User talk:Billy Liakopoulos

Welcome!

Hello, Billy Liakopoulos, and welcome to Wikipedia! I have noticed that you are fairly new! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. I also see that some of your recent edits show an interest in the use of images and/or photos on Wikipedia.

Did you know that ...

• ...Wikipedia has a very stringent image use policy?
• ...most images from Flickr, online news websites, and other web sources are copyrighted?
• ...Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously?
• ...freely-licensed images should be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, a central location for images where they can be used on all Wikipedia projects?
• ...we recommend that new users use our "files for upload" process - at least until you get the hang of things?

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archives

Archive 1

Thanks for uploading File:9Now logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:24, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Hi. In the table for the Seven Network, why are you frequently changing the name "Untitled New Channel" to "Untitled Seven's fifth digital Channel"? The original title was placed there as the channel is currently untitled and because it is listed as "New Channel" on any EPG. Adding in the "Seven's fifth digital Channel" part is unnecessary as readers can already see from the table that it is Seven's fifth digital channel and the extra text in that cell distorts the size of the cell to an unnecessarily large size for a channel that has not even begun broadcasting. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 02:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Hi. Thank you for adding the information about ABC HD's relaunch to the channel's article. However, as a heads-up, next time you add in details about a channel launch or relaunch to an article, can you please include a credible source to support your edit? I was about to remove your uncredited information until I did a quick search myself and found a credible source which I have added to the article. Thanks again for your edit. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 06:57, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:14, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article PLUS7 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PLUS7 (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 05:28, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of programs broadcast by Network Ten, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Uptight and Dangermouse. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TENplay logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Hi. Thank you for expanding the information that I added about Ten HD's revival to other articles. However, next time you do this, please include the sources cited on the original article to support the new information? I notified you about this in December 2015, so I'm just reminding you again to make sure. I have corrected these errors.

Also, until an official statement is released by Network Ten stating otherwise, Ten HD's destination channel should be kept as channel 1 due to the fact that channel 1 is the channel that Ten makes their HD broadcasts, and all other revived HD channels have been returned to their original channel number.

– Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 06:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Hi. I noticed that you reverted my edits to Template:ABC Television that were made to bring the template in line with the format of other similar television templates (e.g. Template:Nine Entertainment). I wish to discuss the situation with you and see your reasoning for your edit. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 07:59, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Hi. After thorough and lengthy research, I made detailed and time consuming edits to Network Ten, Ten HD, One and Eleven that corrected the channel name stylisations to all-caps. This is supported by all of Ten Network Holdings' annual reports (e.g. 2015, 2011 and 2006) and other official media (e.g. [1], [2], and [3]). My case is well supported, and I clearly noted this in my edit summaries, however, you reverted my edits without contacting me asking me about my reasoning. I would like to discuss this matter with you and come to an understanding. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 05:19, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: Please come here to discuss the issue first before you revert my edits like you have just done at Network Ten. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 09:12, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Billy Liakopoulos: This discussion has been moved to Talk:Network Ten#Stylising Network TEN for a public discussion. Please make any further comments there. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 09:27, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7flix, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Quantico. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've just reverted a few of your resent edits, eg [4][5]. Please have a look at WP:SUBCAT, in particular:

a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category"

Please consider reverting your recent edits where you added a parent of an existing category. Thanks, Mitch Ames (talk) 11:26, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re [6] and similar - again I ask that you please read WP:SUBCAT.

Category:National Basketball League (Australia) venues is a subcategory of Category:Basketball venues in Australia, Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre (and others) is in Category:National Basketball League (Australia) venues, therefore it ought not also be directly in Category:Basketball venues in Australia, because according to WP:SUBCAT

a page or category should rarely be placed in both a category and a subcategory or parent category (supercategory) of that category

If you think that Category:National Basketball League (Australia) venues ought not be a subcategory of Category:Basketball venues in Australia, then please remove it.

If you think that one of these categories should be a {{Non-diffusing subcategory}} or {{All included}}, as described in WP:DUPCAT, then please say so, and/or update the categories according.

If you think there is some reason why WP:SUBCAT should not apply to these articles, please say so explicitly, so that we can discuss why.

If you don't understand my objection, please say so, so that I can try to explain better.

In any case edit-warring is not the answer.

Thank-you, Mitch Ames (talk) 03:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Similarly Kingborough Sports Centre (and others) that are in Category:Defunct National Basketball League (Australia) venues ought not also be directly in Category:Basketball venues in Australia, because they are already in it indirectly - Kingborough Sports Centre is in Category:Defunct National Basketball League (Australia) venues, which is in Category:National Basketball League (Australia) venues, which is in Category:Basketball venues in Australia. Hence my reversions [7] etc. If you still disagree, please discuss the matter. Mitch Ames (talk) 11:27, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2014–15 NBL season by team. Since you had some involvement with the 2014–15 NBL season by team redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBN TV 1979 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBN TV 1994-2006 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBN TV 2006-2008 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:47, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBN TV 2008-09 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:21, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of international television series premieres on Australian television in 2008, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jibber Jabber. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:11, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Billy. Thank you for your edits to Australian TV articles in the wake of the 2016 media shakeup. However, there is one critical detail that you have overlooked, by performing a cut and paste page move from Southern Cross Ten to Southern Cross Nine, you have damaged the page edit history of the original article. All that you needed to do was request a page move at WP:RMT, which I have done. Please try to avoid repeating this mistake in future. If you are unable to move a page in future, please go to the appropriate forum to request an administrator perform the move instead. Regards. – Nick Mitchell 98 ^talk 14:46, 30 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:60 Minutes Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:23, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ANT1 HD logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:9NBN logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 22 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Eleven (Australian TV channel), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sleepy Hollow. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:00, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Footy Show (AFL) Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've reverted your edit which reverted my edit to Template:Free-to-air television channels in Australia. Firstly, there were duplicate links in the template which are discouraged, and secondly the corporations listed didn't seem relevant to me to be listed, and made the template much larger than it otherwise needed to be, and was overlinked. -- Whats new?^(talk) 10:16, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Whats new?. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Olympics on Australian television, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Whats new?^(talk) 09:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Magna Home Entertainment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inspector Gadget. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article In Rio Today is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/In Rio Today until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ethanlu121 (talk) 20:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Beyond Home Entertainment is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Beyond Home Entertainment until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- Whats new?^(talk) 02:29, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:The Farmer Wants a Wife Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:04, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 7TWO, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Six Feet Under. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ken Sparkes.
  You have been editing here long enough to know that we DON'T do edits like THIS, declaring a person is dead, without a source. 220 of ^Borg 08:55, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summary request

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! - 220 of ^Borg 09:07, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've noticed you have created several articles in recent times, that are little more than an infobox and one sentence without a single references. As you've been told before judging by your talk page here, everything on Wikipedia must be referenced. Please don't create articles without sources, or your articles will keep being nominated for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 00:12, 13 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I note that you are still adding content without references on various articles. If you are having difficulty with sourcing, please read Wikipedia:REFB which explains referencing for beginners. -- Whats new?^(talk) 01:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited NITV News Bulletin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page SBS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

• WP:COMMUNICATE is an essay that you might want to read. Refusing to communicate when there is serious and legitimate concern about your editing can and eventually will lead to sanction. Dennis Brown - 2¢ 22:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as you've not addressed the above concerns, I'm afraid I've had to disable your editing privileges until we get a reponse. You can still edit this talk page, and once we can establish communication, we can unblock. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 07:54, 25 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please I really want to edit all page of article update please unblock my user account if you please I like being a Wikipedia account I done this for 5 years. 03.10, 26 September 2016 (AEST)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Billy Liakopoulos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #16595 was submitted on Sep 26, 2016 05:32:39. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:32, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)}, Please I really want to edit all article please unblock my user account if you please I like being a Wikipedia account I done this for 5 years so I will never do that thing again of living persons. 15.28, 28 September 2016 (AEST)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Billy Liakopoulos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been blocked because I accidently put out living person so I will never do that again, below link is the proof that my account was accessed elsewhere.

Decline reason:

We have had a number of strange requests exactly like this with "link is the proof that my account was accessed elsewhere" claims and a link to https://samplewikihow - would you please explain? Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 07:12, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

https://samplewikihow link.com

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Billy Liakopoulos (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

My account has been blocked because I accidently put out living person so I will never do that again.

Decline reason:

I don't understand your unblock request. It doesn't clearly demonstrate a clear indication that you understand why you were blocked. Another admin, Boing! said Zebedee, asked you a question about why your previous unblock request looks very similar to other unblock requests, for instance one found at User talk:Kosi Onochie. I too am curious. Please explain below, but please do not open another unblock request. I have your talk page watchlisted, so I can reply to any further comments you have.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:7HD 2016 logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billy Liakopoulos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article Everyday Health (Australian TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced and unremarkable TV show.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Robert McClenon (talk) 03:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The article MVP (Australian TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, two sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:17, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Behind the Front Door has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

One sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:32, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Between the Lines (Australian TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, two sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:38, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Final Siren has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, one sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:44, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article One Week at a Time (NRL) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, one sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:54, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Simply Footy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, two sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 04:58, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Wakkaville has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, one sentence article about a non-notable television program. WP:DEL7 and WP:DEL8. Article was created by a user now banned.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 05:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article Eddie McGuire Tonight has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable television show. Undeveloped article without references. Created by a now-banned user

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Whats new?^(talk) 06:07, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Good Game has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Rob Sinden (talk) 16:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Attica TV to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. ResultingConstant (talk) 02:56, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIN Television 2016 logo.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  03:28, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WIN Television 2016 logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ViperSnake151  Talk  15:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Network Ten programming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Binksternet (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nine Network programming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Binksternet (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SBS Television programming has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Binksternet (talk) 17:59, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIN HD logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:15, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIN HD 2016 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:16, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIN HD logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WIN HD 2016 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adelaide Lightning roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canberra Capitals roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dandenong Rangers roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:28, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Sports broadcasting contracts in Indian subcontinent requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Darius robin (talk) 10:20, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2013 in Australian television has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBLPlayoffBracket2010 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBLPlayoffBracket1980 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 17:32, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:SBS 2 2015 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Sydney Kings Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Brisbane Bullets logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:E TV logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian comedy TV series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian reality TV shows has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. --woodensuperman 14:11, 12 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The article Fear Factor (Australian game show) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This article has no sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  » Shadowowl | talk 19:06, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:NBL Logo 2015.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ABC ME logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:35, 24 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nine2006 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian children's television series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Allied45 (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Australian sports TV series has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Allied45 (talk) 03:41, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Kids TV Programs Australia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Allied45 (talk) 03:42, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:TENplay logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:41, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nine Entertainment Co.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:58, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:North Shore Events Centre home court.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 00:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Studio 10 Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 7 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Adelaide Lightning roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 21:49, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Boomers logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 2 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:ABC iview 2014 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:WNBL-logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Ten 1989-91 logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:Star Channel 2014 logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The article Koinonia Ora Mega has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced article that fails to credibly assert notability of the subject

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AussieLegend (✉) 15:31, 13 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Sports Australia. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 June 15#Sports Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. ItsPugle (talk) 11:30, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Nunawading Spectres logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Toasted TV Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:47, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for uploading File:PLUS7 Logo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The article From Six to Ten has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 10:42, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Australian Broadcasting Corporation specials has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:59, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The article Animation Salvation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent notability, fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 08:36, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sydney Uni Flames roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:34, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canberra Capitals roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Dandenong Rangers roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:14, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Melbourne Boomers roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:15, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Townsville Fire roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 06:16, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Spree TV 2015 logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The file File:SBS on Demand logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:SBS On Demand logo.svg

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 11:07, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect New Channel Ten morning program and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 January 18 § New Channel Ten morning program until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. From Bassie f (his talk page) 05:57, 18 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article The Pits (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:BEFORE search returns no information, article gives no indication of notability and has apparently never been updated.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HumanBodyPiloter5 (talk) 16:43, 10 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Alter Channel original programming indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:26, 3 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on One Week at a Time requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Regards, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 05:53, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article From Six to Ten is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/From Six to Ten until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 20:20, 12 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9Gem logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 09:17, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9Now logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 22:14, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:9Go! logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 06:39, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prime TV 1988-1991 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:26, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Prime TV 1991-2001 logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 4 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bendigo Spirit current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billy Liakopoulos

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Actualcpscm, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Fox Kids (Australia), for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 13:53, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Billy Liakopoulos, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Actualcpscm, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Fox Kids (Australia), should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fox Kids (Australia).

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Actualcpscm}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Actualcpscm ^{scrutinize, talk} 08:18, 15 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Hot Streak has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG, tagged for notability since 2015

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 03:19, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Head First (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2014

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 15:20, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Nine News Now has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Apart from the white jacket-gate incident, the subject almost completely fails WP:NTV and WP:GNG, with the only reliable references not related to the controversy, most of the references are from TV Tonight, with Mumbrella, 9Honey, B&T, The Age, and The Daily Telegraph, with just 1 reference each on this subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 06:52, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Aspire TV (Australian TV channel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. I have only added 6 references to this article, so far, and I did not find any other references. Tagged for additional citations since February 2023.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 02:54, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Shoot Out (TV series) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:23, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Category:ABC News (Australia) presenters has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --woodensuperman 11:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article ABC News at Noon has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for no sources since January 2015, despite being a news program that airs every weekday at noon.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Yours sincerely, TechGeek105 (his talk page) 04:49, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SEQ Stars current roster has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:50, 9 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports broadcasting contracts in Greece is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Serbia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 21:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sports broadcasting contracts in Greece is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sports broadcasting contracts in Greece until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SpacedFarmer (talk) 08:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Pat Callinan's 4x4 Adventures has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:10, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panta n' antamonoume is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Panta n' antamonoume (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

DonaldD23 talk to me 11:26, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article Tour the World has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article lacks notability. No WP:SIGCOV in reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JoeNMLC (talk) 19:06, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NBL season has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:46, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]