Talk:Afognak

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Alaska Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alaska, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Alaska on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AlaskaWikipedia:WikiProject AlaskaTemplate:WikiProject AlaskaAlaska articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Islands This article is within the scope of WikiProject Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of islands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject IslandsTemplate:WikiProject IslandsIslands articles

There are at least three Afognaks now: Afognak the island, Afognak, Alaska, the former village located on the island, and Native Village of Afognak, the federally recognized tribe of Alutiiqs descended from the inhabitants of Afognak. It seems wise to me to change this page's name (i.e., to move it) to "Afognak Island" and use the page called Afognak as a disambiguation page pointing to the three (so far) Afognak-related pages. I'm seeking consensus if there are other editors for whom this is an issue, pro or con. Thanks. --Yksin 21:24, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Typical Wikipedia practice in this situation is to put the most general article under the primary name, and then write a disambiguation page. I'll write that now. -Harmil 02:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that works great. Good to know the best practice in this regard. --Yksin 16:16, 14 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Afognak. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607212105/http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_P001&-tree_id=4001&-redoLog=true&-transpose=N&-all_geo_types=N&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=100$10000US021500001002009&-geo_id=100$10000US021500001002010&-search_results=100$10000US021640001001979&-format=&-_lang=en&-show_geoid=Y to http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/DTTable?_bm=y&-context=dt&-ds_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U&-CONTEXT=dt&-mt_name=DEC_2000_SF1_U_P001&-tree_id=4001&-redoLog=true&-transpose=N&-all_geo_types=N&-_caller=geoselect&-geo_id=100$10000US021500001002009&-geo_id=100$10000US021500001002010&-search_results=100$10000US021640001001979&-format=&-_lang=en&-show_geoid=Y

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]