User talk:Tamtam90

Now I'm blocked almost from every social network; hence, any post "from me" everywhere, but in Wikipedia (from now), wouldn't be mine.

Hello, I'm Flyer22. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to List of unsolved problems in mathematics because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Flyer22 (talk) 02:56, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bratsk, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Luger. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. Widr (talk) 22:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Thank you! --Tamtam90 (talk) 22:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Square-free integer are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. In this case, there's a math reference desk specifically at Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Mathematics Deacon Vorbis (talk) 02:54, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Thank you for your notice. I've added the reference desk page to my watchlist. --Tamtam90 (talk) 00:26, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox folk song has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox musical composition. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:16, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tamtam90. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pozhalostin Museum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Imperial Porcelain Factory. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:49, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why did you revert my edit? It was just spelling and grammar fixes.

• Please, introduce yourself. --Tamtam90 (talk) 21:39, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Your edit looks like a WP:VAND:

1. No need to describe all your "improvements". --Tamtam90 (talk) 21:46, 13 October 2020 (UTC) How is that vandalism? The article was extremely difficult to read due to very weird grammar and word choices, so i fixed them. "Most of such items"? No one talks like this. -Sophia (talk) 01:08, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:24, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello - on my talk page, you said: Good afternoon. Why have you reverted my addition right after the publication, though I provided 3 links to scientific journals?

The sources you added are not WP:MEDRS reviews, and the content is misleading. There are no medicinal properties of apricots or its seed extracts. We do not cite traditional medicine sources because they are pseudoscience and quackery. Please do not edit war, WP:WAR.

Zefr (talk) 18:37, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Zefr, hi here. Sorry for the "delay". There are some official (not traditional) sources which say the opposite, in particular, Japanese, Russian (see the section "Economic importance and application" with its links). --Tamtam90 (talk) 20:39, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there isn't a reliable source in US or European medical literature, then it likely isn't worth trying to make a point about health effects. Think of the practical side of the issue - what would be the economic benefit of grinding up apricot kernels to make a medicine? Zefr (talk) 21:18, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I see you're a member of WP:Anthropology, would you be interested in joining a sub project on oral tradition? Kowal2701 (talk) 13:59, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• IMHO, there's no need in such manoeuvres to turn a "koval" into a "vocal", at least within Wikipedia. --Tamtam90 (talk) 15:02, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Are you saying I’m being too spammy? Kowal2701 (talk) 15:17, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  I have only a bit of time to publish and watch some of my articles (I wished to write). Hopefully, we've understood each other. --Tamtam90 (talk) 15:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  That's okay, I'm not asking you to do anything you don't want to Kowal2701 (talk) 16:06, 27 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you translated text from ru:Wiegenlied to Wiegenlied (Des Knaben Wunderhorn). While you are welcome to translate Wikipedia content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing requires that you provide attribution to the contributor(s) of the original article. When translating from a foreign-language Wikipedia article, this is supplied at a minimum in an edit summary on the page where you add translated content, identifying it as a translation and linking it to the source page. Sample wording for this is given here. If you forgot, or were not aware of this requirement, attribution must be given retroactively, for example:

NOTE: Content in the edit of 01:25, January 25, 2023 was translated from the existing French Wikipedia article at [[:fr:Exact name of French article]]; see its history for attribution.

Retroactive attribution may be added using a dummy edit; see Repairing insufficient attribution. It is good practice, especially if translation is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{translated page}} template on the talk page of the destination article. If you have added translated content previously which was not attributed at the time it was added, you must add attribution retrospectively, even if it was a long time ago. You can read more about author attribution and the reasons for it at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 15:28, 22 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for thy care. Being the maker of the above-mentioned article, I thought that might be a bit "selfish" to show me up in such a manner. --Tamtam90 (talk) 05:43, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No, it won’t be considered selfish :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:14, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]