Talk:Pathophysiology

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Medicine Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

cesarean section pathophysiology

There may be a better place in the encyclopedia to explain biochemical indidivduality, and the cautious approach toward defining the normal. But it came to mind here. Any thoughts?

I don't think it should be brought up here. Give it its own article if you want, but as far as general consensus is concerned, the individual differences are overshadowed by the commonalities. Since it hogs a significant part of the article here, it's too much at the wrong place. --OliverH 08:39, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reasonable point you make. I've since done a couple of small things to expand the rest of the article, and will do more. The main reason it "hogs" a lot of the article is that we have a stub here.

Personally, I think some sort of reference to resources that could help one complete a pathophysiology assignment for, let's say, a certain hypothetical nursing class would be greatly appreciated. I know wikipedia has regulations against link farming, but tools to help you gather more information would be helpful. Especially given the emphasis it has in nursing schools. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.51.121.253 (talk) 03:58, August 24, 2007 (UTC)