Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Li Xuantong

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:52, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Li Xuantong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable figure skater; no senior-level medal placements. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Skating, and China. Bgsu98 (Talk) 08:26, 1 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:27, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong keep. Here's a full-fledged biography on Sina.cn: [1]. --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• One more article → [2].
  I don't know what this is, it looks like a very lengthy print magazine article plus an interview. Changing my vote to "Strong keep"--Moscow Connection (talk) 02:25, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Both articles talk about her and her partner Wang Xinkang. He is also nominated for deletion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wang Xinkang. --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:32, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I did a very, very quick Google News search for her name in Chinese. You can search more if you want, also for her partner's name. But that's enough for me. --Moscow Connection (talk) 02:36, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment The Sina.cn article looks good, the second one is quite interview heavy which are generally unpopular on AfD but there is a short bio about them as well so leaning towards a keep at the moment. Given the age and the fact that this skater is active there is a reasonable chance that more GNG sources may appear in the near future,.Canary757 (talk) 07:17, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Keep Significant overage found by @Moscow Connection which they will hopefully add to the article itself to give readers further insight into this skater and avoid any future AFD.

    Shrug02 (talk) 11:21, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

    • Thank you! (I did save some articles after all.) --Moscow Connection (talk) 11:31, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: The sources provided by Moscow Connection appear to have the needed WP:SIGCOV to meet the WP:GNG. Let'srun (talk) 15:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 08:16, 15 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.