punjabi India and Pakistan.
- book discusses mula jat
- book discusses mula jat
- Google book search, lots of commentary here, not all the books have page hits when you go in, but the Google summaries are convincing
- Aquib (talk) 05:45, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ok lets start adding citations.--Sikh-History 15:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Most paragraphs have a citation, not a bad looking collection of sources for a small article. Goes a little heavy on the census data. Aquib (talk) 01:49, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- ok lets start adding citations.--Sikh-History 15:22, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:09, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply] - The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.