User talk:Nemilar

This user may have left Wikipedia. Nemilar has not edited Wikipedia since 12 July 201. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Hello Thank you for your interest in the article "Comparison of Windows and Linux". We understand that there is a problem with neutrality in parts of the article. Some parts are biased towards linux, and some towards windows, and we are working very hard to even them out. You may find it very rewarding to help us identify the parts that are biased towards each and fix them (and make sure you update the neutrality tracking table in discussion). As you may have read on discussion, there are some domains in which one OS is better than the other, if there are no opinions, just facts, then this is indeed neutral.

I look forward to working with you on this article. Hendrixski 15:15, 3 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I was hoping someone could give me a hand with my edit to British Airways Flight 9. I added the line "Following the incident, the crew and passengers formed the Galunggung Gliding Club as a means to keep in contact. [1]" and cited the article I got this information from, but I can't seem to get my citation working correctly. If a more experienced wikipedia editor could please fix this and let me know how it's done, I would greatly appreciate it!! Thank you, Nemilar 20:04, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looks good, where the problem is ? ≈Tulkolahten≈^≈talk≈ 21:34, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

everything looks fine the reference its populating properly the only issue I saw is that you put a space in between the period and the reference you want to add the reference without spaces so the ref number isn't ever moved to the next line. — WilsBadKarma ^(Talk) 22:23, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assert to be the same user as commons:user:nemilar Nemilar 18:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with you. Summarizing what are smoking bans in one or two paragraphs would be enough. This is an article about cigarettes, not smoking bans. I think that there are more opinions for my proposal than against so the modification could be made. You can make the necassary edits if you want. Canjth 02:04, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DSC03214.JPG is a picture of the Bonfire Memorial on the Texas A&M University campus. Thanks for the generous comment! --Blueag9 04:15, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! Nemilar 06:10, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Your welcome! MetsFan76 14:09, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please be sure to sign talk pages and other discussion pages with ~~~~. This includes warning users with warning templates and the like. Thanks, and happy editing. -- Consumed Crustacean (talk) 10:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{helpme}} Please help!

I'm trying to classify the article Earthworm as a B-class article, but I can't for the life of me figure out why it isn't working! Please see Talk:Earthworm for what I'm referring to...once someone sees this, please let me know what I'm doing wrong so I can do it correctly in the future.

Thanks in advance for your help!!! --Nemilar 04:47, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

the B class is only relative to a project, with assessment criteria, however earthworm does not seem to be in a project.

On the other hand you could propose it for good article and get a good article tag if it passes! GB 04:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rating tag looks something like:

{{WikiProject Animals
|class=B
|importance=mid
|attention=
}}

the rating is just a subparameter of the WikiProject, so if there is no project there is nothing to stick it on. And earthworm is vandalised nearly every day so enjoy cleaning out the stupid content!

I haven't yet looked to see if there is a project that may be relevant. GB 05:07, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The closest project seems to be Wikipedia:WikiProject_Tree_of_Life but it has no assessment included, although it has participants and taxobox. Ony birds, dinosaurs and cryptozoology have assessments amoungst the animals. GB 05:14, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may wish to join forces with WP:WVWP which is looking at how to assess articles that are not part of a project, for the purposes of a CD publication of important articles. GB 05:51, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article on which you have worked was proposed for deletion. I removed the tag, but it needs expansion, which should be easy enough. DGG 22:57, 30 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The revision looks correct to me. The foam was definitely off the external tank and not from the SRBs. Thanks for keeping an eye on the article, though! MLilburne 20:28, 9 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article Nicknames for cigarettes, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jmlk17 03:33, 16 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nicknames for cigarettes has been sent to AfD. You can go vote to oppose deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nicknames for cigarettes. Canjth 17:03, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 19:57, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nemilar, I've noticed that while you are reverting vandalism on the computer hardware article, you've been using the undo feature, causing you to miss some vandalism in cases where there is more than one edit. I think it would be a good idea to check the history as well to make sure you're not missing anything. Cheers! Leedeth 04:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Saturday November 3rd, Brooklyn Museum area Last: 8/12/2007 This box: view • talk • edit

The agenda for the next meetup includes the formation of a Wikimedia New York City local chapter. Hope to see you there!

...to the next New York City Meetup!

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday January 13th, Columbia University area Last: 11/3/2007 This box: view • talk • edit

In the morning, there are exciting plans for a behind-the-scenes guided tour of the American Museum of Natural History.

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to discussing meta:Wikimedia New York City issues (see the last meeting's minutes).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:18, 5 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's fine. Thank you for notifying me; good luck with the article. DS (talk) 23:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

There has been a mailing list created for Wikipedians in the New York metropolitan area (list: Wikimedia NYC). Please consider joining it! Cbrown1023 talk 21:24, 22 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday March 16th, Columbia University area Last: 1/13/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, and have salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

Well also make preparations for our exciting Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, a free content photography contest for Columbia University students planned for Friday March 28 (about 2 weeks after our meeting).

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

You're also invited to subscribe to the public Wikimedia New York City mailing list, which is a great way to receive timely updates.
This has been an automated delivery because you were on the invite list. BrownBot (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday June 1st, Columbia University area Last: 3/16/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, elect a board of directors, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the last meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikipedia Takes Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wiki Week bonanza, being planned with Columbia University students for September or October.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

Also, check out our regional US Wikimedia chapters blog Wiki Northeast (and we're open to guest posts).
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 00:15, 20 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New York City Meetup Next: Sunday November 16th, Columbia University area Last: 6/01/2008 This box: view • talk • edit

In the afternoon, we will hold a session dedicated to meta:Wikimedia New York City activities, finalize and approve bylaws, interact with representatives from the Software Freedom Law Center, and hold salon-style group discussions on Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia projects (see the June meeting's minutes and the September meeting's minutes).

We'll also review our recent Wikis Take Manhattan event, and make preparations for our exciting successor Wikipedia Loves Art! bonanza, being planned with the Brooklyn Museum for February.

In the evening, we'll share dinner and chat at a local restaurant, and (weather permitting) hold a late-night astronomy event at Columbia's telescopes.

You can add or remove your name from the New York City Meetups invite list at Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC/Invite list.

To keep up-to-date on local events, you can also join our mailing list.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 22:34, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nemilar. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tripartite Indenture of 1856, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

1. edit the page
2. remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Eddie Blick (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your changes help, but I think you can do more to indicate the importance of this event. Try the second, third, and fourth sources in the results of this Google Books search. (You are already familiar with "Boston's Back Bay ...".) They look as if they might be useful. Even if each has only one additional piece of information, that will improve your article. Wikipedia discourages single-source articles, so having more references will help.

I have added a "References" section heading and a "reflist" template to your article so that your existing citation is displayed properly. Use the "Edit source" tab to see the Wikipedia markup for setting up a "References" section. That format should be used in each article that you write.

Also, can you cite specific information in your article to specific pages in "Boston's Back Bay ..."? That would be better than simply listing the book under "Further reading". If so, use the "Cite book" template and include all of the information that you currently show in "Further reading", plus the page or pages from which the information came. Eddie Blick (talk) 20:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]