Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/James Farr (animator)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Vanamonde93 (talk) 23:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

James Farr (animator)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Refs consist almost entirely of primary sources (i.e: YouTube and Farr's website), and the article reads like a resume with lots of fluff/promotional material. A Google search doesn't reveal much in the way of secondary, reliable sources. KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 21:04, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: As much as I hate to say it, I agree. Looking at the article's history shows it was written mostly by IP users, who I assume do not typically read Wikipedia's Manual of Style. Not to mention the fact that I remember having to remove a large chunk of outright false information a few months ago. Farr is a very notable animator, but there just aren't enough reliable sources to warrant an article on him. SleepDeprivedGinger (talk) 21:10, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: PROMO article that reads like an extended CV. This person exists [1], but an interview doesn't prove notability and [2] My Nintendo News doesn't seem to be a RS. Oaktree b (talk) 21:12, 5 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Actors and filmmakers, Artists, Comics and animation, Internet, and Oklahoma. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 08:13, 6 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Sources too weak to show notoriety, an interview is not an independent source and YouTube is not a reliable source SparklingBlueMoon (talk) 15:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.