Talk:Wycombe Wanderers F.C.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buckinghamshire (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire articles England Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Football: England / English non-league Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the English football task force (assessed as Mid-importance). This article is supported by the English non-league task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

British English should be used for articles on Britain related topics. Likewise, American English should be used on articles pertaining to American topics. For a clearer example, please visit this sub-section on the differences between their usage. --Siva1979^{Talk to me} 05:15, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It might be an idea to include a "details correct as of: (date)" above the list of current players, so that a transfer isn't missed. Similar to in this article Beaver Patrol 15:51, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I know there is a dispute as to whether the club was founded in 1884 or 1887. As I understand it, the club claim 1884, but the earliest known reference is 1887. Can we come to a consensus as to which should be used in the article? Drc79 15:58, 5 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The clubs official year is 1884. When someone else commented is not relevant - KC —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.16.254.228 (talk) 12:31, 9 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wycombe Wanderers badge.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:02, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The history section of the article is insanely long. It would probably be worth spinning it off to History of Wycombe Wanderers F.C. and leaving only a summary here, as is the case with most other clubs -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:04, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with this suggestion. The history section takes an age just to scroll through, never mind read, and it makes the page way too long. Christophee (talk) 11:27, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A couple of the average home league attendence in the 'Fans' section have been formatted and ended up looking like Skype numnbers. Could someone fix this? Noble Korhedron 21:22, 12 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Noble Korhedron (talk • contribs)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wycombe Wanderers F.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130330110231/http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/FamilyExcellenceAward/0,,10794~1610090,00.html to http://www.football-league.co.uk/page/FamilyExcellenceAward/0,,10794~1610090,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that for the 2018–19 Wycombe Wanderers F.C. season, the home kit on the infobox has stayed as it has been for the 2016–17 and 2017–18 seasons. However they changed it between seasons^[1] and as much as I want to change it, I have no idea how! Is there anyone out there who knows how to sort this? Joalhe1997 (talk) 19:08, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DipsyDave, as you were the last person who added to the kits for this page, perhaps you can help? Joalhe1997 (talk) 18:56, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]