User talk:Nø

I've recently changed my wikipedia name from Noe to NØ, so see user talk:Noe too.

Hi. I just sent you an e-mail using the "e-mail this user" feature. I've not used this before, and don't know how well it works, so I'm giving you a heads-up here. Phil wink (talk) 22:38, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've asked at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Psychology#Four Temperaments image about an image that you uploaded years ago. Possibly you can help clarify the origin of the image? Much thanks. :) -- Quiddity (talk) 20:22, 13 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You made change to Template:Numeral systems: your change.
Even if you think that "Unary does not belong in the "by culture" section" it doesn't mean that you should simply remove it!
Please read this.
--StanContributor (talk) 22:37, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs Mongolian numerals Boutonneuse fever Duell (chess) Ugolki Brian Kowitz Isola (board game) Inuit numerals Monterrico, Guatemala Shim (computing) Aegean numerals Shigella boydii Eccellenza Abruzzo 2008–09 Etruscan numerals Tympanoplasty Shigella sonnei Ergocalciferol Dao (game) Jul-Gonu Cyrillic numerals

Cleanup Danish phonology Audi Bendomino Merge Enterohemorrhagic Hindu–Arabic numeral system Landmark Add Sources Rob Kardashian History of Japan Padua Wikify Alex Wade Crosstrack Mental Health (Care and Treatment) Act (Singapore) Expand Square One (puzzle) Shigella flexneri Battleship (video game)

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I was surprised to see {{User en-3}} on your userpage. Native English speaker thinks you are at {{User en-4}} level. That's all. :) ~ Kimelea (talk) 21:32, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I've now changed that.--Nø (talk) 21:45, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ingen årsak. :) ~ Kimelea (talk) 21:48, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That's Norwegian...

I suppose you know that, as you declare nb-1!

(I would declare nb-½, se-½, de-½ and fr-½, if they existed - indicating passive language skills.)

Danish: "Ingen årsag" - so, as I suppose you guessed, it's close.--Nø (talk) 22:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I reckoned you'd probably have no trouble understanding :D

By the way, a user on the tai chi debate seems to have misread our conversation, thinks we are working against each other not together, and has declared that you oppose my suggestions. It would be great if you could comment on the RfD (whatever your opinion may be) as he is trying to speak for you. ~ Kimelea (talk) 11:57, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've seen it, and he(?) is certainly not very civil. However, I'm as happy letting all the slightly odd and unnecessary redirects live as I would be deleting the most obscure ones, so I won't get involved.--Nø (talk) 12:11, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

My current proposal involves letting everything live, but retargeting the Wade-Giles spellings of t'ai chi to the martial art, and the weird typos (like Tao Chi) to the disambig. Even if you don't want to comment on the RfD, I would value your opinion on what I proposed. But if you'd rather stay quiet, I'll make like John Lennon. :) ~ Kimelea (talk) 12:24, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nø. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance regarding User:Machine Elf 1735's behaviour in a current RfD. I'm sorry to involve you in this, but as your words have been quoted on both sides, I have to inform you as an innocent bystander. Thank you. ~ Kimelea (talk) 23:48, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for info. I think your suggestion (wadegilesish short versions redir to martial art; pinyinish short versions redir to philosophical concept; wrongish short versions redir to dab page; all long versions redir to martial art) makes sense. (Here, "short" means spellings of the two syllables taiji, and "long" means spellings of taijiquan.)

As for wikiquette, like Machine Elf I initially though you were proposing mass deletion, which seems not to be the right thing to do - but like you, I found his intervention rather uncivil.--Nø (talk) 12:04, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for clarifying, I appreciate it. I'm glad I didn't misread you.

I'm pleased to say there is now some civil and constructive discussion going on with User:InferKNOX on the RfD. It would be great if you could drop in your opinion, but if you just don't want to get involved I promise I won't nag again. I hope we work together again in the future - maybe when one of us nominates a bunch of the weird long version redirs ;) ~ Kimelea (talk) 05:07, 29 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'm surprised to hear you don't mind redirecting the same the words to different articles based on pinyin vs. wg. It would be better to move Taiji to Taiji (concept), make T'ai chi ch'uan the WP:PRIME, and make sure a hat note stays there.

Although I'd prefer no further response, I'd encourage you to personally reconsider whether or not whatever comments you happen to be thinking of were WP:INCIVIL, as Kimelea got no response from her copious efforts at WQA and at long last, Kimelea and I have established that I never claimed you were hostile towards her in any way whatsoever. Cheery-bye Machine Elf ¹⁷³⁵ 00:19, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The gameboard is precisely the same. They are identical gameboards. Doesn't that provide basis enough, that Uckers is closely related to Ludo enough, that Uckers would qualify as a 'See also' item, at the Ludo article? (Looking at the same question from a different perspective, if Uckers is not included as a 'See also' item at the Ludo article, when their gameboards are precisely the same and identical ... wouldn't that cause a bit of confusion to an average reader ... seeing that there is no link whatever or connection or mention of game of Uckers, at the Ludo article?)

I could understand disclusion without a criteria for comparing the closeness of their relationship, if there were, say, multiple games that use the same board, that have their own articles. Maybe there are. (Do you know if their are? My assumption is that Uckers is the only other game, that has its own article, using that precise gameboard. Maybe that is wrong. Do you know if there are any others?)

Ihardlythinkso (talk) 18:23, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have replied here.--Nø (talk) 16:45, 28 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mabalu (talk) 18:16, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I recorded your opposition. May I point out, in turn, that “Wikipedia” shall be capitalized your attempts to discredit my person are counter-productive? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:52, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Let's keep this discussion at Talk:Overline.--Nø (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For the record, Incis Mrsi deleted my properly identified copy of his above post from Talk:Overline, with the edit summary "I didn’t express my consent to insert here my postings (with my signature) from other pages. feel free to restore, but without making an appearance of Incnis Mrsi engaged in off-topical flamewars here)". I have nothing to add, so I'll leave it at that.--Nø (talk) 15:09, 24 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

Sorry for writing in English. I am trying to change my account name from Eölen to User:Noé and it appears to create a conflict with your old account User:Noe (too similar). I contact you to let you know the page where to ask for an account merging: meta:Steward requests/Username changes

I'll be glad if you ask there to merge you account to liberate your old account name. You don't have to, I don't have any right for asking you to do that, so it's only if it please you. If not, I may think to ask for a longer nickname, it's not such a big deal. I only let you know the process. Eölen (talk) 18:11, 9 October 2015 (UTC) Hi user:Eölen! Thanks for your notice. I've now editet the request page to confirm that Noe and Nø are both me - hope I've done it right!--Nø (talk) 19:50, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's great! Thank you a lot! Eölen (talk) 23:04, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a response about adding links to print and play board game sets. Thanks for the politeness, but I do not agree with you. I've seen such links on practically every article with "External Links", and they are indeed useful. Such links include online game versions, sites from organizations, championships, communities and so forth. Ocastudios' links offered people a chance to play the games, and I wouldn't discard it as non-educational. Of course, I won't insist. Isacvale (talk) 00:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've been doing some work on sáhkku, and I've noted that the articles on daldøs and tâb have listed the probabilities of various dice combinations. Am I right to assume this is your work? It would be interesting to have a similar probability breakdown for the sáhkku article. The most normal sáhkku rules have three dices marked X-2-3-0, where X has the value 5 when used to move, but it can alternately be used to activate pieces. I have no idea how to calculate the probability for different combinations of three X-2-3-0 dices. If you're not interested in doing this (or don't have the time to do it), is there any program or website which can be used to calculate the probability of different combinations? I've found some places where you can calculate odds for normal 6d dice, but obviously not for sáhkku/daldøs dice... Misha bb (talk) 12:31, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it would be nice - but actually it is against wikipedia policy; I would not be able to contest it if someone deleted it (e.g. from the Daldøs article) as "original research". Nice work on Sahkku!!! - I may (or may not) find time to study it in detail, and perhaps come up with some probabilities, like next week.--Nø (talk) 11:43, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! A shame that presenting probability calculations is considered to be against policy. Misha bb (talk) 08:25, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's not probability calculations that are against policy - but Wikipedia editors (in this case, me) are by definition NOT a reliable sources - one must (or at least must be able to) refenrece an independently published reliable source, and in this case that does not exist. Now, one might say that what REALLY matters is that the information is verifiable, and simple maths is always verifiable, but that is not enough on Wikipedia. However, luckily, no_one has challenged the calculations, demanding a source, partly because the artcles are low-profile.--Nø (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

FYI: Abacus RfPP Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:44, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Partners (board game) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Can't find any indication of notability via sources. Tried searching "Partners board game" "Partners danspil" (the manufacturer) and "Partners thomas bisgaard" (the designer) and couldn't find a better source than Boardgamegeek. I see from the talk page that even one of the main contributors acknowledges that they couldn't find any sources to add either, and that the game is "not well known" even in the original region of Scandinavia.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 21:27, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swarovski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soda (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have discovered a long standing error. I just moved stuff about. The plot thickens: the article Commercial minus sign says that it was used as a minus sign in Germany and Switzerland, nothing about Norway and Denmark! --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 10:53, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you support this Danish page, because after some time it will be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" and "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel" on this page https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU ? Wname1 (talk) 21:02, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I split Option A into A1/A2/A3 in Talk:Variant_of_Concern_202012/01#RfC_on_UK_Coronavirus_usage for voters to specify whether they support (A1) put in article's lead, (A2) in Nomenclature's opening sentence or (A3) brush it off at the end of Nomenclature. In your initial vote for Option A, you commented "they must appear prominently in the article", would you please specify if you support A1/A2/A3? Thanks. -- love.wh 18:52, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ichiban, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Japanese. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nø regarding this reversion on List of numeral systems, your parsing of Cherokee syllabary#Numerals is incorrect. Sequoyah developed a full numeral system; it's not a "system for writing Cherokee number words" any more than "64" is a way of writing "sixty four." The section of the Cherokee syllabary article could use expansion and additional detail, but I still don't understand your objection or how you're understanding what it says. Can you please help me in clearing this up? Carter (talk) 19:41, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on talk:List of numeral systems.--Nø (talk) 07:06, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi No I was merely making an edit to the Thabethe tribe. which travelled to modern day Tibet. this tribe made some discoveries as is Documented in the Shezi mines of Iraq. now Shezi was part of this tribe as well as Dlamini of Swaziland. I'm sure you know about the link between Shezi, Tibet and the Mongolians without me going I to detail about the teachings from Clan names. lastly it was supposed to read pre world war 1 era Thulaniadamsmission (talk) 17:09, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion belongs here.--Nø (talk) 19:03, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you appeared to accidentally revert the wrong edit at computer science. I corrected the revert of content added by Sh3nl0ng16 (talk · contribs). Best, Caleb Stanford (talk) 20:45, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Writer's Barnstar
	For your significant contributions... Keep it going! Volten001 ☎ 12:15, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I recently started a move discussion for the Tai chi page that you may be interested in, given the discussion you had with TommyKirchhoff in 2019. Best, SilverStar54 (talk) 18:28, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nø! Please do not edit or delete the comments of other editors, like you did in this edit. I am aware that another editor suggested you blank the section, but since then another editor has subsequently commented - and they have not had an opportunity to refactor their comment. It is rarely appropriate to delete comments to which other editors have replied. The guidelines on this can be found at WP:TPO, and at WP:TALK#REPLIED. Note it says But if anyone has already replied to or quoted your original comment, changing your comment may deprive any replies of their original context, and this should be avoided. I've struck your own comments - an alternative to deleting that does not deprive later comments of meaning. Feel free to unstrike them if you wish, and if PontiacAurora agrees to remove the section once they have refactored their comments it could then be deleted, as per WP:MUTUAL. Thanks! Cambial — foliar❧ 15:11, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An unsourced statements regarding narayana cows is mentioned in the article of Narayana pandita Myuoh kaka roi (talk) 14:19, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I thought that it meant that it was a pure base, not a hybrid like 5&20. VitAlv13 (talk) 15:08, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]