User talk:00101984hjw

Hello, 00101984hjw!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

• Editing
• Referencing
• Images
• Tables
• Policies and guidelines
• Talk pages
• Navigating
• Manual of Style

---

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

---

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

• Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
• It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
• If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
• Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
• When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
• If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
• Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Hajoon0102 💬 04:29, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:LeeEHwa.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Petition to the Blue House, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jobs. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Adakiko. I noticed that in this edit to National Petition to the Blue House, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 01:49, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I undid this edit and wanted to share rationale.

It's a little tricky; I arrived at this formatting intentionally after a long time of thinking. Part of the problem is we don't know how authors romanize their own names, and rather than searching for that info or assuming a romanization that they don't prefer, I think leaving their Hangul names as is is safer and quicker. Furthermore, I think the parameters should correspond to the literal names. In other words, 김현정's given name is not "Hyeon-jeong (김현정)", it's just "현정" (or maybe "Hyeon-jeong", we don't know unless we research that person). 104.232.119.107 (talk) 00:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I thought it would generally be helpful to provide a RR romanization of the names of each author per WP:NCKO. Does MOS:KO have any rules for Korean names in reference? 00101984hjw (talk) 01:23, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Complicated; I agree that it's potentially helpful to have Latin text names, as not everyone can type Korean and sometimes people need to reference author surnames, but then we have the |first=Hyeon-jeong (김현정) issue.

There may be an argument to romanize to RR per WP:NCKO, but I'd still prefer to exclude the Korean text if we do that. But again, we'd run into the "what if authors have preferred spellings" problem again. It's so much work to look up every author to see if/how they romanize their names in some way.

Unfortunately MOS:KO doesn't provide guidance on it; honestly it doesn't provide guidance on much.

But this is just my opinion; I think there's positives and negatives to each option.

Key thing is I think we should propose changes to WP:NCKO and MOS:KO, both on this issue and others. Both style guides are too loose and confusing. 104.232.119.107 (talk) 02:35, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. MOS:KO absolutely needs an update. Current guidelines are ambiguous and has little coverage over many potential issues. The current state of the Goguryeo article would be a good example. 00101984hjw (talk) 03:04, 14 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

thank you for your contributions!! :) xRozuRozu (t • c) 20:56, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 6 September 2024, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article 1954 Busan Yongdusan fire, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that 30 royal portraits of Korean kings were completely destroyed in a 1954 fire in Busan, South Korea? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/1954 Busan Yongdusan fire. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, 1954 Busan Yongdusan fire), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:02, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ddotty, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

OhHaiMark (talk) 03:47, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This important article is in really rough shape, if you're interested in an article that needs improving seefooddiet (talk) 17:52, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll take a look at it when I have time. Thanks. — 00101984hjw (talk) 20:08, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]