Jump to content

Talk:Bistro Agnes/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Another Believer (talk · contribs) 23:19, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Relativity (talk · contribs) 22:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey @Another Believer and TrademarkedTWOrantula, I'll be reviewing this against the GA criteria. I should have this review done in a week or so. Relativity ⚡️ 22:31, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Happy to address any concerns you might have. ---Another Believer (Talk) 22:32, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

[edit]

Hold for more

  • (lead) "and previously-owned restaurant"
  • remove hyphen
  • you may want to add that it was the Dentons that owned it
  • (lead) "ChefStable"— I wasn't sure what ChefStable was until I looked it up, so you may want to mention somewhere that it is a restaurant group.
  • (lead) "and was deemed one of the city's best restaurants"— by whom?
  • (description) "American foods including a cheeseburger with Bordelaise sauce."— Bordelaise sauce is not American, and this sentence is a bit confusing; it reads as though the sauce is. The source specifically states that the cheeseburger with Bordelaise sauce is a crossover. Is there some way to reword this so it's clear that the sauce is not American?
  • (shortdesc) In the short description, "U.S." is used. I would recommend changing it per MOS:US and WP:SDFORMAT. The MoS guideline states that you don't have to change U.S. to US if the usage of U.S. is already established in the article, which it isn't. In addition, WP:SDFORMAT states that it's best to keep short descriptions as short as needed, so why not save two characters for a preferred abbreviation? The short description is already at 51 characters— try to minimize character count.
  • (history) "During the COVID-19 pandemic, the Dentons decided to close the restaurant"— While it's okay to put this in the lead because you don't want to get into too much detail, in the history section you may want to specify that it was closed during the COVID-19 pandemic, but specifically March 2020, as the source says.
  • (reception) Regarding Hannah Wallace's review...
  • Over half of Hannah Wallace's review is quoted here, which is a bit overkill. In addition, three sentences are dedicated to her review. One suggestion that I have to improve the amount of quotes that come from her review is to replace ""affable and attentive" service and "awesome" wines" with something like "and praised the restaurant's service and wines".
  • By PDX, does she mean Portland?
  • "vibe" is an informal word (according to the New Oxford American Dictionary). I am aware that the source uses "vibe", but perhaps you can switch this with another word. I suggest "ambience" or "setting".

That's all for now. Relativity ⚡️ 02:38, 2 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Source assessment

[edit]

After checking a large bulk of sources, I think that they fulfill criterion 2b of the GA criteria.

Progress

[edit]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed