Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of deceased cardinals
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 02:40Z
- List of deceased cardinals (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Given the size and scope of the Catholic Church, there are literally thousands of cardinals who could be listed here. The inability to maintain such a list, as well as the list's uselessness(List of cardinals includes all living cardinals, so by definition any cardinal not listed there is deceased) clearly qualifies this article for deletion. Hemlock Martinis 00:19, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Ganfon 00:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as per above. This list will be almost impossible to maintain, not to mention the magnitude of Catholic Cardinals in the very long history of the church making this also nearly impossible to complete. --† Ðy§ep§ion † Speak your mind 00:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete gigantic, probably impossible to update/build. science4sail talkcon 00:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The reasons have been well laid out above. Selket Talk 00:57, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Categorise into Category:Cardinals and subcats, then delete. As Hemlock has stated, there are thousands of possible entires, and the list will continue to expand for as long as the Catholic Church exists (and beyond, as the last ones fall). -- saberwyn 03:20, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This reminds me of the recent discusson about Dead Playboy Playmates. Basically, if you're dead, we don't like you. :) Just kidding. YechielMan 04:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- No, we have nothing against "you," we just don't want a list of other dead people who were like "you." -Selket Talk 09:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Otto4711 04:56, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Realkyhick 05:33, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. All of the individuals listed seem to already be in Category:Cardinals or Category:Cardinals by nationality. -- Black Falcon 07:22, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Update. I checked and all except two were already in the two categories noted above (whether correctly or not is a different matter). I added the two that were missing, so I think this list can safely be deleted now. -- Black Falcon 07:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Any list of dead people is most likely going to be unmaintainable. --UsaSatsui 10:27, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nomJulia 15:51, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete The article does not meet WP:NOT#INFO.TellyaddictEditor review! 16:08, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NOT and the general problem with "List of dead [fill-in-the-blank]" articles. MastCell 20:58, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unmaintainable list Resolute 23:23, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Use category instead. Argyriou (talk) 23:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No need for such a list. (And difficult to manage.) ElinorD 12:54, 13 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Would be a huge list if complete, which is probably impossible. Gimmetrow 20:23, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.