User talk:TheChunky/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:TheChunky. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

• Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
• Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
• Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
• No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
• If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
• Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
• Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello TheChunky, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Exodus of Kashmiri Hindus have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — MarkH₂₁^talk 03:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

The content I added in the article was in public domain. The is allows us to use the content after giving reference to Article owner.

Kindly add back the information. That is too much important for the article. As this article is not from the neutral point of view. I added the two sides of the Exodus as neutral point in the article. :I firstly read that Wikipedia allowed neutral point of view only in Articles. Biased articles not allowed.

I loved to make Wikipedia neutral. TheChunky (talk) 04:50, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

You copied and pasted directly from an article by Scroll.in. Do you have evidence that their content is in the public domain as you claim? — MarkH₂₁^talk 05:27, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

Yes I copied and modified it as neutral point of view. And scroll.in allows us to use information, read Sharing Your Information-point 4. https://blog.scroll.in/privacy-policy-764ca1ea1166

Syndication and use of RSS means we can use the content on other websites except personal information. And the article I made is not personal, it is public data.

Now please revise back my edits. TheChunky (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

I joined Wikipedia some days ago, after reading some of it's policies what is allowed and what not. And I know what is right for Wikipedia. By reverting my all the edits, you guys are doing wrong. I have given evidence now. And if still my edit didn't come back. I will quit this.

I don't have much time to give evidence of everything which I edit.

I love to contribute Wikipedia and want to make Wikipedia more neutral and verified. But you are stopping me by these ways. TheChunky (talk) 00:12, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

TheChunky, you seem to find it quite difficult to follow the policies. So, here is a simple-minded explanation. You need to write your own content in your own words for Wikipedia. If you are unable to do so, you cannot edit Wikipedia. (The fact that the content should be based on what the reliable sources say does not imply that you can copy them.) -- Kautilya3 (talk) 15:20, 21 March 2020 (UTC)

Okay I got it, I will write the copy pasted content but you had reverted other editing also. Revert other minor edits, I am going to write the copy pasted content in my way. TheChunky (talk) 01:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

To be clear on what Kautilya3 means, ensure that all claims and ideas in the added content are directly supported by a reliable source and attributed to the source. Otherwise, if you really write your own content or your own interpretation of content, then it is original research or synthesis which are not permissible. — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:47, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! You created a thread called How to add protection layer on Articles saving from vandalism at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread. Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 22 March 2020 (UTC)

Please do not change the standard spelling. It is really simple: if the article name is spelled "Ramadan", then so should the article and all other articles on Wikipedia, except when it is spelled otherwise in a straight quote. Debresser (talk) 10:21, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Ramadan doesn't make actual pronunciation. It is simple mistake. Ramadhan makes actual pronunciation. TheChunky (talk) 10:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Be that as it may, please do not change the standard spelling on Wikipedia without discussion. Debresser (talk) 14:17, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Several times, you created and worked on a draft, and then created an article on the same topic. This means that both the article and draft co-exist. Either use the process of submitting drafts to Articles for Creation for review and accpet/decline, or else tag the abandoned draft with a request that it be deleted. The tag to put as the first line of the draft is db-g7 inside double curly brackets {{ }} David notMD (talk) 09:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You for telling this. I am a new user. I didn't knew this before. Now I will delete the drafts whose articles I published directly.

Actually I was firstly collect the article in a draft and when I complete my article for publish, I use the direct procedure.

Now I understand.

Thanks again. (TheChunky (talk) 09:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC))

If you need help on any issue I may be helpfulMariyaibrahim (talk) 09:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes dear, I might need your help. I will drop a message on talk page when I need your help. And if you need help which I can do, I am also available here, to do all the things under policies of Wikipedia TheChunky (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky

Thank you for creating Safoora Zargar.

User:AaqibAnjum, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The subject has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources and is definitely notable for having a stand-alone article, even per WP:1E.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AaqibAnjum}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:29, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You brother. You may know how much misinformation was spread about that person. So I collected the information and made this.

Thanks, hope you guide me in future too. @AaqibAnjum:

— TheChunky (talk) 22:34, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky:, If there is much vandalism, please request for page protection at WP:RFPP. Thanks. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:36, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You, the article Safoora Zargar was much vandalised since I created it. I managed edit it again and again.

Kindly tell me, how to restore older version if someone vandalised our Article. And how to mention that user for blocking from vandalism. — TheChunky (talk) 22:46, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

There is nothing 'our' on the Wikipedia. However, if someone vandalizes any article, there are two things to do, one is to revert the edit and the second is to warn that user on his talk page. You must see in the history section of any article is Undo option on the top most edit, that's pretty long haul if there are numerous such edits. If a single user makes multiple edits which count as vandalism, they're reverted through a special permission called Rollback in a single click, and that's not a permission given to newbie users. If you want earlier version of the article to be restored, you can do this by going to the relevant diff in the article's history and click restore; but that would remove all the edits made after that diff, even good ones. You should try adding content again from the history of article. You can also use Twinkle to counter vandalism. Best. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:54, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You. I didn't mean that possession for calling it 'our'. I means to say that the article I started/created.

I know that articles didn't belongs to anyone personally.

- TheChunky (talk) 23:05, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

See Referencing for beginners. You're welcome to my talk page for possible help. --

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marina Kuwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marina Kuwar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 22:04, 23 March 2020 (UTC)

The Article Marina Kuwar wad based on the bollywood actress.

I added numbers of reliable sources from National media. Kindly check what correction is required.

TheChunky (talk) 23:10, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Vicky Manhas requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DMySon 03:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Search the name, and see why it is notable. TheChunky (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

This is not the first article I am writing. I know the notability criteria.

Kindly remove this tag. TheChunky (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Dear, he has lakhs of views on his videos and now a popular name. He is working with Kalpanik Films (a Mumbai based record label).

Are these things not sufficient?

TheChunky (talk) 03:45, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Safoora Zargar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Safoora Zargar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DTM (talk) 05:30, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky, just wanted to let you know that your recently created article Zea Abad (Thathri) is tagged with multiple issues. You may remove the concerned tags after fixing the issues. The article needs reliable reference as it solely depends on a single source. Keeping the article tagged for a longer time may invite a speedy deletion tag. — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 18:20, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

I have tried to find more sources for it. But I got 2-3 sources only where it is just mentioned. And I think 'just mentioning' is not suits as references.

Just like you can also search Middle School Zea Abad Thathri scam on Early Times newspaper. The Zea Abad name is in documents of the area. So I put it on wiki.

You can help me in fixing the issues too. As you have many edits related to nearby areas. — TheChunky (talk) 22:32, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

@The Ultimate: that article shouldn't be merged with Thathri . As it was separated from Thathri when Thathri became town in 2010. I am trying to finding sources online to add them as references. TheChunky (talk) 23:14, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

I may help in improving the article as I find some reliable sources mentioning the place. Keep up your valuable contributions to Wikipedia. :) — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 07:42, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Vicky Manhas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vicky Manhas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Praxidicae (talk) 14:44, 21 May 2020 (UTC)

If you have time, please see this article I had started a long time ago and try to expand it - Peacebuilding in Jammu and Kashmir. Thanks. DTM (talk) 08:32, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I would love to contribute. TheChunky (talk) 08:36, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, How to give reference from a book which is not published online, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 23 May 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ababeel (NGO) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ababeel (NGO) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. KST981 (talk) 09:18, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: (This section of discussion is about Safoora Zargar, started by Aaqib Anjum Aafī on talk page of The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri)

Dear TheChunky, based on your last edit to Safoora Zargar in which you mentioned "being a creator, I know the subject" and so on, I doubt COI thing and have added a COI tag. Please read WP:COI and feel free to address the issue on talk page of the article. Best. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 05:49, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Note: (This section of discussion is about Safoora Zargar, started by Toddy1 on talk page of The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri)

@TheChunky:, with the greatest respect, your English is not that great. You may have noticed that the article you wrote on Safoora Zargar was tagged: "This article may require copy editing for grammar, style, cohesion, tone, or spelling." I think you should spend your time adding to articles or developing new articles rather than "correcting the grammar".

Have you heard of the word "buzzword"? Replacing normal words with buzzwords is not a good idea.

Have your heard of the concept of "overlinking"? There are several key ideas:

1. It might be useful to link Tihar Jail once in the article, because most English people have never heard of it. But if we mention Tihar Jail again, it does not need to be linked.
2. Similarly, it can be useful to link words or concepts that people are unfamiliar with or might not understand. But we need a very good reason to link words or concepts that everybody understands.
3. If there are a small number of links, the reader is guided to them. If there are lots of links, the reader ignores them.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:56, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Hehe. Sorry. Thanks for guiding me. Will do the same which you told me. And also I will try to improve my English also.

One senior is guiding me as an adoptee. Is there option to that you also adopt me on wiki. Means, I will learn from both. The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} TheChunky (talk) 09:05, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@@Toddy1: I had reverted back my last edits. 🙂 Keep guiding me. Yours guidance will improve my skills and my bad English. TheChunky (talk) 09:12, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. Sometimes, you have a good point when you do not understand something. I suggest that you use the article talk page to raise this. I have tried to fix the problem you raised about the 2018 quotation from her about her experience at school in Dehli at the age of five: "You are a terrorist, go back to Pakistan".-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:31, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

I just checked. Seems improved.

#MyRequest is unanswered about Adopting me on wiki. The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} TheChunky (talk) 09:37, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Have you got a copy of The Complete Plain Words, by Sir Ernest Gowers? There are many versions of this book. I recommend it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Also you need to take great care to make sure that information is cited correctly. It is really easy to make a mistake, and put true information in, but with the wrong citation. It is a good idea to use the "show preview" button, and check that the links on the citations take you to the right place.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Thank You for suggesting me this book. I will read it for sure. Yes, I check the reference preview. Actually, in the beginning, I use simple external link type references to all when I was new. But recently my adoptee shown me how to give reference citations. Hope, if you also like to adopt me, so that I can be a successful editor on Wikipedia. The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 09:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Linking to headings.

• [[Talk:Safoora Zargar#Role in Delhi riots]] produces Talk:Safoora Zargar#Role in Delhi riots.
• [[Talk:Safoora Zargar#Fake vids]] produces Talk:Safoora Zargar#Fake vids.

See what happens when you click on the links. The reason for the difference in behaviour, is that there is a heading that is exactly called Role in Delhi riots, but there is not one called Fake vids.

Now try clicking on #Ramadan or Ramadhan and #MyRequest.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Yes, I already read this yesterday. Thanks for this. But I just highlighted my point only. I know there is other options to highlight it. But shortly I just meant to request Adoption from you as you are one of the senior editor. The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 09:54, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not do links just to highlight things. It is confusing. The following techniques are ok on talk pages:

• ''Italics'' produces Italics
• '''Bold''' produces Bold
• <u>Underlined</u> produces Underlined
• <span style="color:#DD0000;">Coloured</span> produces Coloured

-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}18:49, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

If you look at this link it shows the number of page views of the article on Safoora Zargar per day. You will notice that there was a big jump on 21 May when the article for deletion discussion started.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:23, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Thank You for contributing and encouraging me via this article. Hope I will learn more and more from you. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}02:01, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Can you please tell me, how to set bot for archiving old messages on my talk page? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}02:03, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

code

{{User:MiszaBot/config |archiveheader = {{talk archive navigation}} |maxarchivesize = 200K |counter = 1 |minthreadsleft = 3 |minthreadstoarchive = 3 |algo = old(31d) |archive = User talk:TheChunky/Archive %(counter)d }} {{archives}}

explanation

Each main heading on the page is a "thread".

• minthreadsleft = 3 means please always leave three headings on your page.
• minthreadstoarchive = 3 means only run the archive bot on the page if at least three threads will be archived
• algo = old(31d) means only archive threads where the newest post is at least 31 days ago
• maxarchivesize = 200K
• counter = 1
• archive = User talk:TheChunky/Archive %(counter)d means start archiving at User talk:TheChunky/Archive 1. When the archive is 200k change the counter to 2, and start archiving at User talk:TheChunky/Archive 2, and so on.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 05:40, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

2018 Bihar riots, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 19:22, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

• Wikipedia uses double square brackets for Wikilinks to other Wikipedia articles - for example [[cat]] produces cat.
• Wikipedia also uses single square brackets as a way of marking up links to external websites - for example [https://www.thetimes.co.uk/?region=global The Times] produces The Times.
• But normal English also uses square brackets to mark up interpolations in quotations. (see Wikipedia:Quotations)

Consider this quotation from The Times, 6 June 2020:

"Alok Sharma and Rishi Sunak filed into the cabinet room with Boris Johnson on Tuesday. For 45 minutes the business secretary and chancellor took the prime minister through the economic outlook. It was not a pretty picture."

The quotation is meaningful today, but would it still be clear in five years time? So you might decide to clarify "Tuesday" by interpolating the full date - and the standard way to do this is to use single square brackets:

"Alok Sharma and Rishi Sunak filed into the cabinet room with Boris Johnson on Tuesday [2 June 2020]. For 45 minutes the business secretary and chancellor took the prime minister through the economic outlook. It was not a pretty picture."

If you removed the square brackets people would think that the original said "on Tuesday 2 June 2020", which is untrue. The square brackets make it clear that the words are an interpolation in the quotation.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: thank you. But I still stand with my decision of removing that square brackets. Kindly check "the Barelvi movement is the Ahle Sunnat wal Jama'at, or "People of the traditions [of Muhammad] and the community," and they refer to themselves as Sunnis.

In this of Muhammad has single brackets and if we want to add informal text in between quotation we should use ( ) these brackets instead of square brackets. Like

Muhammad says, "Allah is one."

Now if we add informal word, we should do this.

Muhammad (PBUH) says, "Allah (swt) is one."

And Instead of revert back my edits you should edit and add () these brackets.

Thank You.

— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}16:55, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank You for guiding me @Toddy1: — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}16:58, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

The English language uses square brackets for interpolated text. What other languages do is not relevant.

By the way, talk pages are easier to read if you use indentation. See Wikipedia:Indentation.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:13, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank You — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}17:17, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

Well done spotting typing errors in Safoora Zargar. It is hard spotting these things because the mind sees what ought to be there.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Thank you. ☺️😍 — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}09:24, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

In your haste to force Draft:Marina Kuwar through AFC, your assertion here that all the article's sources are reliable, is in fact not accurate. Four of the eight references are grossly insufficient. Care to guess which ones? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:33, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

In fact, Marina Kuwar is in Bollywood. And most references are reliable. When it comes to mainspace the other editors will do edit it. And since it was in draft, I have noticed there are edit in draft from a long time. Firstly rejected request were there. And I put it for delete tag two times. But admin revert it. Now when I comes to publish this after believing there are some reliable source. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}21:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

I very strongly urge you to read WP:RS and WP:UGC as starsunfolded.com is a garbage content-scraping website, indiaforums.com is a discussion forum, and thus not suitable per WP:UGC, and Telly Dhamaal, whatever you think that is, is yet more garbage. If you don't understand basic sourcing requirements, I'm not clear on how you can be expected to vet questionable articles or provide suitable references. But please feel free to argue to the contrary. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 01:00, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: Thank You for giving space for my argument. In the Draft:Marina Kuwar there are reliable sources too. New Indian Express is a proper newspaper. Zee News is a news channel. Mid Day is a "small format" newspaper. Firstpost is a news and media website that is part of Network 18.

Also if you search of Marina Kuwar on google news (Link here). You can see more reliable sources about her. Yes this article have 4 unreliable sources, which was actually added a long time ago. I think now the solution is to clean the unreliable sources and add more new reliable sources. Thank You (Ps. I am new user here, thanks again for guiding me, hope you will guide me in future too) — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}03:22, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Your assertion as per this edit, was that "all the sources are reliable". Now you know that half are not, so I expect you not to make such a bold, unfounded statement again, please. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

TheChunky - instead of trying to find sources to back up statements - try looking at reliable sources, and base the article on what reliable sources talk about.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:39, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy: Yes, I also said the same in my last msg, that editor should find new reliable sources to make it notable. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}07:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

It's not my job to do it. You were the one who resubmitted it through AFC when it still had four garbage references. Now other editors are going to have to waste their time looking at the article yet again and decline it for the same reasons as before? And you expect other editors to fix it? Don't submit articles when they're not ready, especially if you're not willing to invest the effort to make sure they are ready. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

There is a total mismatch between what actually happened and TheChunky's edit summaries on the article. For example: 01:35, 20 March 2020 ‎Career: Added Content, or 05:14, 31 May 2020‎ I have added much reliable references. But still rejected. So I need to clean up mine created draft. Now I am not interested to write about this lady. He/she made no changes of any kind to the text of the article,[1] though he/she did make some changes to the infobox. TheChunky's actions included twice proposing it for speedy deletion on the grounds that he/she was author of the only substantial content and twice submitted it for AFC review. It does not make any sense.-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:28, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Cyphoidbomb: As Toddy said that I have submitted AfC two times because of having 4 reliable sources. It got rejected due to garbage references as you said. While it is an too old draft, and got rejected several times so I added AfD tag. And coincidentally, two time deletion request also removed/rejected. Lolz. The reason for putting deletion tag that I don't want to see garbage on Wikipedia, when it got rejected for AfC too many times and no one is interested to edit it. So why my deletion request for this lady Marina Kuwar is being rejected? Reveiwers are not satisfied with AfC as well as AfD about Draft:Marina Kuwar what to do now? this is the reason I am wasting time of admin to clear this debris. Best regards — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}17:06, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

The problem is that you are a bit clue-less. So we try to advise you.

• The deletion requests were on the basis that the person requesting deletion was author of the only substantial content. The basis of the requests was untrue, so the requests were rejected.
• You ask what to do now about Draft:Marina Kuwar. Nothing.

You did something useful creating an article on the 2018 Bihar riots. Maybe you are better at creating new articles than at fixing the problems with existing articles. Something else you did well was spotting errors by other editors on articles you are familiar with.-- Toddy1 (talk) 17:29, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Ok. Thank You. The main reason why I so captious here cuz I am new. Keep advising me like this, so that I can contribute wiki the best under T&Cs. From now I will leave this Daft Marina Kuwar and follow your advice. Thanks again 😊. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}17:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

	The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
	You deserve this for your contributions to Masrat Zahra. — Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 07:14, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks TheChunky (talk) 07:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky

Thank you for creating Sagrika Kissu.

User:AaqibAnjum, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Source 3, 4 and 5 are primary, 6, 7, 8, 9, 11 are not anyway related to subject of the article while sources 1, 2 and 10 and 12 appear to pass WP:THREE., added with a fourth source make subject somehow seem notable.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|AaqibAnjum}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 07:52, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@AaqibAnjum: So is this notable with 4 specific references?.

— The Chunky urf  Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 07:55, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@AaqibAnjum: The references 1,2,3,4,5 have information about the Sagrika Kissu. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@AaqibAnjum: The 4th reference have to many supportive reference (maybe I have 4-5 references which I didn't added, having same thing mentioned). That she was member of fact-checking team. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 08:03, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

6,7,8,9,11 ref are used for completing the information regarding the incidents related her. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 08:04, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeromeenriquez was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Marina Kuwar instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marina Kuwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marina Kuwar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jeromeenriquez (talk) 19:41, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AaqibAnjum was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Marina Kuwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Marina Kuwar, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 20:00, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Indian journalists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Financial Express (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

@DPL bot: dab Fixed now. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:51, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

See Sagrika Kissu:

• when she interviewed fathers
  • missing word "the" before "fathers"
• who had been killed in encounters.
  • Men who are paid money for sex with other men have "encounters".
• She authors at Financial Express and had reported for at least one year.
  • Does this mean "In 20??-??, she was a journalist at the Financial Express."? (If the right dates are 2017-18, put that instead of ??.)
  • Citation pls
• Later, she authors NewsClick and has been reporting for Jammu and Kashmir since 2018.
  • Does this mean "After leaving Financial Express in 2018, she was a journalist at NewsClick, and reported on Jammu and Kashmir."?
  • Citation pls
• In another event, when tensions between India and Pakistan emerged after the Pulwama Attack and both countries was in war-like situation[6] but some people tried to create environment of dialogue between two countries. Kissu was one of the Journalist who started #SayNoToWar trend on her twitter, which was covered by International media
  • Go back to CNN and look at what it says. Then start the paragraph with whatever Kissu did.
• in 9 districts of Bihar state
  • See MOS:NUMERAL
• The fact-finding team’s report on the 2018 communal violence in 9 districts of Bihar state were proved by the team as “not spontaneous but pre-planned”
  • This means that the team proved that the report was “not spontaneous but pre-planned”. I am fairly sure you did not mean that.
• “not spontaneous but pre-planned”
  • See MOS:CURLY
• After 2019 Pulwama attack, when Kashmiri students and businessmen was being abused, attacked across India.
  • "was" is singular - but "Kashmiri students and businessmen" is plural.
  • "abused, attacked" - does not make sense - "abused and attacked" would make sense.
  • The "when" construction is used wrongly here. The following is correct use: "When the mouse nibbled the chocolate, the trap snapped shut." What you wrote is like: "When the mouse nibbled the chocolate."
• After helping stranded Kashmiri Muslims in Delhi, she was trolled and abused by many people.
  • Rewrite this. You need to say what Kissu did to help people, and when. You then need to explain about the abuse. When explaining about the abuse, you need to explain how the abusers knew what she had done.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 22:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Ok. Let me do all these things. Thanks for this. But I think, I have not understood that Go back to CNN . What should I have to do there? . — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

@TheChunky: It means that you read the issues from CNN reference again, and exactly relate what's been said there. - Aaqib Anjum Aafī (^talk) 22:51, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@AaqibAnjum: okay. Doing it. It takes time but I will do it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 22:56, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

AaqibAnjum if you can help in some. Kindly do it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 22:57, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: and @AaqibAnjum: Kindly check now. I have done all the things at my level which were suggested by Toddy1. If anything remaining there. Please let me know. Thanks. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 23:17, 13 June 2020 (UTC)

According to the infobox at Sagrika Kissu, she was born on 19 December 1992. There is a citation to The Huffington Post. Maybe I am dim, but I have failed to see where in that Huffington Post article it says that. Is it possible that you have the wrong citation?-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:29, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: I think I cleared it while I added it. The date of birth was added in infobox after evaluating that Huffpost ref, which shows her age. And on calculation from the date of article, it is 1992. Now the month and day was taken from official twitter of the journalist. There is only date and month. Year is evaluated from huff ref.

Is this wrong way? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 23:36, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

The process you used to find out her date of birth is good - but Wikipedia:Verifiability requires that provide citations that support the information - so cite her Twitter page for that. Probably the best thing to do would be have a citation that has both the Twitter page and the Huffington Post article, and to add the comment in the citation that the Twitter page is being used as a source for the day and month of her date of birth, and that the year of birth was calculated from the Huffington Post article.

Please could you do this.

By the way, you made the picture in the infobox excessively large.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:07, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Ok I will add twitter and huff citations. The pic was showing so small so I increased the side. Kindly update the good view size which you know. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

It is better that you look at other pages and determine what size is best and then apply it to that page. Try looking at the size of image in the infobox for Alexander Zakharchenko or Margaret Thatcher. Would that do?-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:39, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: The two pages you suggested have not any |image_size tag. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 08:20, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

One way to learn is to experiment until you get it right. (See below.)

One factor to consider is that different people look at Wikipedia pages on different devices. If you do not specify the image size, it will use a default "thumb" size, which will be different for different people/devices. I view this page on a 3840px wide display. Some people are viewing this page on an iPhone with a much narrower screen.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Experiments on the effect of varying the image width on the infobox

No image size - Sagrika Kissu photo File:Sagrika Kissu Green.jpg Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present No image size - Zakharchenko photo Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present image size 167px - Zakharchenko photo Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present image size 334px - Zakharchenko photo Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present image size 534px - Zakharchenko photo Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present image size 712px - Zakharchenko photo Born (1992-12-19) 19 December 1992 (age 31)[1] Jammu, Jammu and Kashmir, India Nationality Indian Alma mater Maharishi Dayanand University Occupation(s) Journalist, NewsClick Years active 2017-present ^ a b c d e f Cite error: The named reference huff was invoked but never defined (see the help page).

@Toddy1: Ok I understood wait let me try. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 09:26, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Toddy1, Thanks for your contribution on Sagrika Kissu, as I am new user I have to learn many things. And your precious contributions have taught me many things.

Coming to Question, in Career section you included In another event, when tensions between India and Pakistan emerged paragraph. I think this is type voluntarily work, like promoting a hashtag for a cause (like to stop war). Maybe I am wrong, that's why I asked here. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 00:03, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Cynics say that when models and actors promote political causes, they have mixed motives. They might believe in the cause (if they understand it), but they need publicity to promote their careers. The same argument applies to journalists.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:15, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Oh good. Thanks for sharing this. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Your addition to Draft:Saraz has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 22:30, 17 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: The content was not actually copypasted. As this article is about region. So many nouns are same in original article and on Wikipedia I have wrote it with different sources and made a neutral point of view. the copyvios tool shows 48% because of same words such as nouns and some things which were matching. I have seen you have removed the copyright content. It's okay. I will just fix some Copyedit now. And will not add anything from that source. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:22, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Your addition was flagged by a bot as a potential copyright issue and was assessed by myself. Here is a link to the bot report. Click on the iThenticate link to view the overlap.— Diannaa (talk) 14:33, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Oh, actually I firstly created Draft:Saraz in which I copypasted some text which includes nouns and some information about them. I pasted that in draft not in Mainspace. In draft I read the additional information from the copypasted text and added it to the related nouns. Later I removed the copypasted text. Also when I got to know that Saraz is already an article on mainspace, then I changed the draft to Draft:Saraz region and did some Copyedit again and submitted for review. But I forget to check the information I added which was same like the copied text.

Anyways the matter is sorted out by you. I don't have any arguments anymore. As I am just 2 months, 29 days old user, so I want to tell you I have done many mistakes, and senior editors and administrators like you guided me. So I just wanted to thank you for this. This will give me some experience for my future Editing. I would love to be guided by experienced and senior editors like you, in adoption method. Thank You. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 15:01, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Please don't add copyright content to Wikipedia, not even temporarily for editing, and not even in drafts or sandboxes. It's not allowed. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 15:02, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Diannaa: Okay. I will not add anywhere on wiki. Thank you again. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 15:37, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Greetings The Chunky! Thanks for your major contributions to Wikipedia, especially your edits to Thathri. Just to remind you a bit, kindly add appropriate edit summary whenever you perform edits to any article. Sometimes it is a bit confusing for other editors to know what the edit was about! Like in this edit of you, you did provide the edit summary but it was a bit misleading. You added the climate/weather data but provided something else in the edit summary. It'd be appropriate to add "added climate/weather data" in the edit summary. You're doing a great job man! Keep it up. — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 19:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)

@The Ultimate: I have added single source of weather. And it is actually on the name of Jangalwar. As I have seen, at various things Thathri is referred as Jangalwar like in shop bought Maps. So I said add extra source also. And if you get some time. You can add the appropriate readings of weather from the source given in climate reference there. I would add it but I am working on the projects right now. You are also the major contributor of the articles related to Doda District and especially Thathri . Kindly update the readings of weather/climate. With huge Thanks and regards — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 02:35, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Aarti Tikoo Singh (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

Doda district (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Jammu and Kashmir

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:31, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@DPL bot: I have fixed them manually. Because these tools are not opening in my phone. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 06:45, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear TheChunky, thank you for volunteering as a host at the Teahouse. Wikipedia is a community of people working together to make knowledge free. You are an important part of that effort! By joining as a Host, and by following our expectations, you are helping new users get a hold of the ropes here at Wikipedia, and helping experienced users who just have a question about how something works. We appreciate your willingness to help!

Here are some links you may find helpful as a Host:

• Helpful scripts you can install to make Teahouse responding easier,
• templates to use and, of course:
• the question forum itself.

Editors who have signed up as hosts, but who have not contributed at the Teahouse for six months or so may be removed from the list of hosts.

regards, Nick Moyes (talk) 11:43, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: Thank You. I will try my best to help *new users* and also add Question if I need to get helped from more experienced users than me. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 12:54, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Nick Moyes Can you add a Userbox on my userpage near the other Userboxes so that new users who visit my userpage will get the Teahouse from my userpage. Thanks in advance. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 12:56, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

OK, I'm glad you appreciate that one should only attempt to help and answer other people if one definitely knows the answer, or at least part of it. But being relatively new here does give you a useful perspective which longer-serving editors like me don't have. i.e. you can probably relate better to the newcomer's experience, and they to you. Please don't take this the wrong way - but I think it would be far better if you tried to added the Teahouse Host userbox yourself. That is the type of question one might get asked at the Teahouse, so I would prefer you to learn how to do that sort of thing yourself if you are not currently sure about it. I am self-taught in the same way, myself. (Hint: Copy the relevant code that you can find on my own userpage). Best wishes and regards from the UK, Nick Moyes (talk) 13:24, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

@Nick Moyes: Thank You. Every human can do mistakes and no one is perfect here in this world. So maybe I can do mistakes too, but please be there to guide me, as you are much more experienced than me. Regards from Kashmir, — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 13:30, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

Your recent contribution to answering a Teahouse query was perhaps too long and also likely confusing to the person who posed the question. More experienced hosts were obligated to provide more concise and clear answers. I am not saying stop, but please keep replies short, and stick with questions that have a clear answer. We all learn by doing David notMD (talk) 10:59, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Also, the current version of your signature has "Speak🗣️ or Write✍️", but it is impossible to click on this to get to your Talk page. David notMD (talk) 11:38, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@David notMD: Okay. I will reply answers in short. And for my Speak or Write talk page is concerned. It is clickable. You are here at my talkpage, that's why it is not clickable. If you click it out of my talk page. It will open this. I have checked it already. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 17:55, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

To quote Homer Simpson: "Doh!" David notMD (talk) 21:18, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

Saraz region, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 18:32, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

@Timtrent and Fiddle: Thank you. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 01:58, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Surinsar Lake, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Spicy (talk) 08:27, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@Spicy: Thank You. ❤️ — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 08:33, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky, just to bring it to your notice that you recently undid an edit of mine on Doda district which I had removed because it is more than 80% plagiarism (which I had even mentioned in the edit summary, already). Also the alleged things are being considered the facts by you, which should be mentioned appropriately by you in clear words. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a news website. Plagiarism is not allowed on Wikipedia. The content is 100% plagiarized from here and if mentioned, should have been in "History" or some other section. I believe you did this in good faith, else it's called edit warring. I have not currently rolled back your edits (which was the only option) because I dont want some later edits of you get removed, which are constructive. Kindly rewrite the content you added, avoid plagiarism in future. — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 08:37, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@The Ultimate: Thank you for not rolling back the edits. Hope you are fine. The 100% plagiarized content you are saying of this link is not added by me. This incident of Chapnari area was already there. I just made sequence date wise. This incident was listed at 4th number, I have moved to 2nd number. Besides this, I am not fighting for editing bro. Lolz. ☺️ I have added the information which actually meant for terrorism in Doda district. Because in the past, according to my research and observations, the terrorism spreads and the innocents were killed whether they were innocent Hindus, or innocent Muslims. My Editing on incidents have valid and referencing from reliable and independent sources. In conclusion, terrorism had affected both communities, but before my edits there was incomplete information there. So I completed the information. Maybe it needs minor Copyedit but overall information is backed by independent sources. Hope you understand. Thanks for message, I would love to rewrite some content which needs copyedit. And this link is about a incident which was added before me, i.e Chapnari killings of innocent Hindus. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 08:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Kind, from your side. Maybe you want to read WP:NOR also. Also I mentioned that I removed the plagiarized content (not all, I re-phrased most of it) and news-like/POV. You may rephrase it to make it look like encyclopedic content, currently it's like a news (mostly communal, instead of facts). — The Ultimate ^{Let's Talk} 10:03, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@The Ultimate: Yes sure, I will. And respect your editing, I have reverted only single edit not all. You edits were good there. Only the last one which you remove the numbers of Killings in the Doda district. I am rephrasing now. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 11:12, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

I have nominated an article you created and updated at Wikipedia:In the news/Candidates#June 23-- Toddy1 (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

• [[:File:Jai valley.jpg]] shows File:Jai valley.jpg
• [[File:Jai valley.jpg]] shows the image.

Try it.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:24, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jai valley.jpg

And

File:Jai valley.jpg — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 10:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: (This section of discussion is about Draft:Jai Valley, started by Toddy1 on talk page of The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri)

The pages parameter in Template:Cite is not for showing how many pages there are in the document. The correct use of this parameter is to tell the user which pages he/she should look at for the information (for example, "pages=13, 666" means that the relevant pages are page 13 and page 666). If there is only one page to look at, use "page =" instead.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:07, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I actually meant the page number. Not the total number of pages. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

But the page number for the section on Jai Valley was 118, not 138.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Note: (This section of discussion is about Draft:Jai Valley, started by Toddy1 on talk page of The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri)

Thanks for fixing. Review?? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:19, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

No. There are things I suggested you ought to do that you have chosen not to do. There is no point in my repeating this.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:29, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I have clarified them? Which thing is remaining? Mention me there. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:32, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Yes. If you look at the sources you cited they have lots interesting useful information that should go in the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:49, 24 June 2020 (UTC) repeated -- Toddy1 (talk) 18:38, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh this one I have replied! Okay. I will add more information from those sources. I have to stay patient. Remembering Quran 8:46. As you know I am just some months old on wiki. 😋 Suggest me the sections which I should fill with more information? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:45, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky: The way to do it, is to go through each source carefully one at a time see what you could add to the article.

When I do this kind of thing on articles, sometimes I only realise the next day the significance of some things in a source, and have to go back to the source to improve the article.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:21, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1 Done, I have added more information from sources which is important to it. It may require some Copyedit for grammar. Kindly see. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 23:39, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Dear Toddy1, I have added more information to improve the article. Any more improvement required?? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 09:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

There is a road project - it has been going on for many years. This should be in the article. When did it start? How far completed is it? Where is the road meant to start and end? Where does it currently start and end? Is it expected to be the kind of road that people in the West are used to? (tarmac surface that functions in all weathers) And what surface does it currently have?-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

The stream. Rivers like the Thames and the Dnieper run all year round. Some rivers in J&K are like that (e.g. the River Chenab). But the Jai Nallah is not like that. So how does it vary with time of year?-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Hmm. Okay. I will do that too. Let me find some sources. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 13:49, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Check I have added all the information. But it needs some Copyedit. Please do that. And any more suggestions? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 14:20, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1, Well, I have addressed all the ^{[citation needed]} tags on Draft:Jai Valley. The new information may require Copyedit for grammar.

Any more improvement??? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 19:50, 26 June 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: waiting for your response ☺️ — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 05:59, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1 there is an error on coordinates. Kindly fix that. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 06:09, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

How you introduced the error. How to fix the error.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Oh, It was my fault. Thanks. Now what is the next step for this draft? — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

It does not matter whose fault it is. These templates are good, but it is easy to make mistakes. The reason for showing you the diffs, was to help you learn how to spot the causes of error, so you can guess how to fix them.-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

If you look at my edits today, you will see that I missed out a "]]", which messed up a template. It took me a while to spot that the template had gone wrong. It took me 5-10 minutes to spot the error that caused it to go wrong. I ended up posting the completed template on a sandbox page and experimenting using page preview before I spotted what was wrong.-- Toddy1 (talk) 12:19, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1 waiting for your response. I think now the article should be in mainspace. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 11:42, 27 June 2020 (UTC) Al Kashmiri]] ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

What needs to be done is to read through it again, and check statements against the sources that are cited for them. Ask yourself these questions for each:

1. does this source really support this statement?
2. is the English OK?
3. are there things that need explaining better?

-- Toddy1 (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Please remember to indent your responses to other people on any talk page, including the Teahouse. Use a colon (:) before your response and add multiple colons to indent further. Doing so makes it easier for other users to distinguish between replies. ◢   Ganbaruby!   (Say hi!) 14:15, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

Chenab valley (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Padri

Tourism in Jammu and Kashmir (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Padri

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Jai Valley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 12:24, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

It seems to me that you have sufficient skill, should you choose, to create your own articles, bypassing the review process. I suggest you start in your sandbox or another sub-page that you create, and move the finished product to main space once you are content that it passes all our criteria. Remember, please, to 'father' articles, rather than 'mothering' them Fiddle Faddle 12:27, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Timtrent Thank you. I think its better to get Autopatrolled status before doing that. Anyways, thanks for the appreciation. Your words will work as inspiration for me. ☺️ — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 18:02, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

It is a pleasure. Part of what every editor should do here is to offer help and encouragement. I hope you will do the same as your time here continues. With small steps we become better. Learn what you are doing as a teacher, never as a student, and, above all, have fun. Fiddle Faddle 18:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)

Timtrent Okay Thanks again.☺️ — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 00:09, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

Timtrent Hi, can you please look into Draft:Chinta Valley (Review). — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 03:16, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Easy to do. Your draft quality is high. I stand by my prior suggestion. Fiddle Faddle 07:22, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Chinta Valley, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fiddle Faddle 07:21, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank You. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

I have gone through the sources to check how they capitalise "Jai Valley". When I tried, I failed to open source 16 (there is probably a temporary fault). Source 8 initially failed to open, but eventually I was able to open it. - this is temporarily stored at here.

According to Google translate, "ghati" is a Hindi word meaning "valley". Is it also a Kashmiri word?-- Toddy1 (talk) 16:53, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1 The source 16 is Indian government website. There is Chinta and Jai valley mentioned. The 16th reference valley is not capital because it refers to two valleys actually. In conclusion, there is Jai Valley in maximum sources. Valley starts from capital alphabet. And yes "Ghati" is a Hindi word. But it is not Kashmiri word. In Kashmiri language Valley means Wadi(وادی) which is also a urdu word too.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 17:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Lal Draman, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 19:12, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect TheChunky. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 July 5#TheChunky until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zoozaz1 (talk) 22:16, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello TheChunky. I noticed that on your user page, you include a {{tick}} next to "new page reviewer", but it does not appear that your account has new page reviewer permissions. I just wanted to let you know that I think this may be an error. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 21:19, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky: If you want to be a new page reviewer, you have to apply for permission. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Reviewers. The application form is on this link.

• I strongly advise not stating that you are a new page reviewer, until you get this permission.
• I do not think editors are allowed to accept articles for creation without that permission. So edits like this are not a good idea.
• If you want to know what permissions people have, try this tool: User rights: TheChunky, User rights: Mz7.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:49, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

By the way, if you applied for the permission, I expect you would get it. They might ask you to wait a month or two.-- Toddy1 (talk) 21:58, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Toddy1 Mz7 Thanks for letting me know. Actually yesterday when I was added to AFC Active Reviewer, I wanted to add that. Mistakenly I added tick on New Page Reviewer. After that I forget to remove it, as it is different right than I have. Thanks again. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 23:57, 6 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.
  

Mz7 (talk) 22:14, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:22, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

TheChunky Thank you for your reply. I apologize, I suspect I misunderstood a few things. I am working on your suggestions to improve article and especially do better job on citations.

@Socratesart: You are always welcome. First of all, whenever you drop a message any where in any talk page or discussion please add four ~~~~ at last of your message/reply. This make your signature at last of the message and will help other users to reply you easily. Also when you are discussing anything like in this discussion you had asked about Erik Reel but you had not used any clickable link which help others to go to the draft. So please always use code like [[Draft:Erik Reel]] makes → Draft:Erik Reel . This will be helpful for administrators and other editors to quickly answer your questions.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:38, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

TheChunky Thank you! Very much appreciated! I was wondering how all that was done! Up to now, I have been doing small edits and some small pages. Nothing that required much interaction and have been a bit confused as to how that discussion should be done. My apologies for the not signing with the tildes.71.238.27.58 Socratesart (talk) 17:41, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doda district, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhalla (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello! TheChunky, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri (Speak🗣️ or Write✍️) 01:51, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

I am watching you are working on articles related to Chenab Valley. So I also want to learn and contribute for Chenab Valley on Wikipedia. Kindly adopt me as per Wikipedia Adoption program. Sadaket Malik Bhalessi (talk) 08:05, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey there, I've noticed that you've taken an interest in the Shaikhs in South Asia page. I enjoy researching established religions, but I can't really find quality sources for this page. The Origin section has pretty weak sources (they mostly just link into a book without page identifiers). Maybe you can find better sources? Otherwise, I'm thinking about redirecting it. Thank you, Philotimo (talk) 02:34, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@Philotimo: Wait for days, let me check all the references, I will surely make strong references if available. Besides, the reason of revert is actually vandalism. The IP user was just removing and adding things without any valid references. So I reverted it to "at least valid" references. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 02:39, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

No problem, I'll wait a week (probably more) before circling back to it. My problem was more trying to discern if those anonymous user edits were in good faith or outright vandalism. There is conflicting evidence in my mind about it, but good luck trying to short things out with it. Philotimo (talk) 03:33, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

@TheChunky: I'm curious if you're still planning to mend the Shaikhs in South Asia page? I'll look at ways to merge it otherwise. There's plenty of issues on it. Philotimo (talk) 15:47, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Well, I am working on others articles right now. So you can proceed it what you want according to Wikipedia rules. I have no objection about merging it. Thank you. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 16:06, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

I appreciate the quick reply. Philotimo (talk) 16:20, 15 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Creating new wiki account for my friend, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

The article Junaid Shah has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of WP:notability. Just because someone looks like someone notable is not sufficient to be notable themselves. References read like they are all from the same press release and are not WP:significant coverage of him.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. noq (talk) 23:05, 17 July 2020 (UTC)

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Junaid Shah is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Junaid Shah until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. noq (talk) 22:42, 18 July 2020 (UTC)

One of your posts on another user's talk page was as follows:

Also using simply text in external is discouraged, you have to add official website etc which will be helpful for the readers. Also using <nowiki> tag alone without any reason is not good at all. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:50, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

When you posted it, it worked fine.

But when someone else posted a message with <nowiki></nowiki> in it, their </nowiki> matched up with your earlier <nowiki> and produced a mess.

If you look at the markup I have had to use to show this, you will appreciate what you need to do in future.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:51, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Sorry for this. I will be take care for the future.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:43, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Please look at the language data census tables I added to

• Doda district‎
• Jammu district‎
• Kathua district‎
• Kishtwar district‎

They are all the same format. I used a cut-off of 0.01% (rounded) - i.e. if the number of people whose mother tongue was less than would be rounded to 0.01% of the district, that language is included in "others" rather than mentioned separately. Spellings/classifications are as in the census output. The reason for the "mother tongue code" is two-fold:

• The first three digits of the code are the language family (e.g. 006 = Hindi-family of languages).
• It makes it explicit what is meant.

The plan is to do all 22 districts and 3 divisions in Indian J&K.-- Toddy1 (talk) 20:06, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Good job. You are best and helpful as always. I would love to support the plan for all districts. But let me clear Commons mess. It make me headache. If you were not there. I maybe blocked from there without any reason in general. I have explained all things there except two files which needs OTRS procedure for permission. I am understanding what it is actually. I will also add the table to the districts which lacks it. Best — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 04:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: There is one language which you added two time and which refers to same actually. The language Gojri is written as Gojri, Gujari or Gujjari . You have added it in table of each location above like in Kathua district the 006207 and 053005 refers to same language. But have separated it. Check it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 06:50, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

I understand now.

• The reason for writing "Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar" is that is exactly what the source document says.
  • The link used in the table is [[Gojri language|Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar]], Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar, which redirects to Gujari language
  • Gojri is a redirect to Gujari language
  • Gujari is a redirect to Gujari language
  • Gujjari is a red link
  • 006207 is the mother tongue code in the 2011 census for Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar
  • According to the census "Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar" is classified as related to the Hindi language, hence the code starts "006".

• 053005 is "Gujari", which the census says is related to the Khandeshi language, hence the code start "053".
  • I had not realised that the link is to the same article as for Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar.

Wikipedia is based on reliable sources - since the source splits these, I would prefer for the table to do the same.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:14, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: As you said ""Gojri/Gujjari/Gujar" is classified as related to the Hindi language" but my studies says related to the Khandeshi language. There maybe only single reference which claims relationship to Hindi but I am Hindi knowing and also Gojri knowing. Even I speak both of them. There is too much difference between both. My opinion is to make them single as it might be confusing for readers. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:21, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

I have raised this issue at Talk:Gujari language.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Please could you contribute there - I suspect that you are right that I need to merge the entries - but let us try and get some consensus - and maybe some reliable sources. I will carry on doing the tables the way I am (because the Excel processing is already set up). I will also try to figure out a sensible way of explaining merging two language codes.-- Toddy1 (talk) 07:41, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: I will also try to find some Reliable sources for topic on merging both. I am not a PC user generally. So I would likely to contribute in making tables. But I will look over them for errors and other fixes which I can do from mobile. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 07:49, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

I have gone through each of the files listed at Deletion requests/Files uploaded by TheChunky, and have commented in that place. I think you have some work to do if you want the photos kept.-- Toddy1 (talk) 08:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank You. Will address the things soon.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 12:20, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Hey @Toddy1:, help me understanding this. I was fan of a actor whose article I created but after his death. I used to visit his instagram profile. They are photos taken by some photographers and he had credited them. But some pics are own uploads of that actor. One of the pic is File: Junaid Shah.jpg and I have added a source link to his instagram profile photo in this. A user had added copyright violation tag on it saying it falls under COM:NETCOPYVIO at commons but I don't think it falls under it. Kindly help me to sort out the matter till then I address the other things at Deletion request of my all files. I am so confused which to address first.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 13:34, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

You cannot just copy images from other websites unless those websites explicitly state that they can be used either free of copyright or under a compatible license such as a Creative Commons license. Someone else will own the copyright to that image. noq (talk) 14:55, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

edit conflict

Did you take this photograph yourself?

• If yes, then provide evidence that you took it yourself. It is not a copyright violation (providing you have not sold the copyright to someone else).
• If no. Then you do not own the copyright. Unless you can provide evidence of a licence (as with The Chenab Times), then it is a copyright violation.

Does that help?

As a general rule, if you are uploading photographs that you took yourself, you need to make it clear that you took the photograph.

• Upload a version that has the Exif metadata from the camera.
• Upload a different photo than has been published elsewhere.
• You might want to consider uploading on to Wikipedia, and not Commons. That way you can upload under a different licence.

-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:07, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

By the way, it is not very likely that Junaid Shah was the author of the photograph (File: Junaid Shah.jpg). The author is the person who took the photograph.-- Toddy1 (talk) 15:10, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

@Toddy1: Well, Sorry for taking time to address all the issues. But I am already stressed. Now the point is my uploads. In beginning months when I was learning commons, I have uploaded photos without providing proper license. Also most of my uploads are from The Chenab Times, because my topic of interest is Chenab Valley and there is project on Chenab Times which I already shared. That project allows everyone to reuse the photos right by downloading from that website and give them properly credits and I did the same. Remain I have also uploaded one audio file Pheran.ogg which is created by me in a long procedure by recording it as MP3 then I converted it to ogg online because I don't have any other options here. But another nominated all my files for deletion. Another one, File:Junaid Shah.jpg was a photo which was commonly used by everyone, no one knows its copyright owner because it was not upload as a copyright work. Well, we should agree the norms of wiki. So as per norms now I believe it should be deleted. I have less experience in Commons as I always used to edit on Wikipedia. Remain the Huffington Post and Al-Jazeera Photograph, as one editors told me on Junaid Shah's pic that Hands of Junaid are visible so it doesn't holds the copyright of his own pic. Well, File:Masrat Zahra.jpg and File:Sagrika Kissu Green.jpg both have visible hands and the Al-Jazeera and Huffington Post have credited the ladies in the pics as those were taken from their twitter profile.

At the final conflict remaining is about the above two Al-Jazeera and Huffington Post files. So these both don't own it, they have credited the on-pic ladies as pic owner. So I also did the same. If I again need to provide license for these two then tell me, whether I have to find contact of these two ladies or connect them through social media etc to ask the permission or something else. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 19:25, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

You need to contact them to get permission. They need to email OTRS - I do not know the details of this.-- Toddy1 (talk) 19:31, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Thank You @Toddy1:. @Noq: Can you help me to understand the OTRS? How they have to do mail or if they permitted me online on social media or phone or in some other way. Can I mail through the OTRS. Please help. Thanks. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}`

See WP:donating copyrighted materials. noq (talk) 14:26, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Imperial gazetteer of India, Volume XV, published 1908. The article entitled "Kashmir and Jammu" starts on page 71 and ends on page 147.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Help in contributing/copy-editing article about a actor died today, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Kahara, Jammu and Kashmir, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 12:20, 21 July 2020 (UTC)

Please could you do a sanity check on the article on Aripal Tehsil. I only created it because some well-meaning IP editor had seen that it was a red link on Pulwama district and deleted the item from the list of tehsils in the district. It occurred to me that if there were an article on Aripal Tehsil such an error was less likely to occur again.-- Toddy1 (talk) 06:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Proposed deletion tag added on Junaid Shah, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Sharjeel Imam, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 09:52, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:WikiProject Chenab Valley, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Chenab Valley and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject Chenab Valley during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:26, 26 July 2020 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky,

Thank you for creating Guwahati Central Jail.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for creating this page. It would be helpful to add a few more sources to demonstrate notability. There seems to be a lot of news coverage about this jail but the only notability-supporting source in the article at present is the Guwahati Plus reference; Wikimapia isn't a reliable source and Assam Prisons Headquarter is just a directory listing.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Spicy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Spicy (talk) 13:12, 1 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Spicy:, as you suggested improvements. I have added some reliable sources and information which completed the notability criteria. So I removed the Source exist tag. Anything else now? Thank You. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 03:24, 2 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! I would like to thank you for your review notes added to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Uploadcare draft page you have reviewed a month ago questioning me for notability, so the Russian-speaking sources' notability I've used were explained at the draft article page as well. Please see below as well:

• Inc Russia (chapter of the international independent business media)
• If24.ru (it's Investment Foresight media in Russian, independent media with editor's interview describes the venture-backed startup story as well, the media has got around half million visits a month)
• VC.ru (we may call it Techcrunch of Russia, it's editor's article describes the venture-backed startup story)

It would be great to review the addition stressing out that books and journals meeting notability requirements (or not if you don't find the explanations satisfying).

Many thanks. Victor Yanin 08:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vit-ali-yan (talk • contribs)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Any Template Editor who help me in fixing a template, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 August 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Bhalessa, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Chamba and Pahari.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:28, 9 August 2020 (UTC)

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Basant Rath. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 07:08, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi TheChunky! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Need review on this, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Basant Rath, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John from Idegon (talk) 00:11, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I removed the negative BLP and controversies. They had undue weight and inadequate sourcing. Please wait for an independent AfC reviewer to examine this BLP closely.03:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC) --Deepfriedokra (talk)

Deepfriedokra I added all the controversy section from independent sources. As he became viral due to these controversies which was covered by number of independent media. I didn't endorse negative or positive. I write what it happens actually from the independent source. There is no objection source against it. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Nothing in the draft suggests that they pass WP:GNG if submitted it will be rejected. Theroadislong (talk) 17:13, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Given your lack of understanding of negative WP:BLP, you used inadequately sourced content to heap criticism on someone-- in Wikipedia's voice. I don't think you should be accepting BLP's at AfC. (@Theroadislong: in case they want to add more) WIth the backlog at AfC, I don't think you should be accepting articles you create. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 17:57, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

I am not trying to be insulting, TheChunky, but from your posts here, and the content at the draft, it appears your command of English isn't very good. This is an English language document. A command of English at the college level is expected of our editors. There are many other-language Wikipedias. Perhaps your time would be spent editing in a language you can write well in. John from Idegon (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

John from Idegon well, your point is good that a person who knows good english can edit en.wiki . But let me tell you, I have created many articles till now and the Draft:Basant Rath had information which was removed by the above admin, as he claims it was negative BLP. So let me clarify, I am not enemy or hater of that person. I am his fan. Even I didn't got any chance to talk to him. The things I mentioned in the article was from independent sources. It is same person. You can check his official twitter. He always remained in controversies. So I added same. He was suspended, transferred for these controversies and I added same.

Remaining the thing about my english. I started this article about a month ago. I completed it at my level. So I moved it to mainspace. So that grammar or other remaining mistakes will be fixed by other editors. I am not much active these days due to some personal reasons. Today I was reading something on wiki and I got the notification, so I came here for explaining you all. I am still busy for a month. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

• Wow...your idea of collaberation is you create a mess and someone else cleans it up? What an incredibly selfish attitude. Sorry, competence is required and my 8 year old son has better English skills than you. It's time you grow up enough to realize that Wikipedia is here to help people, not so YOU CAN GET HELP WITH YOU MISERABLE ENGLISH SKILLS FOR FREE. Nothing about Wikipedia is about you, you selfish jerk. It's about our readers. How's about I come over to your house and practice my non existent skills at open cranium brain surgery on you? Do you think that would be helpful? Neither are your non existent skills at English. When I was growing up, I was taught not to do things that make more work for other people. Apparently, that isn't part of your particular moral structure, or lack of it. However it does apply here. You do not have the competence to contribute to a formal English document at a college English level. So go to a language wiki for a language you are competent in, or take enough English language courses until your competency increases. We are not an English tutoring service. John from Idegon (talk) 15:30, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

John from Idegon Wikipedia is created by volunteers. I don't claim Wikipedia as my own property.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

So I guess we can add English Comprehension to the things you lack competence at too.  I didn't mention WP:OWN at all. This is a collaborative project. If you lack competence to communicate effectively in this website's ONLY language,  what contribution do you think you can make? Content decisions are based on consensus,  and in order to form one, you have to have at least a similar level of competence in the language we use here for communication. It's frankly extreamly self-centered and arrogant of you. John from Idegon (talk) 19:26, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

No sir, I am not talking you with arrogance. Sorry if you feel bad due to my words. I am too much busy these days. So I am not visiting any website regularly. I just replied some questions above simply. Hope you understand what I want to convey in my replies above. See you soon. Thanks — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi brother, i am mutahir from kashmir and i am looking for wikipedians from kashmir to come together and start creating articles for all notable persons in kashmir, since there are many notable persons in kashmir who should be on wikipedia but they aren't. If possible you could share details of few other wikipedians so that we discuss and start working on articles togetherly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hums4r (talk • contribs) 21:58, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

Asalamualaikum Mutahir, thanks for your message. Well, I am not much active from 3-4 months on wiki. But I would love to contribute wiki along with you. As you said, notable persons which means you are referring Biography articles. I am less experienced with biography articles rules and I think my 40% wiki articles related to biographies got deleted. Yes, I have contributed many notable places tourist spots etc. If you ever need my contribution on any valid article, just drop message on my talk page. I will contribute in that articles at my level following all wiki rules. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)} 13:28, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

Badshah Khan (wrestler), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī on Mobile ^(talk) 14:02, 31 January 2021 (UTC)

Hello, I tagged you in a comment. You need to respond. You need to help find more sources and information on Badshah Khan. Searches yield nothing. I have done some edits, but can only do so much. Mr. C.C.^{Hey yo!}_{I didn't do it!} 20:06, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

I will do it. Wait. Let me check. I am out station these days. That's why I am not much active. But I will respond the comment for sure. — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

Congratulations for making it to 1 year on Wikipedia! -Cupper52^Discuss! 10:59, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Thank You.😍 — The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:10, 29 March 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Basant Rath, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kashmorwiki was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Basant Rath and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Basant Rath, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kichu🐘 ^{Need any help?} 12:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Kichu🐘 Need any help? 12:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anuradha Gupta, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Anuradha Gupta, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jammu and Kashmir.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Hallo, please note that stub categories must never be added directly but only by using stub templates, which add a footnote to the article as well as adding the article to the appropriate category. I've cleaned up this article. Thanks. PamD 07:21, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nearlyevil665 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jawaad Khan and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Jawaad Khan, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil665 12:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello, TheChunky! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil665 12:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

Hello TheChunky:

WikiProject Articles for creation is holding a month long Backlog Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running until 31 July 2021.

Barnstars will be given out as awards at the end of the drive.
There is currently a backlog of over 1000 articles, so start reviewing articles. We're looking forward to your help!

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for Creation at 21:54, 7 July 2021 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future notification, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Jawaad Khan, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

─ The Aafī ^(talk) 18:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Danish Manzoor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 06:12, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you ❤️.— The Chunky urf Al Kashmiri ^{(Speak🗣️ or Write✍️)}