User talk:Jab843/Archive 4

I'm glad to see that neo-Nazis like you are doing a good job of preventing people from making constructive edits to the Wikipedia pages of your heroes. Keep up the good work! Hail victory!

Have you even opened the site ever. You are telling that there is nothing special. For your kind information Bike height is the world first site which give facility to upload your photo and you can generate a scene of you riding bike, it shows interactive lights, meter and engine. The technology is patent protected. You should be sincere to make comment on some reputed company. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikkik13 (talk • contribs) 18:50, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care what you think, I do this as a joke and I don't care about it. Leave me alone and let me eat my McDonalds in peace

I don't understand why you felt my edits weren't constructive. I'm a member of the Quapaw tribe and i was adding information to bring certain issues current. For example a number of our business and the full scope of our economic impact have changed drastically in the past five years but the current version does not reflect this. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ogahpah21 (talk • contribs) 06:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

First of all I gave dcheagle reliable information regarding venues of WWE ppv's in 2013. For him to accuse me of giving him false information is insulting to me and I resent it.Harryjunior1000 (talk) 21:43, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

you didn't make the edit in question so..... and I am not fully certain which edit you are referring to.... Jab843 (talk) 21:51, 14 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am using flier for cultural system. people need to view my information.

Dear Jab843, I'm trying to build a consensus on a revision of the History of Pizza entry. I've added a comment on the talk page for that entry under the original entry for cheese. Thank. Pg1945 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pg1945 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 15 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear i wnat to need your help for creating news pages of national heroes and history creators what i do plz tell me plz send me email. email thechunian@gmail.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thechunian (talk • contribs) 17:49, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

My point in editing the Lemmings page was that the procedure for nuking lemmings had not been explained. As that was the problem I was trying to solve when I found that page, it seemed like a serious omission. I was hoping someone would see what I'd written and add the relevant information.

There's a good chance someone playing Lemmings won't have access to any instructions - as I didn't, and still don't. The Lemmings wiki page misses an opportunity to explain the thing that needs explaining most - how to wind up a level that the player has completed, without having to wait for the clock to time out.

I got very frustrated trying to work out how to do that. Now that I know how, I'm happy to correct the page, but the idea that someone like you might just erase what I've written makes me reluctant to contribute to Wikipedia. I see you've had that effect on others too.

Regards,

Andy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.1.186.173 (talk) 14:50, 24 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand you frustration; however, wikipedia is not a place or resource for game instructions, your comment was "^{How ? By doing what?}." If you wish to learn more on the subject please post on the talk page of the article. The actual article is only for finalized edits not a place for posing questions. See forums or other resources for issues surrounding the game, also your edit was not very descriptive in encouraging individuals in contributing to this, once again please post items like this on the talk page as that is where it belongs. Wikipedia is a great resource, but only made so by constant vigilance by the community. Please see wikipedia guides for further questions. Jab843 (talk) 04:14, 25 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I believe "all branches of knowledge" includes game instructions, especially in an article about that game. Arbitrarily deciding what content should or should not be in Wikipedia is just snobbery, in my opinion. If an article about the game isn't considered too low brow for inclusion, why should including the necessary instructions be any different?

My addition was meant in the spirit of saying "reference needed" or "citation needed". I'd quite happily add the missing information, but clearly you prowl around Wikipedia deleting things that you personally feel are inappropriate, and you've already said you feel that would be, so I won't bother.

I refer you back to the title of this comment, and the definition of "encyclopedia" which is taken from "Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia". It does not define it as a set of dusty, leather bound books, found mouldering on a schoolmasters book shelves, though, to be fair, it does show a picture of one.

dude you posted the following comment, "New religion I came up with." under the page.... you claim that you invented the new religion... how this is relevant... I do not know... Also this edit was reverted in february... I think you are getting angry at the wrong person... Jab843 (talk) 03:40, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited. Please sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Atlanta 5. — Ganeshk (talk) 12:55, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Due to a security update to the wiki software, older versions of STiki are no longer functional. You've been identified as a user of STiki, and are kindly asked to upgrade to the current version at Wikipedia:STiki#Download before continuing with use of the tool. Continuing to use older versions will be detrimental to the STiki project. Please see Wikipedia talk:STiki#Errors for a discussion of this issue or to respond to this message. Thank you! 04:46, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

We are proud to announce that Igloo is once again functioning. This message was sent by TyAbot for Kangaroopower, one of Igloo's current maintainers at 20:31, 25 August 2013 (UTC).[reply]

You're invited! Please sign up at Wikipedia:Meetup/Atlanta/Atlanta 7. To unsubscribe from these alerts, please remove your name from this page. — Ganeshk (talk) 01:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ML, I am alive and human. Cheers.

Jab843 (talk) 02:41, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done ident diff Welcome back ! Mlpearc (open channel) 02:50, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Incentive solutions. I do not think that Incentive solutions fits any of the speedy deletion criteria  because "included on the Inc. 5000 list of the 5000 fastest growing companies in America in 2012" is a claim of notability. I request that you consider not re-tagging Incentive solutions for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES ^(talk) 01:15, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

one of the 5000 fastest growing companies in america? If that is notable enough for you fair enough; however, that IMHO is hardly notable, but that is where we differ, I see no reason to tag it for speedy deletion at this point and I would not re-tag a page where the csd is removed for a valid justification. Upon searching for the company on my own, before adding that template, there seemed to be no mention of it any where on the internet, and on Alexa, I had essentially zero ranking. But despite that, if you think that the single statement of how it is among (Also, INC is a PAID service that provides ranking, it is not like forbes that is independent or other similar agencies. But if you believe it is valid to make the contention that a company is notable merely because they paid to be included on a list, then by all means do so) the quickest growing companies in america, then by all means do so. Jab843 (talk) 01:51, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't ever say it was notable, a "claim if significance" is a much lower bar. A mere hint of possible notability is enough to mean that a single tagger and a single admin aren't enough, a discussion that allows others to weigh in and possibly establish notability is needed. An AfD might well delete this, I am not saying that notability is thoroughly established. Please get the distinction between notability and "claim of significance" clear. Notability requires sources as a rule, a CoS does not. Notability establishes that an article should not be deleted, a CoS merely says there may be something worth looking into before deciding to delete. This has often been discussed at WT:CSD. DES ^(talk) 02:08, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thank you for clarification on the distinction between the two as I was not aware of the significant distinction. As always, I seemingly learn more from Wikipedia after more edits. Jab843 (talk) 02:11, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite welcome, many experienced editors get confused on this point. DES ^(talk) 02:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Teahouse Host Badge
	Awarded to hosts at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Experienced editors with this badge have committed to welcoming guests, helping new editors, and upholding the standards of the Teahouse by giving friendly and patient guidance—at least for a time. Hosts illuminate the path for new Wikipedians, like Tōrō in a Teahouse garden. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
I hope you enjoy helping people with the simple things they ask as much as I do. I think you will. :) — {{U|Technical 13}} (t • e • c) 22:17, 10 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[1]

What do we usually do in this situation? Re-nominate for deletion rather than merger, this time asking the Black hole editors for input? Rolf H Nelson (talk) 04:36, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Typically, we would merge in this situation as the topic is related and doesn't need deletion, that or a redirect should be preformed. Jab843 (talk) 14:26, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't a merge leave us with a redirect from "Planck star" to "Black hole"? That's problematic because the black hole article doesn't, and currently shouldn't, mention Planck stars at all, which is liable to confuse the reader. Rolf H Nelson (talk) 08:01, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In re to this teahouse topic, issues Copyright issues, how would a person make a timeline unique? I understand about content like paragraphs and what not, but how would you make a time line unique? It is dates followed by a few word descriptions.... Edit here [2]. Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 14:24, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Almost all the information in the timeline has effectively been incorporated into the article as it currently looks. It's been mixed up with info with other sources, which is a good thing as encyclopedia articles are meant to combine multiple sources into a digested summary for readers. Prose is also generally preferred to bullet points as Wikipedia is an encyclopedia rather than a database. --LukeSurl ^{t c} 14:34, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for updating the protection on the article! Only thing I wanted to comment on is that this is the second time that the page has been protected. But 2-weeks should be sufficient, if not we will revisit it again. Thanks once again! Jab843 (talk) 03:03, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, 1 week then two weeks is a fairly standard escalation pattern, but next time I suspect it'll get a least a month. GedUK  12:37, 30 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please clarify why you put the POV template on the background section, as the section on the talk page that you referenced in a later edit doesn't pertain to neutrality, so much as the validity of a graph, which isn't in the section. Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 00:50, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

additionally, why did you add yet another "template" of citation needed in the introduction, it is a work in progress, but I would think it is clear that the current conflict stems from the events listed and those are cited as occurring in 2014, please give some rational for adding this addendums, because as I see it, the two you have added are without merit. Please let me know. Jab843 (talk) 16:01, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The section in its current form does not meet WP:NPOV per Gever tov's issue: "The rocket attacks on southern Israel during 2012-2014, prior to the subject conflict play a important role in the decision of Israel to attack. How can we include this fact in the Background section?"

Regarding the citation tag - agreed, the article is a work in progress, but that assertion is far from clear. It needs a source or should be deleted per WP:CS Spud770 (talk) 16:09, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I've been keeping an eye on the 2014 Israel–Gaza conflict page and some of your recent edits have caught my attention. (1 2) I wanted to remind you that 1RR applies to any revert, even if it is for different content. Please be more careful in the future or it may lead at a block. Feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Best, Mike V • Talk 17:04, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The second revision on the page was in regards to Wikipedia:Vandalism#Sneaky_vandalism, "adding plausible misinformation", seemed to me that adding in "claim" to a specific figure quoted, seemed to fall under this category, and was reverted under AGF in the hopes that it wasn't vandalism. In this case, it had a deliberate intent of causing the reader to question the source of the information (selectively taking a source as opposed to adding to all)without any evidence that the source was to be questioned. In regards to the first revision, the intention was to stop an edit war from occurring, and in a normal situation, the SOP is usually (obviously each situation is different) to revert to its original state and warn the users involved. I can see now that is not the best tactic to use in these situations. Sorry if that isn't the case. Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 21:31, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You instantly reverted my removal of the expat restaurant section of that article. We're not a travel guide and we're not interested in reviews of restaurants. It was not vandalism- it's something out of scope which needed to be removed. Secretlady (talk) 21:37, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, I apologize, I have undone my edit and will do the same on your talk page shortly Jab843 (talk) 21:40, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

While the source for the line in the header description is legitimate, the context of it does not seem reasonable or appropriate for the page. No statistics or other corroborating information is included which would indicate health risks of a standardized, commercially produced kombucha product.

Quoted via the CDC website, "FDA has evaluated the practices of the commercial producers of the Kombucha mushroom and has found no pathogenic organisms or hygiene violations (5). However, because the tea is produced under varying conditions in individual homes, contamination with pathogenic organisms such as Aspergillus is possible." http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/00039742.htm

I could find no references suggesting commercially produced kombucha associated with any health problems. The problematic issues arise from kombucha produced at home with no regulation. This should be noted in the wiki page as there are many food products (alcohol, cheese, cured meats, etc.) that are potentially dangerous when produced non-commercially and in the absence of a regulatory body, but which are perfectly safe when properly produced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.53.53.138 (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you are saying, that said, the article from ACS does indeed state what is in the lead of the article. Also, seeing as kombucha is typically made at home, and a majority is not commercially produced, it seems that the sentence is indeed valid. If you wish to find a reference that suggests the problem can be found in home-brew, I suggest that you add it to the health section. Another thing that I would like to add is that kombucha is not under the FDA's direct supervision and is sold as a supplement and as such doesn't have to follow stringent regulation. I suggest that you take this to the talk page and see what sort of response that you get, if not, it would be best to add that information, as opposed to removing other information. Any questions feel free to respond here! Jab843 (talk) 05:41, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I still believe the current information on the page is misleading but I do not want to spend any more time on this. I will leave it as is and let it work itself out amongst other users who are more invested in the issue than I am.

73.53.53.138 (talk) 06:01, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please explain the relevance of adding "she has so far deftly avoided issues as to her current religious orientation"?, apart from missing citations to support this assertion, ultimately, does it add anything to the article? Are you trying to assert that she is no longer practicing? Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 18:52, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you remove the information about his stance on health insurance or controversy over advertised claims? As I don't see a valid reason, and there was no edit summary provided. Jab843 (talk) 19:10, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

why did you remove my editing of the true name of the band leader — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davegrohlisjesus (talk • contribs) 02:43, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus is not the leader of the band. Jab843 (talk) 02:46, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted the behavioural section because it is not scientifically proven or sound and is bias information. It perpetuates sexist and outdated ideas regarding female hormonal behavior. If there is to be information regarding such a socially sensitive topic it should remain scientific not the bias musings of a professor of psychology without independent peer reviewed data. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.32.1.24 (talk) 19:42, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that instead of simply removing the section, you instead verify that there is no other information available. Also, "perpetuates sexist and outdated ideas"? The book was published just over 3 years ago. Also, "without independent peer reviewed data", please see the following citations, ^[1][2] The second of the articles has 2 pages of references, and is peer reviewed. This ^[3] one is from Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, and is also peer reviewed and verified. I am also including this one.^[4] As you can see, there is a large amount of peer reviewed journals that support the premise outlined by Roy Baumeister. I suggest that we work together on improving this section in the article, but simply removing it is not the solution. I will be more than happy to help.

Jab843 (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please see talk page here where this is being discussed so that the community can be involved. Jab843 (talk) 02:12, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When I state there is no independent peer reviewed data, that means the studies done by Roy Baumeister and associates have not been replicated and reviewed by reputable journals. The studies you have linked are similar not the same and do not review Roy Baumeisters work. The independent peer reviewed data in PLOS One journal does not provide evidence for what is written on the luteal phase 'behavioural effects' it proves ONLY that women who suffer from premenstrual syndrome (which is a disorder not every woman suffers with pms)"affects the parallel execution of emotional and cognitive processing" specifically when dealing with stress. "Only women with PMS demonstrated an increase in physiological and subjective stress measures during the luteal menstrual cycle phase."Read resuts Which does not correlate with women in general losing self control and going on 'shopping sprees' (clearly an unscientific and sexist statement. I also suggest researching the reliability of the open source journal. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/concern-over-tacit-conflicts-of-interest-in-plos-one-peer-reviews/2010908.article Removing the information stops anyone from being misinformed. By leaving the information there, it is perpetuating misinformation and it is more important to leave out false data then to leave it there whilst awaiting scientifically sound information.

Simply because the book was written 3 years ago does not mean it can not perpetuate sexism, review Roy Baumeisters academic history and interests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelatheia (talk • contribs) 05:24, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the content per your concerns, will you help me work on this section? Jab843 (talk) 05:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I would be more than happy too. I will type up a draft tomorrow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aelatheia (talk • contribs) 09:17, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I've never written on a Wikipedia page before, but I am asking that discourse about the mood changes be added to the page. It is not "sexist" to provide research on the connections between emotional fluctuations and hormone shifts. As a female, I would like to better understand what is going on during the cycle and pregnancy. Calling such research "sexist" means that there may be less research and medical attention given to women's reproductive health, including PMDD and postpartum depression. The hormonal changes postpartum are dramatic and have, for some, dramatic behavioral consequences. Research on the effects of hormonal changes in the luteal phase are equally worth recognizing in research and on the wiki page. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 100.33.22.237 (talk) 17:30, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Creation Museum. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 6 August 2014 (UTC)  DoneJab843 (talk) 02:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

LOL... If you think my edits aren't constructive, then let's see what you can do with that mess! 72.16.17.161 (talk) 03:35, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Or are you just a robot? =P

Please see this useful tutorial on editing wikipedia in the correct fashion Wikipedia:Tutorial. Jab843 (talk) 03:39, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redskins Page - please see http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/redskin. The dictionary says it is offensive. It is. Thoughts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.193.163.87 (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 10 August 2014 (UTC) DoneJab843 (talk) 03:44, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Nice job in removal of vandalism. You beat me to one and this one. (Both times, I had just finished reverting and it said this revision has already been reverted) ;) NickGibson3900 - Talk - Sign my Guestbook 04:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My edit on gastro whatever cavity was constructive. Please review it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.111.160.226 (talk) 05:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I am in agreement and have undone the revision. Jab843 (talk) 05:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you and I'm sorry I forgot to sign my post earlier. 74.111.160.226 (talk) 08:17, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jab843, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I have converted the speedy deletion tag that you placed on Anniversary themes to a proposed deletion tag. The speedy deletion criteria are extremely narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 12:35, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I thought CSD was for articles that were not significant? Can a custom CSD not be used for this? Also, wouldn't this be more appropriate to be on the dictionary project, if anywhere? Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 20:10, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You should read the criteria I linked in detail. The conditions are quite specific and you must match them or else it cannot be deleted in this manner. In those cases you must use either WP:AFD or WP:PROD Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 21:23, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jab843: I'm taking this from the Tea to here. Sorry I cannot get always back to you immediately, I work outside the home and with today being Sunday in my part of the world, I was a little more busy than usual. Thank you for your attempt to correct Signedzzz's attempts to write without inserting modifiers and descriptors to sentences resulting in supposed neutrality actually colored in a specific direction as well as taking partial quotes out of context to color meaning rather than making a statement and letting readers find more info by checking references. When I looked at the page just now, I saw new comments by you and he as well as a warning from somebody named, Sarah(talk). I am sorry he made angry and hurtful comments towards you, too. That seems to be how he keeps shutting down discussions. Thank you for trying, though. Taram (talk) 04:02, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Taram Don't worry, and don't let this stuff get to you, it is only a website at the end of the day (a helpful and great site), but a site none the less. As far as the status, I have notified the projects associated with the article. The wheels are moving, but please be patient. These things can take some time. Anything further, please do reply here! Best Jab843 (talk) 04:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Jab843 (talk)!

Jab843 (talk), I saw your post at the WikiProject Catholicism talk page. I commented about the levels of importance and quality as described by members of the project at the Magdalene asylum Talk Page. Though it does not jive with the established levels, Signedzzz insists that "his" page is of "High" importance. I believe that it is not because of the rating scale used by the project, but because to him (I suppose it could be a her, also) it is personally important. I understand his/her logic in the grand scheme of things, but not as a project rating. I just wonder how s/he thinks this 20th century event is of greater importance than the flioque clause and the world wide effect that carried over centuries. (I thought it was quite generous to put it on par with the filioque clause.) Hmmmm.... Oh well. Taram (talk) 17:11, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I literally got the information off the page for python and the hollywood bowl — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.53.102.44 (talk) 02:52, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

which page are you referring to? Jab843 (talk) 02:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi ,I found your message here. I edited the article on Korean cancer biologist Incheol Shin because I am Incheol Shin himself. There are actually two Incheol Shin in our Institute (Hanyang University, Seoul Korea), the one in Medical college is Inchul Shin (please notice the difference in spelling, he was born in 1958) and myself in Dept of Life Science, College of Natural Science (born in 1968). I found the article is about myself but the birth year indicated is another Inch'u'l Shin in our Institute. Do I need to prove that I am real Incheol Shin to correct the error ? Thank you

You can check the details here. http://www.hanyang.ac.kr/english/

Incheol Shin Professor Dept of Life Science Hanyang Univ Seoul, Korea — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.104.53.139 (talk) 06:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I spent quite a while attempting to verify the information and couldn't find it on google or the university site. That said, I don't know korean :(. Is there a page for you on the korean site that I can link? Also, is there a site with your birth information that I can verify it with? I'll double check with otrs on this matter. After checking with OTRS, could you please email info-en@wikimedia.org from an official address so that they can verify you? Also, it would greatly help if you had an account, as it is difficult to track or verify IP addresses. I can help with the account creation if you need it. Jab843 (talk) 16:16, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I redirected this duplicate stub to the existing article. Bearian (talk) 22:59, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jab843 (talk) 10:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Policy. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• MrPaulHarrisJr (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Duncan Harrison Jr. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I am confused as to why this page was rejected. I did review the standards set for pages, but then I found these pages of politicians who most Americans would consider to be non-notable. But they still have pages, as sitting Council members. And I am sure if I did a little more research I could find hundreds of others.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kwanza_Hall https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alex_Wan https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Norwood https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eddie_Osborne https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gayle_Chaneyfield-Jenkins https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carlos_M._Gonzalez

Trenton, NJ is the capital of one of the wealthiest states in NJ. We are one of the oldest cities in the nation. We were the Capital of this nation for a short time. And many a battles were fought here during the Revolutionary War. So providing space to our elected officials would seem to make sense, given our rich and "notable" history.

Paul Harris Jr. (talk) 15:04, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I trust you aren't referring to the need for a "source" when I claim that paragraph X contradicts paragraph Y, if it self-evidently does. I just added a reference to Sean Hannity's TV broadcast. Meanwhile, if you're only interested in the racist, viz., pro-Black, viewpoint, then don't leave the page publicly editable, but put the standard Wikipedia slightly-to-the-left-of-Andy-Warhol spin on it and protect it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.49.1.133 (talk) 18:14, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Whether an article is about grilled cheese sandwiches, beer, or the phases of the moon, they all have to source their information in some sort of fashion. We are working on getting the page changed to semi-protected status, but these process can take a bit of time. If you could please add your reference, we wouldn't have an issue with the addition. Jab843 (talk) 18:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unacceptable that the article is an advertisement and you deleting the criticism. You are basically backing their ad and lie.

I am Manya and the information that you are editing about me is incorrect. False film news cannot be credible sources. Please stop adding wrong information about me that can affect my personal life. My DOB is wrong, the facts about my father are wrong! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Manyabjp (talk • contribs) 18:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There are two issues, 1) edit warring on wikipedia is not acceptable and you have violated 3RR on a number of occasions today. 2) If you wish to edit as being the individual in question and not have sources referenced as others need, you will need to identify with WP:OTRS to ensure that you are indeed the subject in the article. None of the personal details will be revealed and any documentation will be destroyed once/if you are verified. This is their email address, info-en@wikimedia.org, and they can help you from there, reference this talk page if desired. Jab843 (talk) 18:43, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jab843 I would be more than glad to be adopted and mentored by you hoping to hear from you soon. Thanks in advance--Rberchie (talk) 23:29, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Treats!. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:02, 18 August 2014 (UTC)  Done 02:30, 18 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:WikiProject Biography. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:11, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I need you to reply to my reply to your rejection of the page I created.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Duncan_Harrison_Jr.

Thanks...Paul Harris

Sorry for the delay, college just started up again, I'll give you a full response later on today! 14:06, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

In my personal opinion, it has not been asserted why he is notable. Please see the policy here and here. See that only on the national level is someone automatically considered notable. For example, there are a number of mayors that are not notable enough to have a page. Also, his council position is "member at large" if you could detail as to why that is NOTABLE and not only significant, that would be a great help. Please see the section on city councilors in the second link. I am not saying that he isn't notable or can't be addressed as such, I am merely saying that there has not been an assertion as to why he is notable.

has he won any national awards? Are there any events that he has been involved in that have gained significant coverage? A cursory look through wikipedia articles will reveal that next to no council members that are "at large" have an article. I am not saying that he can not have an article, just there isn't anything to assert his notability. Please reply here with further questions. Jab843 (talk) 02:47, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Criteria for speedy deletion. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 30 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Volunteer Response Team/Userright RfC. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

not to be rude, but why do you keep deleting my post? people have a right to know what the episodes are called. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gallavich4ever (talk • contribs) 04:41, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You reverted edits made by user 2602:306:etc. (that's not me) on the Design Thinking page. The previous edits do seem to me to have been genuine edits to correct/improve grammar and/or spelling. The use of 'thru' instead of 'through' is widely regarded as very informal spelling, so I don't understand why you reverted those changes, and similarly with the changes to putting hyphens instead of semi-colon and 'lying' instead of 'laying'. All the changes made by 2602:306:etc. seem to me to have been improvements to the spelling and grammar, so I'd like to undo your revert edits. I hope that's OK with you. Sincerely, Nigel Cross Nigel Cross (talk) 13:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Yes indeed it is OK! Thanks for asking :) Jab843 (talk) 00:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Track listing. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 9 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Traditional marriage. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 13 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2014 September 28. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Icons. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 29 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Lead section. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Neutral point of view. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see WP:Requests for comment#Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jab843. This message is part of a mass mailing to people who appear active in reviewing articles for creation submissions. First of all, thank you for taking part in this important work! I'm sorry this message is a form letter – it really was the only way I could think of to covey the issue economically. Of course, this also means that I have not looked to see whether the matter is applicable to you in particular.

The issue is in rather large numbers of copyright violations ("copyvios") making their way through AfC reviews without being detected (even when easy to check, and even when hallmarks of copyvios in the text that should have invited a check, were glaring). A second issue is the correct method of dealing with them when discovered.

If you don't do so already, I'd like to ask for your to help with this problem by taking on the practice of performing a copyvio check as the first step in any AfC review. The most basic method is to simply copy a unique but small portion of text from the draft body and run it through a search engine in quotation marks. Trying this from two different paragraphs is recommended. (If you have any question about whether the text was copied from the draft, rather than the other way around (a "backwards copyvio"), the Wayback Machine is very useful for sussing that out.)

If you do find a copyright violation, please do not decline the draft on that basis. Copyright violations need to be dealt with immediately as they may harm those whose content is being used and expose Wikipedia to potential legal liability. If the draft is substantially a copyvio, and there's no non-infringing version to revert to, please mark the page for speedy deletion right away using {{db-g12|url=URL of source}}. If there is an assertion of permission, please replace the draft article's content with {{subst:copyvio|url=URL of source}}.

Some of the more obvious indicia of a copyvio are use of the first person ("we/our/us..."), phrases like "this site", or apparent artifacts of content written for somewhere else ("top", "go to top", "next page", "click here", use of smartquotes, etc.); inappropriate tone of voice, such as an overly informal tone or a very slanted marketing voice with weasel words; including intellectual property symbols (™,®); and blocks of text being added all at once in a finished form with no misspellings or other errors.

I hope this message finds you well and thanks again you for your efforts in this area. Best regards--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC).[reply]

       Sent via--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:20, 18 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Objectivity/DB. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:05, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Civility. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated. For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:07, 28 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jab843,

I recently came across editing my first article(stub) on Wikipedia. I would like to expand my knowledge about editing Wikipeida and other projects. Broadly speaking, my interests lie in Science and Technology but I am open to other fields too. I am also interested in the development side of the projects. So kindly adopt me.

Regards,

--HB (talk) 04:48, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the response. I am starting here from scratch, I am familiar with basic editing only and have fair idea about wikipedia's philosophy, haven't experienced the different ways with which I can contribute. I read that detecting vandalism requires you to first do some course on it. But I haven't gone through any course. Broad areas of interest are Computers, Geography, Technology, Physics, IT, Web, Indian polity. I would be consistent but not very active, as I am busy with some other jobs too. I would be happy to provide almost any type of contribution. Please suggest me tasks as per your experience.--HB (talk) 09:15, 31 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I think I should start with vandalism and patrolling, as there is a lot that I need to familiarize with, and with time I will try my hands on article creation too. Yes I like writing but I am not sure whether I would have enough time for that. So, please continue with the Vandalism patrol. --HB (talk) 15:58, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollback 2015. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Bloody Saturday (photograph). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Linking. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:03, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Ban appeals reform 2015. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:06, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Ottendorfer Public Library and Stuyvesant Polyclinic Hospital. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at WP:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability. Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:08, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films). Should you wish to respond, your contribution to this discussion will be appreciated.

For tips, please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment § Suggestions for responding. If you wish to change the frequency or topics of these notices, or do not wish to receive them any longer, please adjust your entries at feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just came across your profile on list of adopters. I have been active on Wiki for some time now and have made 3 4 edits. I want to learn and contribute to this community. Can you please help me by adopting me. Thanks -Sandeep — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jyoti281085 (talk • contribs) 19:32, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, You participated in the previous Persondata RfC. I just wanted to notify you that a new RfC regarding the methodical removal of Persondata is taking place at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Thanks, —Msmarmalade (talk) 08:01, 6 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Wikipediholism test. Thanks. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c) 06:30, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft page edited as you requested. 185.54.163.95 (talk) 22:19, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm looking to help re-activate the Percy Jackson Task-force. As you are one of the few members still actively editing Wikipedia, I wanted to extend an invitation for you to work with me to do this. If you are no longer interested, I'd appreciate your taking the time to remove your username from the "Active" list here. And thanks for all you did before!

If you are interested, I would also ask you to consider a proposal I have, which is that this task-force become the "Rick Riordan" task-force. I've suggested this because I think it would help keep the project active and also help stop some pretty widespread vandalism in articles referring to that author. My proposal in brief. I'm a relatively new Wikipedian, so I'd appreciate the advice and expertise of a more experienced user. Thanks again in advance, and feel free to contact me on my Talk page. 2ReinreB2 (talk) 03:56, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Type 054A frigate. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Talk page guidelines. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 31 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Navbox. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Roku. Legobot (talk) 00:07, 8 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Paid-contribution disclosure. Legobot (talk) 00:05, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Paid-contribution disclosure. Legobot (talk) 00:02, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Faith healing. Legobot (talk) 00:03, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have been a wikipedia user for a very long time. Recently I thought of contributing to the community by becoming an active editor/contributor to wikipedia. As I am particularly new to editing here would you kindly help me get up to speed with the various tools available and the necessary basics on how to properly edit/create wikipedia articles? --Abiswas25 (talk) 08:30, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Thanks for the kind advice on how to get started.

Yeah as you noticed my account is very new and the reason is I never knew that these opportunities existed in Wikipedia before now. I have been using it for a very long time and whenever I noticed any discrepancy/mistake/shortcoming in any article I used to correct it/append to it (as a guest user as I did not have an account). I have never written an article in Wikipedia before as I did not know of these opportunities then.

So, when I found out about all these vast possibilities I was interested in digging deeper and if possible contribute to Wikipedia. What I am basically looking to do is continue editing any article which I come across if needed (something which I was already doing before, albeit without an account) and also, now that I know of these other possibilities, contribute new articles and also fix vandalism (mainly because I have myself come across articles which have stupid things written which I can now safely guess must have been attempts at vandalism).

Finally, can you direct me to a page (if there is any of the kind) which lists the topics which are not complete or which needs expanding so that I can choose the ones which interest me (or I have sufficient knowledge about to expand).

Warm Regards, Abiswas25 (talk) 03:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Jab843, just checking up on your July invitation to rejoin the Percy Jackson Task-force. Please do not feel pressured in any way to decide, but be aware that your username has been moved to the "Unknown" section of our members list, should you ever go looking for it. Thanks again for your past work, and happy editing! --2ReinreB2 (talk) 01:40, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

== adoption == hi can you be my adopter nms642 (talk) 13:38, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am a new user seeking adoption. I have been waiting to get adopted so someone can tell me all about wikipedia. Thanks, Spike789 ^Talk 21:11, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electronic cigarette. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jab, Dan Marsala is the lead singer for both bands "Story Of The Year" and "The Fuck Off And Dies". They are associated acts. Please reinstate my edit.

Hi Jab843! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 01:22, Friday, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

I assume the edit was reverted because of the removed wiki-links. I removed the ones there as they were not directly related to the topic of the page. The court case is about freedom of association involving gay people in the United States. Those links were to same-sex marriage pages. But I do think that the court case box that I put on the page is appropriate in ever way. Please allow the court box to be reverted and permanent. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:4705:B92B:B5DC:4669:3549:DF46 (talk) 16:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Blocking policy. Legobot (talk) 00:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I can't seem to find this one, but you're the copyright expert. I know the man who wrote those words verbatum. How can I get his permission to use them — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joseph101895 (talk • contribs) 03:30, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joy Jab843 (talk) 03:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ok i will — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.195.72.132 (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know why you thought I was vandalising. (I assume it's because of the seemingly redundant use of prefixes in the word — it does look jarring, I admit.) It's the actual name (British term) for what Americans call two hundred fifty-sixth note. It is very rare, yes but it doesn't make it any less valid. A simple Google search yields hundreds of results to music theory sites that define this term. --78.171.145.229 (talk) 04:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

fixed, thanks! Jab843 (talk) 04:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, have a nice day! --78.171.145.229 (talk) 04:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I was wondering if you could explain to me why you proposed this page to be deleted. I look forward to working with you to help resolve this matter as soon as possible. Thank youNmazz (talk) 09:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Nmazz I am willing to work with you in any way I can to improve my article and edit it so it fits the Wikipedia:Notability as well as the Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines. I would also like to refer to the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jonathan Paul Wagner for my further defense of my sources. I look forward working with you on this issue Sincerely, Nmazz (talk) 20:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)Nmazz[reply]

Ok, let us see what we can do. My main concern is wondering if the subject matter is notable. A vast majority of sources are from youtube, and the others are local papers. A search on google news reveals essentially no sources. I find it difficult to see how he is notable, if you could please describe why on the deletion page. You can put text sources, they don't have to all be online resources, but that is better if you can provide a link. Having searched a number of databases, he simply does not appear. Can you summarize, in brief, why is he notable? He just seems like another artist to me. Best! Jab843 (talk) 21:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jonathan Wagner has worked with a number of notable figures in the past years such as the American dance museum where he worked with them collaborating on there first ever exhibition and also partipation in there panel discussion for the exhibition Link to a recording of the discusion: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kQ69ZU9b3f0 He has also worked with the peter tosh estate where he was a featured artist at peter tosh day 2015 celebrated at the Denver Cannabis Cup: https://www.facebook.com/PeterTosh/photos/a.160215761767.116692.160185436767/10153197566256768/?type=3&theater His art, the New York skyline as well as various other paintings was also featured in the background of an interview with legendary DJ Marley Marl: http://www.fox5ny.com/entertainment/33243540-story In addition His art has been featured at numerous exhibitions at notable museums such as this one that took place at the Whitney museum: http://www.styleweekly.com/richmond/show-starter/Content?oid=1376043Nmazz (talk) 02:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Nmazz[reply]

I appreciate all of your advice thus far I have taken your advice seriously and have updated my sources and content to show Wikipedia:Notability I would like to ask if my article can be reviewed to see if any other edits need to made or if it complies with Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines and if so how I can get the tag removed from the top of the page?Nmazz (talk) 23:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Nmazz[reply]

Dear Jab843

I created the Rail Operating Centre page - thanks for restoring the deleted Signalling History section. Interesting to note that people who do not login are quite happy to go along and delete without giving good reason.

Thanks again and have a nice day. The joy of all things (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spike789 ^Talk 16:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disavian (talk) 23:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). Legobot (talk) 00:06, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Caste system in India. Legobot (talk) 00:06, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Cookie Monster is really one of the most famous monsters of all time --67.80.62.61 (talk) 22:36, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Dinosaurs really are Muppets --67.80.62.61 (talk) 22:38, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You left me a message after reverting a modification I made on the "opium page" in the "music" section. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Opium&diff=prev&oldid=693336184 I made this change because the title of the "song" is originally in French, so the original title is in effect "Symphonie Fantastique" (not "Symphony Fanstastique" as it was). You could go to the page of that song by Berlioz, you'll see the name of the symphony is in French so it's titled "Symphonie Fantastique". I'm french, that's why I wanted to correct this.

Spike789 ^Talk 23:46, 2 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kim Jong-un. Legobot (talk) 00:08, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JAB, about the image of the stoneage article, it is in my browser much to long on the right side. problem just in this article. greatings --93.184.30.196 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The completed edit was to change the biased language used in the discussion of his stance on abortion. "his belief" is much more of a biased linguistic choice than "independently verifiable scientific research". 67.171.176.236 (talk) 06:36, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There is not a single peer reviewed article that I could find that supports your assertion. Yes it is linguistically biased, but there is no verification in scientific research, you can't change something just to suit an agenda. Can you provide a single peer reviewed article that asserts your position? Jab843 (talk) 15:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Spike789 ^Talk 16:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:2015 administrator election reform/Phase II/RfC. Legobot (talk) 00:09, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]