Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baking a Dream: The Theobroma Story

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ^Complex/_Rational 18:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baking a Dream: The Theobroma Story

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotional article that doesn't meet WP:NBOOK. As the article exists, the only source is an excerpt from the book and a plot that's probably copied straight from the back page. A WP:BEFORE check found one source from The Hindu that may be helpful - [1]. It's not really a review, more of an interview but it's at least better than what's currently there. I don't think it's enough to meet NBOOK though. Ravensfire (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Authors and India. Ravensfire (talk) 17:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Perhaps redirect to an article about the two women or about the cafe, with the same name as the book. [2], scattered hits in Indian media about the pair, that mentions the book in passing... Thoughts? Oaktree b (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Promotional Article for a restaurant chain. WP:PROMO ChunnuBhai (talk) 13:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:SIGCOV and WP:SPAM. The first source seems ok, but the second is a first-person entitled interview, which isn't. In 2024, eveybody knows we are not Pinterest or Etsy. I don't see significant coverage in independent sources, but ping me if you find something better and add it to the page. Bearian (talk) 16:37, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This article seems like it was made to promote the book. The plot seems overly promotional.Sk1728 (talk) 17:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.