Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dr. Denton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Blanket sleeper. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:46, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Denton (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable product called 'Dr. Denton', a type of pyjama or blanket. No sources and I cannot find any additional information about this brand of blanket anywhere, and I have never heard of this brand either even thought it is allegedly a genericised trademark.   Kadzi   (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions.   Kadzi   (talk) 19:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment, looking at this, I feel like it probably would pass notability, but i'd want to dig a bit deeper before committing to that stance. I have found this article from the LA times back in 1978, which is a significant coverage of the product(s), though I don't know what exactly it is (reads like a review of sorts). For a company dating back to the mid-1800s, i'd imagine there would be other sufficient material out there. Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 21:56, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Femke (talk) 19:46, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Unless better sources are found, I could only find things by anyone named Denton. Oaktree b (talk) 23:01, 1 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Blanket sleeper. This brand name is recognized as a specific kind of garment, including by the U.S. government; see U.S. Customs Service, U.S. Court of International Trade. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:56, 2 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 20:49, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Blanket sleeper. Unfortunately nothing to merge, since the text has no references. Loew Galitz (talk) 21:37, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Blanket sleeper. Not sure how an article from 2007 managed to live this long without someone noticing the lack of references. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:48, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.