Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David P. Levin

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep per #1 (non-admin closure) Mdann52 (talk) 21:32, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

David P. Levin (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. No reliable sources. Pizzole (talk) 17:41, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

*Redirect and merge to MTV Sorry, we can't find no more about Mr. Levin. Google show only 200 results and a lot of these are from social. I see no news and no newspaper talking about it.(Pizzole (talk) 18:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC))Nominator does not get to !vote a second time. Feel free to comment. Onel5969 TT me 18:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep [1], [2] establishes him as a co-author of a published book, [3] establishes "Hollywood.com" as RS for the claims made at [4] etc. There are some worthless sources in use (like the NYT one used), but the claim made by the OP is incorrect, and the person clearly meets WP notability requirements. Collect (talk) 17:59, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Sources aren't reliable and from poor websites. There are Blogs, link to Amazon and resources no more available. (Pizzole (talk) 18:13, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]
Really? And you nominate multiple articles for deletion without making any notifications to people? You find the "first African-American letter carrier" is "not notable"? You find a person who was a Dean of Dartmouth and a college [resident "not notable"? An assistant Secretary-General of the United Nations is "not notable"? The publisher of the major reference work on artists is "not notable"? And all of the articles you rapidly find are just accidentally written by those who say the brand-new Italian horrordatabase site should be deleted? Accidentally? You, sir, are a vandal in the old Roman sense of the word. Collect (talk) 18:33, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please excuse me, Onel5969, you can delete my last vote (Redirect and merge). It was a mistake. (Pizzole (talk) 18:39, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Comment - Can't delete it Pizzole, but did strike it through, which is the proper procedure. And please, take my suggestion to heart about withdrawing your recent spate of nominations targeting editors who didn't agree with your position on the Horror article. That would really help begin re-establishing your good faith. Onel5969 TT me 18:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm in good faith, Onel5969. It's not a debat about me but about the article.(Pizzole (talk) 18:50, 24 October 2015 (UTC))[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Human3015TALK  18:53, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.