User talk:DoctorWhoFan91

DoctorWhoFan91 is taking a semi-wikibreak and will fully return to Wikipedia later.

Hello, DoctorWhoFan91, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• How to avoid a conflict of interest

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! amlz (talk) 01:55, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there , I noticed you replaced the source for AI figures on the series 13 page with one from DWM. I don't have a copy of this, so do you know if it happens to include the figures for the 2022 specials as well? If so, could you verify and update them there as well? TheDoctorWho (talk) 02:56, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't, and neither does the next year's ones. Will have to go looking for where we can find it. I'll do it later, there are a lot of DWM issues to sift through for 2 small words in 80-100 pages each. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 07:15, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'll definitely keep looking for online sources myself as well. Thanks so much for checking! TheDoctorWho (talk) 07:37, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Space-Time Telegraph Volume II, Issue II — September 2024 Brought to you by the editors of WikiProject Doctor Who You like Doctor Who? What's his name then? Welcome Hello and welcome to the second issue of the new newsletter! Following the success of the first newsletter we are back to write more stuff. Articles for deletion Several articles have been nominated for deletion, such as Time War (Doctor Who), and several articles have been deleted, or merged or redirected, especially those relating to books, due to lack of WP:SIGCOV and WP:NBOOK. Editors can always help either by participating in the deletion discussions (which are noted on the project page), adding to such articles, or bringing attention to other such articles through AfD or the WikiProject talk page, to aid in clean-up. Notice of Draft Articles A new Doctor Who spin-off was announced at the 2024 San Diego Comic-Con, called The War Between the Land and the Sea, and will feature old and new Whoniverse characters working for UNIT as they battle the Sea Devils. The main space article currently redirects to Whoniverse, but collaboration is currently underway in a draft article. As filming on this miniseries has recently begun, its relocation to the mains space will presumably take place soon per the recommendations laid out at WP:NTV. There is also a draft article in progress for the upcoming 2024 Christmas special. While this article won't be moved until the episode airs, any new contributions are welcome. Doctor Who News A small number of editors have recently raised questions regarding the reliability of Doctor Who News. This website is particularly used for information regarding viewing figures and the Appreciation Index of most episodes as well as some news information. If there is a better source for any information supported by this website, it should be replaced in good faith. A full consensus on whether or not to remove the information that can't be supported by a different source has not yet been reached. Any editor who has opinions on this matter should contribute to the discussion on the WikiProject talk page. Continued Progress Towards Good/Featured Content There has been lots of progress made towards recognized articles in the last two months, related to such diverse categories as series, specials, lists and episodes A sub-page has also been added to the WikiProject, to list any possible goals we can aim towards. Proposals Regarding the State of Fictional Elements Articles in the WikiProject Several proposals have been laid out regarding fictional elements in the WikiProject, which includes fictional characters, locations, and more. Due to a concerning quality state regarding the large majority of them, several methods of tackling them in order to improve these articles' quality for the future have been proposed. The primary three proposals are as follows: 1. A priority list should be made to determine what articles are most pressing and in need of improvement in the WikiProject overall. Focus would be put onto important subjects and articles in a state of dubious notability that would make them viable for deletion processes such as AfD. 2. A group of articles is selected for improvement, which are ones deemed most relevant to the WikiProject for the future. Any lesser important subjects can be sidelined and worked on as editors see fit. 3. A long term goal is made to improve all elements. This will come at the caveat of taking significantly longer and requiring more heavy participation than the above two proposals, but would guarantee a slow and steady way to solve the issue. If any editors are interested in chiming into the conversation and sharing their piece on how this should be handled, or if any editors wish to help with this proposal and improve fictional elements articles, then feel free to share thoughts at the discussion's section on the article's talk page. Contributors TheDoctorWho (talk) Pokelego999 (talk) Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) "I'm not appalled by it" - The New New York Times If you wish to contribute to future editions of the newsletter or have any feedback, leave a message on the WikiProject talk page or reach out to one of the current contributors listed above. If you do not wish to receive future editions of the Space-Time Telegraph, please remove your name from our our mailing list.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:41, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Doctor Who § Disruptive editing on The Doctor and The Fugitive Doctor. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 02:52, 5 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

My first GAN was originally picked up by someone way too inexperienced to properly review it, and so I must admit that I was skeptical when you chose to review my second GAN, given your newcomer status. It's safe to say you defied my expectations, conducting (what I thought was) a very clear and rigorous review. Thanks for your help, and keep up the good work! Giraffer (talk) 20:28, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the message and the barnstar! I have grown better with each GAN review I have done, and yours was an easy one- the article was concise, easy to read and focused; and your response to the review was great too. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 09:58, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Doctor Who series 2 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 13:42, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forest of the Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 20:24, 12 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Silence in the Library you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 23:05, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silence in the Library you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Silence in the Library and Talk:Silence in the Library/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 18:43, 14 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Silence in the Library you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Silence in the Library for comments about the article, and Talk:Silence in the Library/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:04, 16 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Doctor Who series 2 you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Doctor Who series 2 for comments about the article, and Talk:Doctor Who series 2/GA4 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Reconrabbit -- Reconrabbit (talk) 15:05, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Christmas Invasion you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 06:43, 22 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Christmas Invasion you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Christmas Invasion and Talk:The Christmas Invasion/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 10:41, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Christmas Invasion you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Christmas Invasion for comments about the article, and Talk:The Christmas Invasion/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of ClaudineChionh -- ClaudineChionh (talk) 06:02, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Original Barnstar

Wish we had a unique barnstar at WP:DOCTORWHO, but whatever the case, I figured I'd send this your way. You've joined this Project only recently, and yet you've very much shown a commitment to quality and improvement, and you have several Good Articles already. Congratulations on your accomplishments thus far, and keep up the excellent work. Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 20:53, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with @Pokelego999, well done! And thanks for taking my copyediting critiques so graciously. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email) 07:48, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for having patience during the GAN, I'll make sure to check the articles better before making a GAN. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 11:54, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Forest of the Dead you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Forest of the Dead for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of DaniloDaysOfOurLives -- DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 06:41, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Forest of the Dead you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Pokelego999 -- Pokelego999 (talk) 13:23, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		For your high qaulity GANR throughout the past month and for taking on the challenge of reviewing two medical articles. I applaud your ability to branch out as it personally took me over a year to branch out. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:00, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar! It's even more fitting coming from you, the quantity and quality of your GANRs is partially what drove me to review so many. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:07, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm glad my overly competitive nature has some benifets. I hope you stick around with GANR as you seem to have a knack for it (is that how you spell knack?). IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:08, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It is how you spell knack, though not how you spell benfits or barnstar^[Joke]. I hope you stick around with GANR too. I will too, but probably after a break from GANRs for a month or two. Hope to see more of your GANs the next time I decide to start a GANR. DoctorWhoFan91 (talk) 20:18, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Grammarly doesn't work in the visual editor for replying on talk pages hence the typos. I have always been a terrible speller. I too need a bit of a break from GANR and GAN but hope to see you around. IntentionallyDense (talk) 20:20, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

		The Multiple Good Article Reviewer's Barnstar
		Your noteworthy contribution (34 points total) helped reduce the backlog by more than 250 articles! Here's a token of our appreciation. Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 19:27, 3 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]