Talk:Air-to-air missile

Military history: Aviation / Technology / Weaponry Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force

Minor formatting, added more info on some PRC missiles. -- Adeptitus 07:00, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pure kinetic missiles

When writing the Dutch version of this article, I saw that the English version at some point states: "Some missiles rely partially or wholly on their kinetic energy to damage the target" However, as fast as I know no such missile exists, so I'd like to see some sourcing and/or examples of that before copying it to the Dutch version. - Dammit 10:36, 22 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The LOSAT has an entirely kinetic warhead, but it is a surface to surface missile. There is a version of Starstreak, the ATASK, which can be fired from a helicopter against an air target, but its submunitions are kinetic/explosive, and it hasn't entered production.--71.242.29.26 (talk) 01:49, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Relationship of Laser Guidance to Beam-riding

In the paragraph regarding laser guidance and it's relationship to beam-riding, I believe what is stated is incorrect. Laser guidance as used by "smart bombs" is more akin to semi-active guidance than beam-riding as the guidance system of the bomb homes on reflected laser energy from a "laser designator" and does not "ride the laser beam." Hatcat 04:04, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vympel R-73

I see the Vympel R-73 beign classified as both Fourth and Fifth generation dogfighting missile. If the one classified as fifth generation is an advanced variant, shouldn't it be clarified to avoid confusion? Zeratul2k 01:51, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Done I changed it to R74 (1994–) variant of R73. --Deon Steyn 05:46, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vympel R-73 M2 ("AA-11 Archer") — Russia (1983[7]) Vympel R-77 M1 ("AA-12 Adder") — Russia (1994[8][9]) R-37_(missile) (Tests were completed in 1989[10][11] In the manufacturing and service there[12])

5 generation

This is the actual beginning of the years if there are no sources for the 2000+ year, there must be a real fact of existence. The R-33 since 1980 has a range of 160 km and 0.65 probability of kill it was originally for the destruction cruise missiles, UAVs and large aircraft. Why is it not in the list? 4 is a generation? Hahaha, then 5 generation is too weak for the 4. And overload for maneuver targets 8 g. Why is it not in the list? 4 is a generation? Hahaha, then 5 generation is too weak for the 4.

http://www.airwar.ru/weapon/avv/r33.html http://rbase.new-factoria.ru/missile/wobb/r33/r33.shtml

High Off-Boresite Weapons

Thanks to the F-35, off-boresite is no longer IR only so I'll be adding a section here about this and linking it in from lots of other articles. Hcobb (talk) 13:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 12 external links on Air-to-air missile. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:30, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]