User talk:Akalanka820

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 5 sections are present.

Why are you being so strict on not including the term

Greetings, I noticed you keep editing the article Rajputisation by not allowing the inclusion of the Rajputisation of Badgujars only because the author doesn't use the term "Rajputisation". You do understand that by his research, he is implying that the Badgujars were originally Gurjars who mixed with the Hephthalites to become a Rajput group.

Read this: ^[1] In its survey of The People of India, the Anthropological Survey of India (AnSI) – a government-sponsored organisation – noted that:

The Gurjars/Gujjars were no doubt a remarkable people spread from Kashmir to Gujarat and Maharashtra, who gave an identity to Gujarat, established kingdoms, entered the Rajput groups as the dominant lineage of Badgujar, and survive today as a pastoral and a tribal group with both Hindu and Muslim segments.^[2]

It seems as if you are being more emotionally offended, rather than trying to include a valid piece of information related to the subject. And No2WesternImperialism (talk) 07:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

please read WP:RSCASTE, K S Suresh Singh is not used on Wikipedia, read Sitush sources for it, and also read WP:NPA, using emotionally offended is personal attack. Also do read what is WP:ONUS and what is WP:SYNTH. Engage with me on your talk page here - [[1]], not on multiple pages.

Akalanka820 (talk) 08:05, 17 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

–Novem Linguae (talk) 12:41, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Mail registration

hello akalanka,,,, i seen that you have not updeted mail id in your account,,, please add a mail id in your prefarances so that we can have some privete talking. BombHunter (talk) 18:23, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Ghrit

you have defamed the entire ghrit community through your page. Neither you have the knowledge nor expertise to write such thing's. Publishing views of someone who may or may not have a special views about a certain community is not acceptable without asking them.The source taken from some British according to whome the entire nation filthy and low cast is not acceptable. Please either correct it or make the page open and write an apology to the entire community . We know who we are better then anyone else . Such hateful language will not be tolerated by any means. 2409:40D7:7:38B9:8000:0:0:0 (talk) 15:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

^ Kurbanov, Aydogdy (2010). "The Hephthalites: Archaeological and Historical Analysis" (PDF). p. 243. Retrieved 11 January 2013. As a result of the merging of the Hephthalites and the Gujars with population from northwestern India, the Rajputs (from Sanskrit "rajputra" – "son of the rajah") formed.
^ Kumar Suresh Singh; B. V. Bhanu; Anthropological Survey of India (2004). People of India: Maharashtra. Popular Prakashan. p. xxviii. ISBN 978-81-7991-101-3.

[1] Kurbanov, Aydogdy (2010). "The Hephthalites: Archaeological and Historical Analysis" (PDF). p. 243. Retrieved 11 January 2013. As a result of the merging of the Hephthalites and the Gujars with population from northwestern India, the Rajputs (from Sanskrit "rajputra" – "son of the rajah") formed.

[B._V._Bhanu_2004-2] Kumar Suresh Singh; B. V. Bhanu; Anthropological Survey of India (2004). People of India: Maharashtra. Popular Prakashan. p. xxviii. ISBN 978-81-7991-101-3.

[1]