Talk:Edwin E. Salpeter

This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Astronomy High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Astronomy, which collaborates on articles related to Astronomy on Wikipedia.AstronomyWikipedia:WikiProject AstronomyTemplate:WikiProject AstronomyAstronomy articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group. Australia Edwin E. Salpeter is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Need help improving this article? Ask a LibrarianWhat's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Salpeter has co-authored most papers published by his daughter Shelley Salpeter (Stanford). Surely worth a mention? JFW | T@lk 22:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Published death date may be incorrect, see this edit. I changed it to a more generic "November 2008." davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 22:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Some reliable sources claim the date of death was November 25. Some say November 26. The editor who changed it to November 26 made a compelling but not conclusive case to me in private communication that the November 26 date is correct and that the November 25 date was due to the wrong date being given to certain members of the press. I accept this date in good faith. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail) 16:10, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]