Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maria Neacșu

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 15:00, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Maria Neacșu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Similar case to Anamaria Gorea. A database entry rather than an article and no evidence of WP:SPORTBASIC or WP:GNG. The only source that is more than a trivial mention is FRF but SPORTBASIC states that Team sites and governing sports bodies are not considered independent of their players. so an article in FRF does not support a notability claim as it's the governing body for Romanian football. Having translated the article, there isn't that much independent content and, in any case, even if the article were considered good, one article isn't enough for SPORTBASIC or GNG. The only other source that wasn't a database source was Opinia Timisoarei but it's only a trivial mention. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:56, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.