Talk:Denatonium

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Physiology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Physiology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physiology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhysiologyWikipedia:WikiProject PhysiologyTemplate:WikiProject PhysiologyPhysiology articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. This article has been classified as relating to the physiology of the respiratory system. Food and drink Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Food and Drink task list: edit history watch purge To edit this page, select here Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink: Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish Participate in project-related deletion discussions. Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this. Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here. Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages. Chemicals Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemicals, a daughter project of WikiProject Chemistry, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of chemicals. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details on the project.ChemicalsWikipedia:WikiProject ChemicalsTemplate:WikiProject Chemicalschemicals articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality. The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Is there anything that will dissolve denatonium benzoate quickly (like a glass of milk does with capsaicin)?

It isn't stated what this chemical is made from? Is it synthesized from a particular plant? Badagnani 05:26, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if this issue were addressed. Badagnani (talk) 03:07, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and careful attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 06:45, 4 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted the following anecdote from the intro section of the article: "An anecdote relates how one of the researchers at Atomergic Chemetals Corp. in Plainview, New York, went home without realising that he had a tiny trace of denatonium saccharide on the outside of his lip. When he kissed his wife, she almost vomited." It was sourced "Science '84, as quoted in Reader's Digest (August 1985)"

This looks like an urban legend, to me, especially given its provenance and the anonymous "researcher". Surely, he would have been able to taste the denatonium on his own lips before it had such a dramatic effect on his wife? Dricherby (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that it has no place on the page, however it's entirely plausible that someone would not taste something on their lip, especially if it were on an outer portion of the lip or near the edge (and if the person was not prone to licking their lips.) Do remember that bitter is tasted on the taste buds on the tongue and not in olfactory receptors. --12.52.228.71 (talk) 07:29, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Which sense of "irritation" is intended here?

It is not known to pose any long-term health risks although exposure may be irritating and unpleasant.

I'm guessing psychological irritation, distress, rather than physical inflammation. Could it be replaced with a less ambiguous term? Alternatively, maybe omit the word, if it's just intended as a synonym for unpleasantness? Dependent Variable (talk) 20:30, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Denatonium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616104140/http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/foia99/os/aversive.pdf to http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/foia99/os/aversive.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110616104140/http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/foia99/os/aversive.pdf to http://www.cpsc.gov/LIBRARY/FOIA/foia99/os/aversive.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110106210619/http://www.pestcontrolshop.co.uk:80/acatalog/rats.html to http://www.pestcontrolshop.co.uk/acatalog/rats.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is absolute rubbish that a compound "discovered" in 1958 was first synthesized in 1963. It is not a natural product, so it required (organic laboratory) synthesis. According to Encylopedia.com, W.Barnes working at T.& H.Smith (precursor to Macfarlan Smith) synthesized it in Edinburgh in 1958 INTENTIONALLY as a lidocaine derivative in search of a dental anesthetic. Some of what Encyclopedia.com has to say is wrong. It claims that Barnes added a benzoyl group to lidocaine using benzoic acid (BA). I'd *guess* this is wrong in describing the reactants. But I can't completely rule it out - it would require the loss of OOH, which wouldn't be my first guess as to a viable route. Other sources, INCLUDING the Macfarlane Smith web site (!!) claims the chemical was "discovered by accident". Well, I needed to understand that, since accident implied the compound was unintentional (which is possible, but still much less likely than intentionally making it and discovering it was unsuitable as a dental anesthetic (for obvious reasons) but then observing the taste (and odor)) was not a bug but a feature. (In 1958 chemists would often smell and taste the chemicals they worked with. The literature is full of sensory perceptions that would be grounds for termination now.) I admit to cherry-picking sources here. There are innumerable ways to synthesize any organic compound. There are a handful of notable syntheses : (excluding as a work of art (there are some really beautiful syntheses)) 1. First synthesis 2. First total synthesis (not from natural products) 3. Commercially significant syntheses (both historically and currently and 4. Better purity, faster, or cheaper; not to mention green chemical considerations (less wastes or less energy). To sum up, apparently this article is wrong, it was not Macfarlan Smith that did the work. It was not first synthesized in 1963. I will change both. I can neither confirm nor contradict the claim that the benzyl chloride+lidocaine route was first done in 1963, although why that would be true isn't obvious to me. So, I will change "Macfarlan Smith" to "T. & H. Smith" but leave the link to the Macfarlan page. I will change "It was synthesized for the first time in 1963 by reacting benzyl chloride with lidocaine." to "By 1963 it was made reacting benzyl chloride with lidocaine." The use of "first" should, imho, be avoided until/unless more detailed historical accounts are cited since it clearly was NOT the first synthesis.40.142.183.146 (talk) 00:08, 27 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]