User talk:Fuseau/Archive20072011

Welcome!

Hello, Fuseau, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  Luksuh 23:23, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've read the paragraphs in cases you pointed to, none of these says that these candidates were pro-minoroty, only Podkolzina's case mentions her political views (it dosen't state what her views are though) and two isn't various. BTW certain level of command in Latvian was asked for eligibility - shouldn't it say eligibility to what ? ~~Xil * 22:02, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Do you see a need to find sources that describe "Equal Rights" (Ignatane) and National Harmony Party (Podkolzina) as pro-minority parties? I hesitate if this is debated, but we can look for sources - or just mention specific parties instead of "pro-minority".

two isn't various - in Podkolzina Para. 36, is written of the twenty-one candidates who had to provide certificates attesting to knowledge of the State language only nine, including the applicant, were required to sit a second examination. Sadly there is no mentioning of parties.

So I propose re-examinations of various candidates, at least sometimes unexpected, which prevented I. (ER) and P. (NHP) from participation (the two cases I've mentioned were unexpected - see Podkolzina Para. 10 and Ignatane Para 5.6.)

and if you find necessary eligibility to what? - then to Parliament and local councils. Aleksandrs Kuzmins (talk) 01:43, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did note that it mentioned 9 other candidates, however it dosen't give any further details, also note that 11 candidates didn't have to repeat the text. Why not just explain what the cases were about ? That would mean roughly the same and would make the article better as currently you haven't explained to the reader what is obvious to you - why do you suppose the reader should know who are these ladies, if all you say about them is that they were not eligibile ? ~~Xil * 11:27, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Explained in the article. Besides, I've found a source confirming that Podkolzina was then also from "Equal Rights" (List of NHP at 1998 elections was in fact list of the whole ForHRUL coalition). Aleksandrs Kuzmins (talk) 13:24, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it I just noticed that the picture used in article isn't properly licensed, maybe you have some images that could be used in article in case it gets deleted ? ~~Xil * 14:20, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are some (seen, for example, in ru:Русский язык в Латвии). Still, they aren't of best quality. Aleksandrs Kuzmins (talk) 20:23, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Latvian Centre for Human Rights, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Latvian Centre for Human Rights is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Latvian Centre for Human Rights, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:20, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Latvian Centre for Human Rights, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the article and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

K50 Dude (talk page)

After looking at the lv Wikipedia article on PCTVL, it struck me that since you have a WP:REALNAME, you might be accused of WP:COI in your edits of ForHRUL and related articles (e.g. Tatjana Ždanoka, etc.). For your own benefit, you might consider clarifying this situation on your user page, so as to protect yourself from possible future censure. Regards, Zalktis (talk) 08:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the attention. I consider that exactly the fact I don't hide my name (combined with the edicting according to WP:COI) shows my correct behaviour. Actually, links to my webpage are already provided on my ru: and lv: userpages. If you recommend so, I can add it here, too. Aleksandrs Kuzmins (talk) 21:50, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For clarity's sake this is probably the right thing to do. At the very least, it certianly shouldn't be to your detriment. —Zalktis (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for [1]. Such fact overviews are one of the few areas where Wikipedia can excel, and yet often neglected. Дигвурен Дигвурович_Аллё? 11:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice you've been doing some articles on UN jurisprudence from the HRC and in one case from CERD. Any chance of looking at the cases mentioned in the "jurisprudence" section of Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination? --IdiotSavant (talk) 12:22, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May be, if I will find something there especially interesting, but hardly in nearest future - there are some ECHR cases I plan to write about, and I feel I don't dedicate enough time for some things outside Wikipedia. If you wish to write about them, some CERD cases are collected here. And all of them should be in this database (Type - Jurisprudence). I suspect, that some still aren't - then it could be reasonable to look for them in (Type - Sessional/Annual Reports).Fuseau (talk) 18:17, 11 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this excellent article. Are you by any chance an English or Scots lawyer? I have a few collaborations going. Other than that, if you've got European topics to write about, I've got a stack of textbooks. Thanks, Ironholds (talk) 22:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Thank you 2. No, I'm a jurist from Latvia. 3. No specific plans now, but I do write regularly on ECtHR landmark cases.Fuseau (talk) 23:04, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with your edit here (although youtube is a bit dubious as a source), but may I suggest that if you make any similar edits that you should use a completely normal edit summary that simply outlines the change ("added political views"). WP:DENY should be strongly applied, and any added material should be in your own words and should use sources that you have checked are appropriate, without reference to other editors. Johnuniq (talk) 10:31, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for helping out! -Reconsider! 09:41, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Latvian Human Rights Committee logo.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Racism in Latvia is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Racism in Latvia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --Martin (talk) 03:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this is just to let you know that I have granted you the "autopatrolled" permission. This won't affect your editing, it just automatically marks any page you create as patrolled, benefiting new page patrollers. Please remember:

• This permission does not give you any special status or authority
• Submission of inappropriate material may lead to its removal
• You may wish to display the {{Autopatrolled}} top icon and/or the {{User wikipedia/autopatrolled}} userbox on your user page
• If, for any reason, you decide you do not want the permission, let me know and I can remove it

If you have any questions about the permission, don't hesitate to ask. Otherwise, happy editing! Acalamari 11:17, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]