User talk:Alandmanson

Hello, Alandmanson, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Shirt58 (talk) 13:16, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Thanks for creating Agriocnemis falcifera, Alandmanson!

Wikipedia editor FoCuSandLeArN just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

good job on the Agriocnemis falcifera article!

To reply, leave a comment on FoCuSandLeArN's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Just to let you know: your contributions are highly appreciated! I work on butterflies and moths myself, but are glad someone is picking up writing about other African Insects. Keep it up! Ruigeroeland (talk) 14:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Africallagma sapphirinum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dorsal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitisols, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 15 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Alandmanson/draft article on SOM, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Soil organic matter. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:23, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Alandmanson/notes on humus, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Humus. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 13:36, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Alandmanson/notes on humus. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Humus. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Humus – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. —Largo Plazo (talk) 16:49, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've moved both the drafts you created to your own user space, with the User: prefix. They're at:

• User:Alandmanson/notes on humus
• User:Alandmanson/draft article on SOM

—Largo Plazo (talk) 17:01, 27 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

	Thanks much
	Thanks much for the excellent edits to the Soil article. I've been working on it for a long time and find it is very useful to have another pair of eyes reading it critically. Zedshort (talk) 20:04, 17 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Agree! -- Paleorthid (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nitrification, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aerobic. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 22 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Phyllomacromia contumax, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.igoterra.com/artspec.asp?thingid=89816.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 10:19, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The igoterra page is a mirror of the wikipedia page. Alandmanson (talk) 10:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trithemis arteriosa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Congo. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Improving article content related to SOC and SOM is an area of interest for me. This is an area of understanding that is going through a massive paradigm shift as researchers work to validate assumptions on humification. I don't believe this scientific revolution of new ideas in SOM is widely recognized. I appreciate your recent edit summed as "humus is not always highly stable". Perhaps this is indicative that you are aware of these new ideas such as blogged about yesterday at http://www.gardenmyths.com/humus-does-not-exist-says-new-study/, commenting on the conclusion that humification does not involve the stepped reduction in molecular size to increasingly resistant/persistent forms of carbon that we thought it did. I follow the work of these the two authors, Lehmann and Kleber, of the Nature article, can vouch for them as world class scientists working on important questions. Lehmann was a co-author on Mao 2012 which really dug deep into the charcoal derived fraction of SOC.

Mao, J.-D.; Johnson, R. L.; Lehmann, J.; Olk, J.; Neeves, E. G.; Thompson, M. L.; Schmidt-Rohr, K. (2012). "Abundant and stable char residues in soils: implications for soil fertility and carbon sequestration". Environmental Science and Technology. 46: 9571–9576. doi:10.1021/es301107c.

Mao 2012 resonates with the 2001 statement by a Canadian research team: a considerable change in conceptual understanding (a paradigm shift) appears imminent

Ponomarenko, E.V.; Anderson, D.W. (2001), "Importance of charred organic matter in Black Chernozem soils of Saskatchewan", Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 81 (3): 285–297, The present paradigm views humus as a system of heteropolycondensates, largely produced by the soil microflora, in varying associations with clay (Anderson 1979). Because this conceptual model, and simulation models rooted within the concept, do not accommodate a large char component, a considerable change in conceptual understanding (a paradigm shift) appears imminent.

I look forward to your article improvements! -- Paleorthid (talk) 17:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Alandmanson/draft article on Fertilizer, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Alandmanson/draft article on Fertilizer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Alandmanson/draft article on Fertilizer during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've done excellent work on plant nutrition. I meant to get back to that article but I am easily distracted by shinny objects and loud noises. Zedshort (talk) 17:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

careful on four-coloured/gorgeous bushshrike. not agreement on split......keep as four-coloured with gorgeous as a subspecies......Pvmoutside (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alandmanson, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the "autopatrolled" permission to your account, as you have created numerous, valid articles. This feature will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 14:30, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please can you have a look at the last Calandrella link in {{Larks Birdlife-HBW August2017}}? It's pointing to a disambiguation page. I guess it should be Mongolian short-toed lark Calandrella dukhunensis but it's not my subject area, so I'd rather someone more knowledgeable fixed it please. Thanks, Certes (talk) 16:30, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thanks for the catch! You are correct, it is dukhunensis. Alandmanson (talk) 16:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page http://dx.doi.org/10.2989/10220110109485760. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed.

Also, it appears that you copied or moved text from Weenen to Weenen Game Reserve. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. I have added the required attribution. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:31, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nutrient management, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Anaerobic and Leaching (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:19, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mecynorhina passerinii, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page DRC (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:49, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

I am a regular contributor of the birds by location section, an 'atlas project' in which users can literally browse bird species according to their geographical presence worldwide (retrievable from the BirdLife International website) via relevant sub-categories, many of which correspond to environmental (e.g. "birds of the miombo") as well as political (e.g. "birds of Southern Africa") geographical regions.
e.g. the Birds of South America cat. previously included a random and incomplete list of bird entries, but has since been ammended and improved, whereby now : birds with a pan-range of presence are listed on the home page, while many birds' ranges of presence tend to correspond to an environmental geographical region, to which they are particularly confined to ; e.g birds of the Northern Andes etc.
All in all, the project now allows for a clearer, well-structured and fathomable browsing of birds according to their geographical presence...

I am currently implicated in a debate against several other contributors who claim that such refined environmental sub-regional categories are needless and should be removed and merged into their political parent categories (e.g. whereby birds typically present throughout the miombo region would be upmerged into the vaguer and broader, less relevant "birds of Souther Africa" category): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2018_February_3#Category:Birds_of_the_Miombo. Despite my clarifications and counter-arguments, I seem unable to convince them otherwise.

Should you wish to express your viewpoint, please do not hesitate to leave a comment on the talk page, preceded by the word keep or merge. Regards --Couiros22 (talk) 11:25, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Alan. Warwick Tarboton seems to have authenticated this specimen from South Africa, yet it is not listed in my copy of his book The Dragonflies of South Africa. Can you explain this please as you reference the book on the page List of Odonata species of South Africa. Perhaps I've got an old edition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:53, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Yip, see https://www.warwicktarboton.co.za/Dragonfly%20Book.html for the 2015 book - I see that an ebook is now available. We have seen huge advances in SA dragons over the past 15 years! Alandmanson (talk) 13:52, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• See also: http://addo.adu.org.za/index.php?taxon_id=80600 Alandmanson (talk) 15:01, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just came from the FB post on the Hymenopterists' group, wonder if you were at Wikimania in Cape Town about a year back. I was there and also managed to find some time out to meet Les Underhill with whom I see you have worked! Shyamal (talk) 06:05, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi - Nope, I was not at Wikimania (I live at the other end of the country), but happy that you could visit and meet guys like Les - Cape Town, its people and the Cape mountains have a special place in my heart! --Alandmanson (talk) 07:48, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

HI,

I am giving a presentation over Zn usage in plants and I would like permission to use your picture of maize with a zinc deficiency for my slides. It is a lovely picture. My email address is wildersl@missouri.edu.

Thanks you,

Stacy Wilder 67.6.37.94 (talk) 17:20, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Hi Stacy - Yes, please feel free to use any of my images on Wikipedia.Alandmanson (talk) 06:03, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:24, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cleonymidae, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 19:45, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The article Gorgeous bushshrike (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Disambiguation is not required: both entries point to the same article

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:09, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Calesidae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marginal vein. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 20:20, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mesosoma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gaster.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:51, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]