User talk:HD86

Well I'm glad my comments helped and it's good to take a break and take care of real life every once and a while. I would suggest though that you strike out the word "liar" from your comment on my page, since WP:NPA does not allow us to call people names, even when we think it's true. Tiamut^talk 01:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Not Muslim myself, but I've been celebrating with family and friends. Right back at you. Tiamut^talk 01:54, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HD86! Thanks for replying on the discussion forum of Muslim conquest of Egypt. I would like to move the article to Muslim invasion of Egypt. I believe this is a more neutral title, and it's in accordance with the names of other articles concerning the history of Egypt, such as French invasion of Egypt, Byzantine alliance and invasion of Egypt, French Invasion of Egypt (1798), Crusader invasions of Egypt etc. What do you think? --Bomba999 (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey man how's it going, well anyways ..this survey might interest you please read it and vote for neutrality Talk:Syrian occupation of Lebanon.George Al-Shami (talk) 05:56, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

First, accept my apologies regarding the changes made in the article of Aleppo, I've never meant to bother you, only tried to wikify the section. But please do not measure things on racial basis by saying "Syrian" way and so on... at least the "Syrian way" is better than the "US way" which relies on wars and "American fascism" in solving problems. Kevorkmail (talk) 05:13, 21 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, I'm not asking for your arbitrations on my edits, because we are all working for the improvement of this article. Regarding my "meaningless edits" as you have described, I think it is "meaningless" even to discuss such an issue with you, because you have shown your impolite behaviour towards me for the second time. Just go to the edit history and you will find that I am the one who created more than 50% of the sections in the subject article. Try to be polite while expressing your thoughts. You even do not deserve the apology I have asked in my last message. Kevorkmail (talk) 20:26, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you insisting to use the term Syrian isntead of Syriac? Give me a reasonabale answer or I will change back to Syriac. Kevorkmail (talk) 10:35, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello HD86. In your report at AN3 you do not say which article Kevorkmail is edit warring on. The report may be removed from the board if it is too vague. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:26, 24 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبا خيو، أنا حابب أفتح معك صفحة جديدة و أتعاون معك لأنو انت باين عليك زلمة فهمان، و أنا من جهتي نسيت الاساءات يللي وجهتلي ياهون و بتمنى انت كمان تنسى الاساءات يللي طلعت مني و كمان اسلوب الاديتينغ تبعي يللي يمكن كانت مستفزة شوي و على كل عفا الله عما مضى . و برجع بقلك انو ما كان هدفي اني استفزك و انما اضافة بعض الحقائق الاضافية مع مصادرها و يا ريت تتقبل مشاراكاتي بروح رياضية و كذلك وجهة نظري من دون تشنج . انا مبدئيا راح أنسحب من الموقع لأنو صار علي بلوك لمدة شهر و بعد كم يوم بتبلش اجازتي تبع اخر السنة و راح أسافر فيهون منشان أتعالج, يعني بكل الأحوال ما راح أفضى و بتمنى انو ما يضل بيني و بينك اي نوع من انواع التوتر. تقبل تحياتي, كيفورك. -- Kevorkmail (talk) 16:45, 25 November 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.100.99.165 (talk) [reply]

Hello, can you see the images in this website? [1] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 16:30, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No, it doesn't work.--HD86 (talk) 16:27, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is this to suggest that Quwatly was in fact the first (non-military) dictator in Syria? ;). Welcome back. Yazan (talk) 19:47, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Actually, yes. After reading Quwatly's history in more detail, it became clearer to me that he was closer to a corrupt feudal lord than to a democratically elected president. The 'democracy' of the 1940' in Syria was not democracy; it was very similar to the current Lebanese political system.HD86 (talk) 19:53, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While I agree in general with the statement (I've only read Sami Moubayed's biography of Quwatly, though), I doubt that you could call Quwatly an outright dictator, simply because he was still bound by all the in-fighting and contentions in his own parliament (Khalid al-Azm was a constant source of headache for him). It was certainly not a democracy, but it was not a dictatorship either, especially compared with what came later. Regards. Yazan (talk) 20:02, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You added many images to the Aleppo article, there is a conversation here about this: [2] --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 17:29, 31 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Central pattern generator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Respiration (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have merged eczema and dermatitis as they are different names for the same thing. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 15:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article has a long history of "attack" from people on both sides of the "Arab/Persian divide". Your recent objections (which I don't disagree with!) were recent additions that managed to sneak in through a series of unconstructive edits which were corrected piecemeal rather than straight reverted. Please, I would be grateful if you could read the article (especially the lead) as it is now (or WAS after my last edit if it has been further tampered with) - and if you still have any further questions, could you raise them specifically on the talk page. To get a better idea of what a pain this article has been to the people who have wished it well over the years - just have a look in the archive files!! Nonsense and unreferenced garbage that does get inserted in future is really better dealt with by reversion rather than tagging. Genuine concerns should be raised in talk. --Soundofmusicals (talk) 09:48, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kilis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian language. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HD86. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HD86. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HD86. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adib Shishakly (activist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adib Shishakly (activist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yabroq (talk) 20:21, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notifying of deletion of Manbij Plain Thepharoah17 (talk) 02:12, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Aleppo. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Also, since you took the information from the Ali Janbulad article, why didn't you add the reference(s) from that article as well? --Kansas Bear (talk) 16:37, 21 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Aintabli (talk) 18:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Aleppo. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.  // Timothy :: talk  22:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]