Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Funkefeller

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Owen× ☎ 14:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Funkefeller

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about a not-notable electronica producer. Of the article's 5 references, 1 is to their non-notable label's website, and the other four are all blog articles written by that label in a community feed. Also, he seems to have started the label himself the same year this article was written. The Wikipedia article seems to have long outlasted the artist and their label, all because they formatted five references that looked legit at a glance. Here2rewrite (talk) 14:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Bands and musicians, and Arizona. – The Grid (talk) 14:36, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, does not seem to be anything to suggest notability.TheLongTone (talk) 15:30, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Well, the article has five sources, four of which are red per Cite Highlighter, so non-notable (the Beatport ones). Gsearch is straight to streaming sites of every variety, and Gnews has nada. This funky fellow doesn't seem to meet notability, but the music does seem pretty interesting. Oaktree b (talk) 21:41, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.