Talk:Blood Harvest (Dicks novel)

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Horror This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter. Novels Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

K-9 Mark II

Since this is the novel in which Romana returns to Gallifrey, and she and K-9 Mark II are specifically seen in novels, audio plays, and the Shada webcast alike, all taking place chronologically later in Romana's personal timeline, it should be noted that the book fails to account for K-9 accompanying her and the Seventh Doctor on the journey back out of E-Space. K-9 is mentioned in an original scene in the prologue that takes place in between parts of "Warrior's Gate", and discussed by the characters, but the prose neglects to specifically describe the Mark II as accompanying them back to Gallifrey. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.125.250.105 (talk) 04:49, 22 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Blood Harvest (Doctor Who novel). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060418042944/http://www.drwhoguide.com:80/whona28p.htm to http://www.drwhoguide.com/whona28p.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:23, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, OliveYouBean, for your work on articles on various books in this series. However, might I suggest that many of these books have significant RS coverage that is being overlooked? In particular, The Who Adventures by David J Howe (ISBN 978-1-84583-185-1) is an invaluable resource with substantial coverage of many titles, and there's also Ahistory: An Unauthorised History of the Doctor Who Universe by Lance Parkin & Lars Pearson (3rd ed.: ISBN 1935234110). I'll try to add material myself, but I just wanted to flag that there is good coverage in non-online sources that answers notability concerns. Bondegezou (talk) 15:36, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bondegezou thanks for the comment. I'm not aware of The Who Adventures, but it looks like it's published by Telos (who published the Doctor Who novellas) so I'm not sure how independent of a source that is for Doctor Who books. From what I've read of An Unauthorised History of the Doctor Who Universe, it only contains plot summaries of various books, which imo isn't enough to satisfy notability requirements because articles are supposed to contain more than just plot summary. If there's content from those books which does talk about the books beyond just plot summary then I'm happy that they can be used to satisfy notability.

I'm aware that there very well could be useful offline sources I'm not aware of, which is why I'm just tagging articles and not mass-redirecting them. I'm trying to slowly put these articles through the AfD process so that there's an opportunity for people with access to offline sources to make a case for notability. OliveYouBean (talk) 04:05, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AFAIK, Telos stopped publishing or selling Dr Who novellas in 2004. The Who Adventures' is from 2021 and doesn't, as far as I recall, even mention the Telos novellas; it's a detailed history of the Virgin books. So I don't see any independence concerns. Bondegezou (talk) 09:58, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]