Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danila Medvedev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:20, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Danila Medvedev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Merge to KrioRus, the subject does not appear to pass WP:GNG himself, and WP:SIGCOV is difficult to obtain. Medvedev appears to be mentioned in some books, but he is not the subject of them, nor did he write them. 30Four (talk) 07:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Science and Russia. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:41, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:28, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 00:04, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I agree this doesn't meet notability, but I don't really like the idea of merging or redirecting to KrioRus. According to that article, 11 people are listed as founders rather loosely, so I don't see anything that really has to have this subject as a redirect. Probably best to delete and recreate if they ever do gain more notability whether through that company or otherwise. KoA (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.