User talk:SovalValtos/Archives/2019/November
This is an archive of past discussions about User:SovalValtos. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Lufthansa STN-MUC
Hello,
I am wondering why you have reverted this? It is clearly a new route (see my source) for the February ski season?! My source is reliable! In addition, if you are still in doubt if this is a route, visit Lufthansa.com and search the STN-MUC route on February 15 2020. You can book it for yourself!
Anyway a response will be appreciated.
Thanks. East Anglian Regional (talk) 09:34, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- East Anglian Regional It may be a route if it happens; airlines change their minds or go bust all the time so in doubt. See WP:CRYSTAL. Consider adding it if it happens.SovalValtos (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- User:SovalValtos That may be, but in that case the same could be said for every proposed airline route across the entire world. Generally, people who view the airport destination pages want information on routes, whether they be operating now or in the future. It is possible to book the flight now, therefore the information is current and up to date. The issue with some of Wikipedia’s guidelines is that they do not cater for all subjects across Wikipedia. But anyway, I will consider adding it sooner rather than later, as the public will soon enough be booking ski holidays and those in the east of England will want to know about Lufthansa’s STN-MUC route.
Enjoy your bank holiday Monday.
East Anglian Regional (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 09:52, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- WP:NOTGUIDE looks to be another policy that you oppose East Anglian Regional. Flaunting policies does not seem to be a positive way of editing. Try to get them changed if you disagree with them.SovalValtos (talk) 10:04, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
- SovalVatos The policy you claim that I am flaunting reads: 'An article on Paris should mention landmarks, such as the Eiffel Tower and the Louvre, but not the telephone number or street address of the "best" restaurants, nor the current price of a café au lait on the Champs-Élysées. Wikipedia is not the place to recreate content more suited to entries in hotel or culinary guides, travelogues, and the like. Notable locations may meet the inclusion criteria, but the resulting articles need not include every tourist attraction, restaurant, hotel or venue, etc. While travel guides for a city will often mention distant attractions, a Wikipedia article for a city should list only those that are actually in the city. If you do wish to help write a travel guide, your contributions would be welcome at our sister project, Wikivoyage.'
- I don’t see anywhere in this policy where adding a correct airline route to a heavily used and viewed Wikipedia page is a violation. I would also like to note that if you do feel I am flaunting this policy, you would be singling me out from hundreds, possibly thousands of other Wikipedians who have done the same, which would be against WP:GF
- Anyway. Your content is appreciated and I would like to thank you for your comments. Once again, have a great bank holiday Monday.
East Anglian Regional (talk) 10:19, 26 August 2019 (UTC)
Why did you revert BH Air BFS-SOF?
This route is clearly commencing and can be found on the Balkan website, click the link to see. JamesDUB2019 (talk) 09:42, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
- It will only commence if it happens; airlines change their minds or go bust all the time so the route is in doubt until it starts. Advertising a possible route based on what an airline is trying to promote is not encyclopedic. I added some links to your talk page to help you as a new user which I hope you find helpful.SovalValtos (talk) 18:09, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Common Wealth of Zion Assembly
Hello SovalVatos,
As much as your writeup about the Common Wealth of Zion Assembly may be within your rights, the information is not wholistic and does not represent the views and position of the thousands of people that are affiliated with the organization, Your article does not speak to the church, and all it stands for.
I personally do not believe you or the source you sited are in a position to write about the chruch as many facts in your source article are very wrong.
Please leave this subject as is and allow the people who are actually involved in the organization define their organization on this Encyclopedia and other formats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tobi.akinola (talk • contribs) 08:58, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
- User:Tobi.akinola as yet you do not seem to understand the nature of Wikipedia as an encyclopedia so I have added some links to your talk page which may be of help. Wikipedia is not here to represent the views of people associated with the assembly, they might express them on social media or the assembly's webpage. If you want to change the article find reliable sources for your changes. In future please use the article's talk page to discuss it rather than doing so here.SovalValtos (talk) 11:25, 3 September 2019 (UTC)
Edits to the university of Chichester website
Hi, I've seen that you have updated the University of Chichester page before (thank you). The university now has a new logo, some of the listed lecturers no longer work here and other information is incorrect. Would you be able to update the page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.216.40 (talk) 10:20, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
Stop Deleting awards
When you don't even know about this award ceremony then stop deleting awards. It took lot of times to add those awards. Instead deleting awards why don't you add source. ABTHEBOSS (talk) 11:46, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- The work can be safely found in history so it is not wasted. It is up to the person adding material to source it. In this case you ABTHEBOSS. I did not find a source; even the website did not connect. The unsourced sections will be removed if not sourced. Presumably you got the material from somewhere?SovalValtos (talk) 11:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- All you have to search Star Parivaar award on Google.
- I am glad it is going to be easy ABTHEBOSS. I look forward to you citing your material to a suitable source if you replace it. Please sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~.SovalValtos (talk) 12:13, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
- All you have to search Star Parivaar award on Google.