Talk:Saeed al-Ghamdi

	Saeed al-Ghamdi was one of the Social sciences and society good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 16, 2005 Good article nominee Listed October 5, 2007 Good article reassessment Delisted
Current status: Delisted good article

This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles Saudi Arabia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Saudi Arabia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Saudi Arabia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Saudi ArabiaWikipedia:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaTemplate:WikiProject Saudi ArabiaSaudi Arabia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Crime and Criminal Biography: Terrorism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Terrorism task force (assessed as High-importance). United States: September 11 High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject September 11, 2001 (assessed as High-importance).

Section sizes Section size for Saeed al-Ghamdi (10 sections) Section name Byte count Section total (Top) 2,802 2,802 Early life and education 3,646 3,646 In the United States 2,420 2,420 Attacks 1,601 1,601 Mistaken identity allegations 2,848 2,848 In popular culture 386 386 See also 133 133 Notes 31 31 References 28 28 External links 715 715 Total 14,610 14,610

I'm freakishly newbish and don't trust myself to edit anything properly, but I think someone should mention that Saeed al-Ghamdi was portrayed as a character in the film "United 93." And quite well too, though that's hardly encyclopedic data. ^_^

It’s a debateable point, do we list every time there’s a movie about Hitler (technically we have a separate article "Hitler in Popular Culture" or something, iirc), or when George Washington appears? I think our best bet would be to create a Films about the 9/11 Hijackers article, if you didn’t want to just keep everything to United 93 or The Hamburg Cell, etc.

That said, I went to United 93 with high hopes, but while I found it great that the movie ‘’did’’ focus on the control room situations, NORAD, etc, I found their portrayal of the hijackers disheartening, though that wasn’t specifically ire about Saeed’s portrayal. Though it should be pointed out, that since [the cockpit recorder was released to the public], it seems that Saeed had been the one flying the plane and not Ziad as previously thought. Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 14:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• According to Newsweek, Military records show that the three used as their address 10 Radford Boulevard, a base roadway on which residences for foreign-military flight trainees are located. In March 1997, Saeed Alghamdi listed the address to register a 1998 Oldsmobile; five months later he used it again to register a second vehicle, a late model Buick. 1997?!? That can't be right... Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 07:15, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any chance at a birthdate? Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 13:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Does anyone know the origin of the image of the I-94 form? Can I find it on an official or well known media site?Lenbrazil 01:06, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'll look it up as soon as I get regular net access restored, it's on my home computer in my Wiki folder, so I'd say it's "likely" that it was among the exhibits presented by the 9/11 Commission. But I'll doublecheck when I get a chance Sherurcij ^{(talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject)} 14:26, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think in the debate of which should be the "main" image, we should probably go with the one released by the FBI memorandum and Public Announcement, and released to media centres following the September 11th attacks. A later image that surfaced, and was used as evidence in the trial against Zacarias Moussaoui, is still valid and important to include, but should not be the "main image". In addition, the photograph is 'marred' by an evidence sticker, any chance someone could find the image sans sticker, or could photoshop it off, so we have just the image? Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 15:23, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I question your need to photoshop the historical record. Did you photoshop the other images you uploaded to this article? Do you routinely photoshop history? The evidence tag is part of the historical record.

Why are you pushing the POV of having a youths picture for the biography of an adult? You have not said why his photo as a youth should be the reference standard other than it was the first available. My sense is your setting up this subject to redicule hence the POV, he was obviously a man when he committed the crime.--Paul E. Ester 16:52, 5 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you believe that photograph is him as a youth? He could be just as old as in any other photograph. The "historical record" of what Saeed al-Ghamdi looked like does not include what evidence number he appeared as in an unrelated trial about Zacarias Moussaoui - the actual photograph does not include that sticker, the sticker was placed atop the photograph. It's not different than say, removing the picture frame from a copy of a photograph hanging in the Smithsonian, if the article is about the photo, not its place in the Smithsonian. There is no POV to push, and I'm not ridiculing anything, do you have any evidence otherwise? I'm suggesting we use the FBI-released photograph since there is no apparent reason not to other than the fact Paul Ester thinks he looks too youthful. Sherurcij ^{(Speaker for the Dead)} 00:50, 6 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a consensus here on whether this guy is dead or not? I can't find a retraction by the Telegraph of [this article], but I also don't see any other confirmation that that Saeed al-Ghamdi is A) actually alive and B) the same person as the person named as a hijacker. Either these are two different Saeed al-Ghamdi's, or somebody else was on the plane under al-Ghamdi's name, but I can't seem to find a sourced answer to which one it is. It's all very confusing...

• It was a case of mistaken identity. [1][2]--Sloane 15:20, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of October 5, 2007, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

Ruslik 09:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The reasons:

The article claims a lot without citing any sources. In addition, some refs are dead, while some others are weblinks without information about title, dates, authors etc. I also think that the article has two many images. The wikipedia is not a photogallery of terrorists. So only one or two images should be left. Ruslik 09:54, 5 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:109 saed alghamdi training.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 19:14, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Saeed al-Ghamdi. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

• Attempted to fix sourcing for http://archives.cnn.com/2002/WORLD/meast/09/12/alqaeda.911.claim/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:38, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Saeed al-Ghamdi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100807204647/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:20, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Saeed al-Ghamdi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100809032821/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//911/pdf/sec7.pdf to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec7.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100809032821/http://www.gpoaccess.gov//911/pdf/sec7.pdf to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/911/pdf/sec7.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:13, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]