User talk:Mistico Dois

I started a new username, because I wasn't able to enter the previous one I had anymore, despite the fact that I didn't change the password. From now on I will be using only this account.Mistico Dois (talk) 21:01, 22 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistico Dois! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like I JethroBT (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 21:30, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from https://anabaptistwiki.org/mediawiki/index.php?title=Statement_on_Abortion_(Mennonite_Church_USA,_2003), which is not released under a compatible license. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation.Mistico Dois (talk) 17:26, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Franz Marc Museum, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:13, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Marc was one of the greatest painters of the 20th century. The Franz Marc Museum does meet all notability guides you can think about. The article its just missing more sources. I will do my best to add them, even from the German Wikipedia.Mistico Dois (talk) 16:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sceptre was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Have you considered adding relevant content to Franz Marc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)?

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Franz Marc Museum and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Franz Marc Museum, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sceptre (talk) 01:20, 13 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Franz Marc Museum, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:32, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Per WP:OCAT, please don't create categories with fewer than 5 members. They are liable to be deleted anyway. Johnbod (talk) 23:56, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. My point is that there are categories, like this one, that most likely will be populated. I will do my best to achieve that.Mistico Dois (talk) 01:16, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Mark Mancina. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:59, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I had just translated information from the French Wikipedia entry. I will try to reinsert information with new RS.Mistico Dois (talk) 23:22, 1 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mark Mancina. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not cite the IMDb or copy its data into Wikipedia. This is a user-generated website, which makes it an unreliable source. Please read WP:BLP before you go back to editing, and familiarize yourself with what counts as a reliable source on English Wikipedia. This is important. Articles about living people need to have the highest quality sources, not citations to some random website, like French Wikipedia or the IMDb. If you're having trouble understanding what a reliable source is, please stick to reputable newspapers. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Chicago Board of Trade (photograph).

User:Paradoxsociety, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this page!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Paradoxsociety}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Paradoxsociety 04:55, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not create Nav boxs with only a handfull of articles on them. They serve little if any purpose and, potentially, create clutter. Please see Wikipedia:Navigation template. The relevant line is ...

• They should not be too small. A navigation template with fewer than a handful of links can easily be replaced by "See also" sections, or relevant {{main article}} and {{see also}} links within the articles' sections. (See essays "Not everything needs a navbox and "A navbox on every page".)

Hope you find that usefull. 14GTR (talk) 10:13, 7 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there and thanks for writing The Shaved Woman of Chartres. I’m in the middle of writing an article on Forced shaving of women and came across your page. It has some very useful information on it and I’d like to include pretty much all of it on the page I’m writing. Looking at TSWOC it doesn’t seem likely that the page will be expanded greatly in the future so in the circumstances it might make sense to just merge the two pages. I didn’t want to just go ahead without consulting you (there haven’t been any other editors on TSWOC) so how would you feel about a merge? Dakinijones (talk) 20:40, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I disagree. There is already this article concerning Horizontal collaboration, so I don't think there is need for another one. The subject I think should be covered also in these articles: [1] and [2]]. This article in particular was created because of this famous photograph of Robert Capa. While emblematic of the head shaving as punishment of women after the Liberation of France, I don't think this event in particular deserves an article, because from my understanding it should be covered in other articles. Mistico Dois (talk) 22:41, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and happy New Year to you and yours. Thanks for the new artist (and sculpture?) templates, although I've only had a quick look at a couple. Do you have a list of those you've created, I find it useful to look at the new ones and am often good at finding new entries or using them to explore new paintings and adding categories to those (am aware of many of the older ones on site, and mine are linked to a sub-page on my user page). I noticed a large increase in the number of artist templates just now and you seem to be the source (thanks again!) but I'm not sure which ones are new. I see a note above that you may have made some very small ones, the rule of two-thumbs is that five entries in addition to the title is the minimum. Sound about right to you? I've seen your name often and good to "meet" you. Randy Kryn (talk) 13:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your wishes and I wish the same for you. I have been creating these templates a while ago, lately from Italian artists, mostly painters, since I noticed the large number of the categories with their works, and a very low number of templates. I managed to increase them from 43 to 59. I know the rules and I have been doing my best to create templates at least with six entries. I don't have a list but since it might be useful for other users I will create soon as possible a list of the artists templates that I have done lately. Nice to meet you too.Mistico Dois (talk) 01:33, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work. 16 new templates isn't chickenfeed! Randy Kryn (talk) 18:36, 1 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating Christ at the Column (Bramante).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

I think your article on the painting Christ at the Column needs a few more footnotes. Most of the statements in the article are not backed up with a source citation. Even if the source is one of the two reference that you have listed, I think it would be best to make that clear.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|PopePompus}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

PopePompus (talk) 23:58, 21 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestions. I will do my best. As you can see by yourself I just translated the Italian Wikipedia entry, which doesn't give any references, but it does indicate two bibliographical sources.Mistico Dois (talk) 00:06, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Canadian Anglican Church in North America members has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Rathfelder (talk) 12:03, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:France 1987 Five Nations Championship squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – PeeJay 17:16, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nice work on this. Am I right in thinking that the copyright on this painting, done in 1926, will expire January 1st 2022?--- Possibly (talk) 01:28, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did some research and this is what I found: "In the US, any work published before January 1, 1926, anywhere in the world[2] is in the public domain. Other countries are not bound by that 1926 date, though.[3] Complications arise when special cases are considered, such as trying to determine whether a work published later might be in the public domain in the US, or when dealing with unpublished works. When a work has not been published in the US but in some other country, that other country's copyright laws also must be taken into account. Re-users of Wikipedia content also might find the explanations here useful." You can read it all in here: [3]Mistico Dois (talk) 13:43, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Hut in Dachau Moors.

User:Herpetogenesis, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice job! This is a really good painting.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Herpetogenesis}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

HᴇʀᴘᴇᴛᴏGᴇɴᴇꜱɪꜱ (talk) 03:11, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for creating this new article. Is it partly translated from articles in other language wikis? If so I need to add a template to the talk page. Thanks Mccapra (talk) 07:30, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will be adding a template to the Talk Page indicating its a translation from the German language Wikipedia.Mistico Dois (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please don't remove the tags without fixing the problem, as you did at Portrait with Apples. The article is an orphan; proof can be found here. Thanks. Clog Wolf _Howl 15:39, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christopher McQuarrie. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:45, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:15th-century Flemish painters has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 06:25, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The article Max Beckmann Gesellschaft has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to show that it meets WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Onel5969: I added some references that I was able to find. Do you think they aren't still enough good to avoid deletion?Mistico Dois (talk) 21:24, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Bricklayer (photograph).

User:Girth Summit, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

The link for the Time reference doesn't work for me - can you check the URL?

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Girth Summit}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Girth Summit _(blether) 09:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Girth Summit:You're welcome. You are right, for some reason the link for the Time magazine article didn't worked anymore. I was able to replace it by another one.Mistico Dois (talk) 13:51, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi - that Bored Panda website looked like a blog site or something - quite dodgy, I wouldn't use that as a source. I checked the internet archive and found an archived version of the page, so I replaced it with that. I also filled in the bare URLs using WP:REFILL - hope that helps. Girth Summit _(blether) 14:21, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your actions. Thanks for the new link.Mistico Dois (talk) 17:44, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use them - see WP:ES. Thanks. Ingratis (talk) 17:11, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Clearing Winter Storm, Yosemite National Park.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good start!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 22:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Madonna and Child (Cima da Conegliano, Este), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Este.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating The Miracle of Our Lady of the Snows.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Sources exist. See WP:BEFORE ... kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:51, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Nice article on the Seated Girl in Peasant costume. I hope you expand it and then I will nominate it for DYK. It needs about 700 characters or so. Bruxton (talk) 01:54, 23 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating The Chess Players (Daumier).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the new article on this Daumier painting! It needs more inline citations for the various claims in the article, and the bare URL references should be filled out.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 16:32, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating The Republic (Daumier).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Thanks for the new article on another Daumier painting. The bare-URL references should be filled in. Try installing the re:FILL tool, which can automatically fill-in bare urls and take care of duplicate refs. More info here about the tool and how to install: Wikipedia:reFill

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Netherzone (talk) 17:12, 1 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Paintings by Charles Wilson Peale indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:19, 7 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it. I already created a new category with the correct name spelling.Mistico Dois (talk) 13:48, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! DocFreeman24 (talk) 03:07, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Missvain (talk) 14:43, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into Old Woman Reading. While you are welcome to re-use the content of Wikipedia, here or elsewhere, our licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please either provide attribution in this case, or identify the source article so that someone else can do it. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Please be aware that editors who repeatedly copy content without attribution risk being blocked from editing. Thank you. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 19:17, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Charles Dickens in His Study.

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. It would be good if you could format the references to conform to our standard. MOS:CITE

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 00:22, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{Re|Bruxton}}Its done. Thank you.Mistico Dois (talk) 00:46, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't made trivial edits when your watchlist sees that successive additions are being made. You relinking England and putting a ref in the lead cost me about 40 minutes of research and additions :( Ceoil (talk) 00:24, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry. My purpose was only to provide a reference to the date of the cross. It is in the museum website, but it wasnt in the entry.Mistico Dois (talk) 00:28, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, and had it added. Curtesy would be to wait until I had finished, edit conflicts are really frustrating, and its best to try and give latitude to avoid at all costs. All the same, these things happen (I see you are relatively new here) –and worse happens at sea– but would watch out for it in future. No real harm done; I only re-noticed the article after your edits put in back on my watchlist, so all good overall. Ceoil (talk) 00:31, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for expanding the article on Collier's painting - which, frankly, needed some love and attention, as before it was just three short sentences - but did you consult any of the sources in their original English, before translating the German article back into English? Is this in fact a machine translation?

For example, should our article describe the painting (in Wikipedia's voice, not a quote) as portraying "a golden-haired, porcelain-skinned beautiful nude woman feasting on the head of a serpent coiled around her body in a passionate embrace"? Do you have a source for the "feasting on the head of a serpent"?(!) (Yes, I know that is what Google Translate says the German means, but look at the painting!) In any event, that rather florid description is almost a quotation from Bosch and Madoff, but not quite. Not quite their "fondles the head of a spitting serpent that is coiled around her body in a lover's caress".[4]

And Bolton, Bell-Price and Da Cruz did not write "John Collier gave his Lilith a Pre-Raphaelite hairstyle of luxuriant, free-flowing chestnut curls". Close, but they actually described "Pre-Raphaelite tumble of lush free-falling auburn locks".[5]

I can't see any of the second block of text on page 149 from Bolton, Bell-Price and Da Cruz. Where do they talk about "darker relationships between animalism and female sexuality"?

Sorry, but I think this is problematic for several reasons. Theramin (talk) 00:40, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think you are right. It was a Google translation and these things don`t always work well. I already corrected that part of the translation that you mentioned to reflect what exactly the painting depicts. The German entry gives us translations from English language quotes and then it had to be translated once again to English, so I understand the result isn`t very good. What do you suggest? Could you perhaps provide the exact quotes, at least from the most important sources? I already put the tag of an expert needed in the entry. Mistico Dois (talk) 00:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating Take Off (painting).

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating this article. The first three citations should be filled in if possible.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 03:24, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating The Last Voyage of Henry Hudson.

User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article on a Collier painting.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 20:33, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois

Thank you for creating The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (Moran).

User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good work, consider formatting the references MOS:CITE

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 21:41, 30 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for creating Corporal J. D. M. Pearson, GC, WAAF. User:Bruxton, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bruxton}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Bruxton (talk) 14:49, 7 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for creating Peasant Women with Brushwood. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating this article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 13:51, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

On 17 September 2022, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (1872), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Thomas Moran's 1872 painting The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (pictured) influenced the decision to preserve Yellowstone National Park for future generations? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (1872). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, The Grand Canyon of the Yellowstone (1872)), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 8,849 views (368.7 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of September 2022 – nice work!

Bruxton (talk) 16:37, 21 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Psyche Mirror. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:41, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Woman with a Mandolin requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.museothyssen.org/en/collection/artists/braque-georges/woman-mandolin. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 18:05, 7 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you must fiddle with titles, please try to keep to one language at a time! Johnbod (talk) 22:57, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't get your comment. Its actually the official title of the painting according to the museum website: "View of Venice: The Piazzetta Seen from the Riva degli Schiavoni". [6] The titles in original languages, specially from European countries, relating to streets, squares, etc, are often kept in the painting titles.Mistico Dois (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Venice, not Venise. Doh! Johnbod (talk) 03:45, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The entry had the name of Venice written in both forms, the correct and the wrong one. Its now corrected.Mistico Dois (talk) 14:01, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thanks for having a detailed discussion over at the visual arts project page. Came to ask a favor. You've seen and added to hundreds of painting articles which I don't even know about, can you please add any examples you may be aware of to Category:Mirrors in art. It's been fun searching out examples, takes talent to correctly paint mirrored images. I know I've missed many. For example, although I'd expect to come across some, I haven't found mirrors in portraits (but haven't searched entrants in portrait categories as yet). Another idea, I see you haven't edited Fine-art photography, and since you have knowledge and familiarity with Wikipedia photography pages it could probably benefit with a touch or two from you. Thanks! Randy Kryn (talk) 11:03, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating Rodin — The Thinker.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Hi, thanks for creating the article. It appears to be orphan, could you link it wherever it's appropriate? Thanks.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rejoy2003}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 20:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thank you for your work on Rodin — The Thinker. Hope we get more of such articles from you in the near future. Happy editing!

✠ Rejoy2003 ✠ (contact) 05:20, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Kirchner Museum Davos. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 04:55, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

		Happy Holidays
		Hello, I wish you the very best during the holidays. And I hope you have a very happy 2023! Bruxton (talk) 17:50, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I wish the same for you.Mistico Dois (talk) 17:51, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Two Shells. User:Hughesdarren, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hi there, Nice article. In some of the sources (such as Tate & Holden Luntz) the work is known as "Shells", Do you think this should be mentioned in the lead? Regards

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Hughesdarren (talk) 03:21, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I am changing the lead to present the alternative title.Mistico Dois (talk) 18:20, 31 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Swamp Legend. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the interesting article on Swamp Legend. I added a single citation needed tag for the claim about the transfer of the painting from Beyeler to the Rosengart Gallery, and the later acquisition by the Eichner Foundation. The article is a great addition to the visual arts coverage.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 02:15, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I just added the missing reference from the Lenbachhaus website:Swamp Legend, Lenbachhaus (German)Mistico Dois (talk) 02:58, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Auf Weiss II (Sur blanc II). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating Auf Weiss II by Kandinsky, the article looks great!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 02:21, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on To Beauty. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for creating the article! Keep writing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Life of Christ (Nolde). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article! Hopefully you will write more articles!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:38, 23 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An article you recently created, Seebüll, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three, or a link to an official government source showing it is a legally recognized populated place. This article has zero. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:06, 2 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Original Barnstar
	The Smith Family, Fife, Scotland 1989 is a very good page. Well done! BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 03:29, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Portrait of the Painter Lovis Corinth. User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello! Thank you for creating this article on a German painter. I've reviewed it, and made a minor improvement to the referencing. I also added an inline maintenance tag as the quotation in the History section needs sourcing. Thanks again for the work you do.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I already added the missing reference, from German Wikipedia.Mistico Dois (talk) 23:12, 1 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Canadian Anglican Church in North America members indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:33, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mistico Dois,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Landscape by the Lez River, for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Landscape by the Lez River, to be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

- 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 15:13, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete it. It was a typo. Thank you.Mistico Dois (talk) 17:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Seebüll, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:01, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the warning. I will do my best to save it.Mistico Dois (talk) 16:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Battle of Nazareth (Gros). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thanks for the article on The Battle of Nazareth (Gros)!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 02:19, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Mistico Dois!

• The New Pages Patrol is currently struggling to keep up with the influx of new articles needing review. We could use a few extra hands to help.
• We think that someone with your activity and experience is very likely to meet the guidelines for granting.
• Reviewing/patrolling a page doesn't take much time, but it requires a strong understanding of Wikipedia’s CSD policy and notability guidelines.
• Kindly read the tutorial before making your decision, and feel free to post on the project talk page with questions.
• If patrolling new pages is something you'd be willing to help out with, please consider applying here.

Thank you for your consideration. We hope to see you around!

Sent by Zippybonzo using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:50, 21 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Acrobats (Doré). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hi Mistico Dois, thank you for creating another interesting article on an artwork. It is a beautiful and moving painting. I noticed it had a hatnote for possible "Original Research". I've removed the hatnote and replaced it with a few inline maintenance tags on the specific claims that need to be cited, otherwise they may be construed as original research. Thanks again for your article creations, I've enjoyed ever one I've reviewed.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 17:12, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your kind words. I translated that entry from the French Wikipedia and it was also largely unsourced there. I will do my best to correct this.Mistico Dois (talk) 01:25, 27 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Battle of Austerlitz, 2 December 1805 (Gérard). User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Thanks for creating the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 17:41, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your edits to Sky Above Clouds. Intuitively, I think I understand why you moved the image of A Celebration from the background to the lead section,[7] but I think this move could confuse readers. Because the main images aren't free, I used an image of an older painting to illustrate the background section ("O'Keeffe's cloud painting A Celebration (1924), illustrates her early abstract potential"). By moving this to the lead, it seems like this older painting is representative of the overall series, which it is not. It's just an example of her early work. I admit, it would be great to have an image of one of the paintings in the series in the lead, and this would be best represented by Sky above Clouds IV. If you would like to upload a fair use representative to the lead, you can find it here. Viriditas (talk) 18:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand your reasons. Feel free to move the painting to the previous place.Mistico Dois (talk) 19:06, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Do you think it would be problematic to upload a fair use image of the painting to the lead? I haven't done so because this is the first painting-related article that I've worked on where free images of the paintings aren't available. Viriditas (talk) 19:12, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I will just upload an image. Check back in an hour or so and let me know what you think. Viriditas (talk) 19:18, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the image. Its a very good one. Unfortunately I haven't had the chance to upload pictures recently.Mistico Dois (talk) 22:56, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I used dezoomify to extract a 156 MB tiled image as a PNG and scaled it down to a 31 KB JPG. That's called overdoing it, right? Viriditas (talk) 23:04, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose so. I'm not an expert.Mistico Dois (talk) 23:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois,

Thank you for creating Madonna del Popolo (Barocci).

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Nice Job. You may wish to copy edit this for tone and general grammar.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Seawolf35}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 02:20, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Léon Lhermitte, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Ivry and Auteuil.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:08, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to The Gleaners (Lhermitte) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 12:17, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the explanation. I just moved part of the entry about Léon Lhermitte for the new entry.Mistico Dois (talk) 15:18, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

	The Editor's Barnstar
	Hi, Mistico Dois, Nice work! on Young Woman with Cats article. Thank you for your contribution. Cheers! Dcotos (talk) 19:03, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Carmencita (Corinth). SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 08:58, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm astonished to see anyone making this move without even opening a move discussion first. The title of the article was the subject of two extensive discussions less than a year ago, and there was no consensus for the move you just made. You're not entitled to impose your personal preferences without even attempting to establish a consensus for doing so, when there is clear and abundant evidence that the move is controversial! This move should be reverted immediately, and if you want to argue for moving it back, you need to start a proper move discussion first! P Aculeius (talk) 02:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, sorry, and thanks for the explanation. But as someone from Portugal the previous entry makes no sense and seems to aply only to Spain. The Wikipedia in the Portuguese language uses the more correct way: [8].Mistico Dois (talk) 02:25, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In English—and Latin—history, "Spain" refers to the entire peninsula prior to the establishment of Portugal as a separate state, something that didn't occur until several centuries after the events of this article. This was discussed at length on the talk page in last year's move discussions. Very much like references to "America" before the United States became a country generally mean the entire continent, or both continents, not the United States specifically. When Hannibal, Scipio, Sertorius, Pompeius, or Caesar are mentioned with respect to Spain, it doesn't mean "the part that's the modern Kingdom of Spain, excluding the modern state of Portugal". "Hispania" meant the whole peninsula. P Aculeius (talk) 02:28, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You mean in fact the more correct form Hispania, which is often translated as Spain. However for modern readers to avoid confusion a much more Neutral (NPOV) title would state Iberian Peninsula instead of Spain. Its like that in the Portuguese and Galician languages Wikipedias.Mistico Dois (talk) 02:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

While I disagree I have to admit its a controversial topic and needs consensus, I will ask for a renaming of the entry and will ask to support of fellow Portuguese Wikipedians, since they most likely will agree with my proposal.Mistico Dois (talk) 02:35, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This list doesn't include artist templates that I only worked in. I hope it will be helpful for those who want to improve them. I think I will be adding new artist templates as long as I will be creating them in the future.

American artist navigational boxes

• Template:Jonathan Borofsky
• Template:Martin Johnson Heade
• Template:Emanuel Leutze
• Template:Claes Oldenburg and Coosje van Bruggen
• Template:Man Ray
• Template:Jacob Riis
• Template:Faith Ringgold
• Template:Richard Serra
• Template:Cindy Sherman
• Template:Edward Steichen
• Template:Alfred Stieglitz
• Template:Paul Strand
• Template:James Turrell

Canadian artist navigational boxes

• Template:Louis-Philippe Hébert
• Template:Jeff Wall

Croatian artist navigational boxes

• Template:Ivan Meštrović

Czech artist navigational boxes

• Template:Master Theodoric

Danish artist navigational boxes

• Template:Vilhelm Hammershøi
• Template:Bertel Thorvaldsen

Dutch artist navigational boxes

• Template:Ferdinand Bol
• Template:Aelbert Cuyp
• Template:Gerrit Dou
• Template:Gabriël Metsu
• Template:Gerard ter Borch
• Template:Maarten van Heemskerck
• Template:Gerard van Honthorst
• Template:Isaac Israëls
• Template:Matthias Stom

English artist navigational boxes

• Template:Roger Fenton
• Template:William Powell Frith
• Template:George Hayter
• Template:Charles Sargeant Jagger
• Template:Thomas Lawrence
• Template:Paul Nash (artist)
• Template:Elizabeth Thompson

Flemish artist navigational boxes

• Template:Dieric Bouts
• Template:Paul Bril
• Template:Quentin Matsys

French artist navigational boxes

• Template:Jules Bastien-Lepage
• Template:Marie Bracquemond
• Template:Alexandre Cabanel
• Template:Henri Cartier-Bresson
• Template:Philippe de Champaigne
• Template:Théodore Chassériau
• Template:Honoré Daumier
• Template:Paul Delaroche
• Template:Robert Delaunay
• Template:Gustave Doré
• Template:Jean Dubuffet
• Template:Henri Fantin-Latour
• Template:Hippolyte Flandrin
• Template:François Gérard
• Template:Antoine-Jean Gros
• Template:Jean-Baptiste Greuze
• Template:Fernand Léger
• Template:Philip James de Loutherbourg
• Template:Ernest Meissonier
• Template:Pierre Puvis de Chavannes
• Template:Fleury François Richard
• Template:Hubert Robert
• Template:Claude-Joseph Vernet
• Template:Simon Vouet

German artist and architect navigational boxes

• Template:Albrecht Altdorfer
• Template:Hans Baldung
• Template:Max Beckmann
• Template:Joseph Beuys
• Template:Lovis Corinth
• Template:Otto Dix
• Template:Walter Gropius
• Template:George Grosz
• Template:Andreas Gursky
• Template:Ernst Ludwig Kirchner
• Template:Max Liebermann
• Template:August Macke
• Template:Emil Nolde
• Template:Neo Rauch
• Template:August Sander
• Template:Carl Spitzweg
• Template:Thomas Struth
• Template:Franz von Stuck
• Template:Franz Xaver Winterhalter
• Template:Johan Zoffany

Hungarian artist navigational boxes

• Template:Robert Capa

Irish artist navigational boxes

• Template:William Orpen

Italian artist and architect navigational boxes

• Template:Leon Battista Alberti
• Template:Antonello da Messina
• Template:Antonio del Pollaiuolo
• Template:Federico Barocci
• Template:Fra Bartolomeo
• Template:Pompeo Batoni
• Template:Domenico Beccafumi
• Template:Gentile Bellini
• Template:Bernardo Bellotto
• Template:Giovanni Boldini
• Template:Francesco Borromini
• Template:Donato Bramante
• Template:Bramantino
• Template:Filippo Brunelleschi
• Template:Agostino Carracci
• Template:Ludovico Carracci
• Template:Vittore Carpaccio
• Template:Cima da Conegliano
• Template:Carlo Crivelli
• Template:Domenichino
• Template:Duccio
• Template:Rosso Fiorentino
• Template:Gentile da Fabriano
• Template:Giovanni Fattori
• Template:Orazio Gentileschi
• Template:Giambologna
• Template:Francesco Guardi
• Template:Francesco Hayez
• Template:Filippo Juvarra
• Template:Giovanni Lanfranco
• Template:Filippino Lippi
• Template:Lorenzo Lotto
• Template:Bernardino Luini
• Template:Carlo Maderno
• Template:Simone Martini
• Template:Lorenzo Monaco
• Template:Giovanni Battista Moroni
• Template:Palma Vecchio
• Template:Pietro da Cortona
• Template:Piero di Cosimo
• Template:Giovanni Paolo Panini
• Template:Pinturicchio
• Template:Pisanello
• Template:Sebastiano del Piombo
• Template:Giambattista Pittoni
• Template:Mattia Preti
• Template:Guido Reni
• Template:Giulio Romano
• Template:Salvator Rosa
• Template:Jacopo Sansovino
• Template:Giovanni Girolamo Savoldo
• Template:Luca Signorelli
• Template:Cosmè Tura
• Template:Paolo Uccello
• Template:Luigi Vanvitelli
• Template:Giorgio Vasari

Norwegian artist navigational boxes

• Template:Johan Christian Dahl

Polish artist navigational boxes

• Template:Tamara de Lempicka

Russian artist and architect navigational boxes

• Template:Arkhip Kuindzhi
• Template:Carlo Rossi (architect)

Spanish artist navigational boxes

• Template:Ramon Casas
• Template:Jaume Plensa

Mistico Dois (talk) 18:20, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Maria Helena Vieira da Silva, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This was an error, for sure, the name of the museum is correct, and the reference too: [9]Mistico Dois (talk) 19:31, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page you created seems to be a translation from the French article. Please note that the Wikipedia license requires attribution when copying material. See WP:TFOLWP for more details; you can simply provide attribution by linking to the original source in the edit summary. Let me know if you need help. Broc (talk) 21:32, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Fireworks (Boldini). Broc, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Page seems translated from fr.wp but attribution is missing.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Broc}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Broc (talk) 21:33, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The attribution appears in Talk Page:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fireworks_(Boldini). Is there something else that is missing?Mistico Dois (talk) 23:53, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Oath on the Grütli. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 03:17, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Paul Mathias Padua. Dcotos, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work! Thank you.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dcotos}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dcotos (talk) 09:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Joan of Arc, Sick, Interrogated in Prison by the Cardinal of Winchester. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Good day! Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia by writing this article. I have marked the article as reviewed. Have a wonderful and blessed day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 11:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on The Cow with the Subtile Nose. Another editor, Rosiestep, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this article. This English language Wikipedia article appears to be a translation of the French language Wikipedia's article fr:La Vache au nez subtil.

If that is so, it is required to be "attributed" - please see Help:Translation#License requirements.

Please let me know if I can assist you with with this, or anything else related to the English language Wikipedia.

Lastly, did you know that English Wikipedia has a WikiProject dedicated to inter-wiki translations? You are warmly welcome to join the conversation at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Intertranswiki. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Rosiestep}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Rosiestep (talk) 13:59, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is attributed, both at the start of the entry, and at the Talk Page.Mistico Dois (talk) 15:47, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate it! I had a feeling I had executed the reordering incorrectly. Live and learn! 🆃🆁🆂™ 21:58, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Petra Wunderlich. Another editor, Netherzone, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

This photographer does not seem to meet GNG nor NARTIST criteria for inlusion. Please improve by adding independent secondary significant coverage.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Netherzone (talk) 14:28, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I added several references that I think demonstrates the photographer notability.Mistico Dois (talk) 15:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2024 July 14 § Museum collections on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Ham II (talk) 07:26, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistico Dois! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. In addition, I see that you're marking every single edit as minor, usually with the edit summary "minor edit", which is not useful. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 14:29, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your explanation. When I used to write minor edits, I meant like adding minor elements to the text, for example.Mistico Dois (talk) 16:01, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for fixing this. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:04, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family and Property. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 18:09, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of Wikipedians to better understand what draws administrators to contribute to Wikipedia, and what affects administrator retention. We will use this research to improve experiences for Wikipedians, and address common problems and needs. We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this anonymous survey.

You do not have to be an Administrator to participate.

The survey should take around 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement .

Please find our contact on the project Meta page if you have any questions or concerns.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 19:26, 23 October 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hi, is there really any point in adding Category:Low-importance Italy articles, which has over 50k articles, to paintings that aren't even in Italy? The Italian project won't be any help to them. Johnbod (talk) 03:35, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The place where they are isn't as much important as the country of the artist. Thats the point of that WP.Mistico Dois (talk) 18:11, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey here.

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2024 (UTC) [reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Mistico Dois. Thank you for your work on Country House in Hilversum. Another editor, Dclemens1971, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Great job!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Dclemens1971}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]