Talk:H10 Bletcham Way

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Buckinghamshire (inactive) This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Buckinghamshire, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.BuckinghamshireWikipedia:WikiProject BuckinghamshireTemplate:WikiProject BuckinghamshireBuckinghamshire Highways: United Kingdom This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Highways, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of highways on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HighwaysWikipedia:WikiProject HighwaysTemplate:WikiProject HighwaysHighways This article is supported by the United Kingdom Roads Task Force. UK geography Low‑importance This redirect falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

How does it not cite? There is nothing to cite - the route description is a combination of a map of milton keynes and my own knowledge... User:Tom walker 14:00, October 17 2006

I realise the above comment is 7 years old but for the benefit of new editors reading it - "my own knowledge" is not allowed as a basis for content in Wikipedia, as it is impossible for others to verify; although of course it may be used to challenge factually inaccurate content presented by others. If it is based on reading a printed map then the publication data of said map should be included as a citation, particularly the year of its publication as road layouts do get changed from time to time. The article is still under-cited and needs a reference to a published source (being a bit more detailed than just the coordinates, as bare urls are prone to link rot). Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 08:36, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I'd never say that nowadays. At the time Wiki policy was far less clearly outlined. Anyway I've changed it now to a ref to the MK City Atlas that I have. Tom walker (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for that, also added infobox and extra ref, duly reassessed as start-class. Baldy Bill (sharpen the razor|see my reflection) 15:48, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]