User talk:LOVI33

This is LOVI33's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Hey there, I would kindly ask you to stop reversing my changes on Dua Lipa's page. I am the family's acquaintance and it was Dua's Albanian grandmother that gave her the name, she does not have Bosnian descent.

Veneta1, if what you say is true, you are using a WP:COI account and could potentially be blocked considering you have been deleting that content for a while without participating in WP:BRD, and have been warned multiple times. LOVI33 22:33, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am using my regular account; I post and edit many pages here in many languages... Not spam. Veneta1 (talk) 22:46, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did get a message from this user on a private social media account, apologizing that they never got the chance to say goodbye to you and feeling the need to thank you for everything you've done for them. They are doing great now, studying at college which they've moved to permanently from Wiki. --K. Peake 06:58, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your work on = (album)! PopLizard86427 (talk) 23:38, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited = (album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 30 (Adele album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

LOVI, I must admit I'm very confused as to how somebody who just made something like 90 edits today alone qualifies as being semi-retired. In fact, your most recent 500 edits having all been made since September actually makes you significantly more active than many editors who aren't declared semi-retired. I've seen editors on here who've posted notices that they are semi-retired and be as active as you've been in the past few months alone questioned by admins as to how they are semi-retired so you may want to rethink whether you actually are or not. Not that anybody can force you to remove it but your actions don't align with what it's supposed to mean and represent. Ss112 18:31, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed. LOVI33 18:54, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please change your stance on this conversation to Oppose, I'd like to withdraw the request and need complete opposition to do that. Tree Critter (talk) 18:14, 1 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Tree Critter please see WP:CANVASS. LOVI33 13:39, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the one who made the request... I just want to withdraw, and you're the only Support. I'm not notifying you of the discussion, I just want to undo the discussion. Tree Critter (talk) 21:54, 2 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I thought you'd be interested to know that I have put this article up as a FAC, after you had previously commented when I was still getting Kids See Ghosts into this status! --K. Peake 17:08, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyle Peake I will review this article and put some comments up in the next couple of days. LOVI33 00:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You never got round to this, so I will let you know that the article is at FAC again if you wish to leave comments for the second attempt? --K. Peake 07:38, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sugar (Brockhampton song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sugar (Brockhampton song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sugar (Brockhampton song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Sugar (Brockhampton song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Sugar (Brockhampton song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:21, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Real Groove you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Real Groove you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Real Groove for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 08:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Real Groove you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Real Groove for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love Again (Dua Lipa song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 07:21, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dua Lipa - Love Again screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:44, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dua Lipa - We're Good still.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:53, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dua Lipa, Angèle - Fever still.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 15:57, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:When We All Fall Asleep, Where Do We Go? track listing has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:33, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Love Again (Dua Lipa song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Love Again (Dua Lipa song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:21, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Love Again (Dua Lipa song) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Love Again (Dua Lipa song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:42, 13 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good article nominations | June 2022 Backlog Drive

On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!

You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I Don't Miss You at All has been nominated for a community good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:58, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Pretty Please (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pretty Please (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Pretty Please (song) for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 20:03, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It has been more than two weeks since I placed this article on hold; any updates? --K. Peake 07:59, 31 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pretty Please (song) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Pretty Please (song) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kyle Peake -- Kyle Peake (talk) 06:42, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dua Lipa - Club Future Nostalgia screenshot.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. >> Lil-unique1 (talk) — 19:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dua Lipa- IDGAF.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:24, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dua Lipa - Be the One sample.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dua Lipa Blow Your Mind (Mwah) sample.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Dua Lipa - Hotter than Hell sample.ogg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of non-free use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of non-free use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable non-free use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable non-free use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have brought this article to a third FAC if you want to leave any comments please like you did for Kids See Ghosts? K. Peake 21:03, 19 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Dua Lipa featuring DaBaby - Levitating sample.ogg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. ✗plicit 13:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sabrina Carpenter Paris.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]