Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EFounders

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 21:13, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

EFounders

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently non-notable small company, coverage does not satisfy WP:NCORP. News results consist almost entirely of press-releases, many of them on TechCrunch. Scale of the business is small – according to the source in the page, the investment in Mailjet was €180000, which in Paris might just be enough to buy you a one-room "studio" flat.

Notes: this is neither the company started by Dean Gardner and Bashir Wada some twenty-odd years ago, nor the Alibaba training programme of the same name; it's also blatant undisclosed paid editing from the outset. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:41, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 09:47, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 19:00, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Not notable enough at this point in time per GNG. ~riley (talk) 23:54, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.