Jump to content

Talk:Pleasant Rowland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


References

[edit]

I removed the lack of references tag - I added to this article a while back and drew from a few published articles - which I thought I'd referenced. I added some additional citations today as well as external links. I think this addresses the issue....

If anyone does find anything they feel is missing an adequate citation, please remove it or note it in here. NickBurns 17:55, 30 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

need to find out things on u for school asap it is due on tuesday thank you  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.114.141.57 (talk) 17:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] 
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pleasant Rowland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:35, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

American girl doll

[edit]

Why is that there is only one African American doll being represented as a slave girl? This is not okay nor is it something I would want my child, Nieces, cousin to believe we are just because you can’t see past 100yrs ago. We are STRONG POWERFUL DOCTORS LAWYERS Entrepreneurs QUEENS!!! WE ARE NOT SLAVES. 71.162.2.76 (talk) 16:46, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]