User talk:EricthePinko

Hello Angrybeerman. I see that your first edits here have fallen foul of what some would call a political campaign to get rid of British Isles from Wikipedia. User:Snowded has an interest in the British Isles issue and it's no surprise that he's spotted your article. I think within the context of your original use British Isles is in fact acceptable. Mister Flash (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your conspiracy theory. Some of us are very happy for BI to be used where it is cited or is a sensible summary. In this case the reference did not support either. --Snowded ^TALK 17:41, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Look that was clearly a mistake on the church's part. I wasn't try to make a political issue out of this.Angrybeerman (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Angrybeerman, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --Cailil ^talk 00:44, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		Thank you for your message. It's good to be notice for something nice.--ARTEST4ECHO talk 14:34, 1 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It's also interesting to read about Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints and the Kingdom of God. I had not seen this information before. Keep up the good work.--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 13:51, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

--ARTEST4ECHO ^talk 14:41, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Angrybeerman. I noticed on your article, Williamsburg Alewerks almost all of there references are to their site. You need to find some other ones. Thanks, and if you need any help, contact me! If you have questions to this, or comments, feel free to reply to this, I'll be checking back! Endofskull (talk)

Hi! I'm working on it. Just give me a little time. Thanks! Angrybeerman (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds great. I bet it'll turn out good! And thanks for your contributions! Endofskull (talk) 22:31, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! I may not get it done tonight though. Angrybeerman (talk) 22:35, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's quite alright. I'm gonna go ahead and tag it as under construction. That okay? Endofskull (talk) 22:42, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks and goodnight! Angrybeerman (talk) 22:43, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Oh yeah, would you like me to help in any way? Endofskull (talk) 22:44, 23 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note. I'll look over your additions to the article when I get a chance. My impression is that a few of the sources (such as "devilhunters") don't meet WP:RS and I question the BBC pages which are "edited by users", however I appreciate your willingness to cooperatively improve the article. Cheers - LuckyLouie (talk) 13:23, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there, sorry to say that I had to revert your edit on DYK, you have to create your own subpage. You should see: Template talk:Did you know#How to list a new nomination. Cheers. Atomician (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I'm working on it now. Angrybeerman (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted again, you need to create your own subpage at Template talk:Did you know/Article name. If you need some help, I could nominate it for you? Atomician (talk) 17:43, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Right, I think I've got it this time! Angrybeerman (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On 21 August 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of the Meander, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that after the Battle of the Meander, a rumour spread amongst the crusaders that their successful counterattack had been led by an unknown white-clad knight? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Battle of the Meander.You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Thanks from me and the wiki Victuallers (talk) 16:03, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Huzzah! Angrybeerman (talk) 18:41, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, my bad, thought I was reverting the vandalism on the messiah claimants list, rather than reverting it back into place. Thanks. SnowFire (talk) 23:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. I just decided to delete the whole thing because, although I'm no expert on Jay Z, I don't think that he is seriously claiming to be the Messiah! Angrybeerman (talk) 23:57, 9 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Scarborough Fair (ballad), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pentangle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No one ever leaves comments to discuss the articles I've written. Le sigh.EricthePinko (talk) 21:04, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Irish Christian Front, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Neutrality. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:44, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Leeds Revolutionary Feminist Group, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chapeltown. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Your submission of Dolly's Brae conflict at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm ImprovedWikiImprovment. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, List of 2018 FIFA World Cup controversies, but you didn't provide a reliable source (you didn't properly cite}. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. IWI (chat) 13:14, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of 2018 FIFA World Cup controversies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Akira Nishino (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "Proletarian" (journal). Since you had some involvement with the "Proletarian" (journal) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 20:07, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alliance Party of Northern Ireland, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unionism (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your recent edits, including creating Housing Rights & Reform Alliance. But to avoid creating orphan pages, you should remember to link it from other pages. I made the mistake of creating a duplicate page at Housing Rights and Reform Alliance, which I should of course have checked by search if a similar page existed, but I would also have seen it if you'd linked it. Thanks again for your contributions. --Iveagh Gardens (talk) 08:22, 1 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for creating Party for Animal Welfare (Ireland).

User:Doomsdayer520 while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

Thank you for your new article on the Party for Animal Welfare (Ireland). Note that other editors have questioned whether this organization is notable enough for its own Wikipedia article. For pointers, follow the links in the notice at the top of the page. If these concerns are not addressed, future editors could call for the article to be deleted.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 13:35, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Party for Animal Welfare (Ireland) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Party for Animal Welfare (Ireland) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Guliolopez (talk) 18:29, 15 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Housing Rights and Reform Alliance is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Housing Rights and Reform Alliance until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:54, 4 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited European Union–Mercosur Free Trade Agreement, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 28 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, EricthePinko. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Party for Animal Welfare".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 18:18, 29 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Chad (slang), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please open a discussion; you were reverted, the time is now to talk. Further disruption may result in you being blocked. Jorm (talk) 21:35, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Jorm (talk) 21:36, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi EricthePinko,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 08:41, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Czar, looking forward to working with you! EricthePinko (talk) 17:42, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]