Jump to content

Rudolf Herrnstadt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Rudolf Herrnstadt
Herrnstadt – a 1952 sketch
Born(1903-03-18)18 March 1903
Died28 August 1966(1966-08-28) (aged 63)
OccupationJournalist

Rudolf Herrnstadt (18 March 1903 – 28 August 1966) was a German journalist and communist politician. After abandoning his law studies in 1922, Herrnstadt became a convinced communist. Despite his bourgeois origins, he was accepted into the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) in 1931 and worked for the Soviet military intelligence service Glawnoje Raswedywatelnoje Uprawlenije (GRU, "Main Administration for Intelligence"). As a foreign correspondent for the Berliner Tageblatt, he worked in Prague (1930), Warsaw (1931 to 1936) and Moscow (1933). He emigrated to the Soviet Union in 1939, days before the Invasion of Poland, where he was active in the fight against the Nazi state as editor-in-chief of the newspaper Freies Deutschland in the National Committee for a Free Germany from 1944 during the German-Soviet War.

After the end of World War II, Herrnstadt returned to Berlin in 1945, where he became the founding figure of the post-war press in Germany. He was editor-in-chief of the Berliner Zeitung, initially in the Soviet occupation zone and from 1949 in the German Democratic Republic (GDR), and played a key role in founding the Berliner Verlag publishers and the left-wing newspaper Neues Deutschland, the central organ of the Socialist Unity Party (SED). From 1950 to 1953 he was a member of the Central Committee (ZK) of the SED and a candidate for the Politburo of the SED.

In the early 1950s, Herrnstadt campaigned for democratization within the SED, but lost the power struggle against the General Secretary of the Central Committee, Walter Ulbricht. After the uprising of 17 June 1953, where Herrnstadt had shown understanding for the protests in articles in Neues Deutschland, he and other opponents of Ulbricht lost their seat on the Central Committee for "forming anti-party factions." In the same year, he also lost his position as editor-in-chief of Neues Deutschland. In 1954, he was expelled from the SED and was not rehabilitated until the end of his life.

Life

[edit]

Rudolf Herrnstadt came from a Jewish family in the Upper Silesian city of Gleiwitz (now Gliwice, Poland). His mother Maria-Clara came from a merchant family that had become wealthy after 1870.[1] His father Dr Ludwig Herrnstadt worked as a lawyer and notary in Gleiwitz, and - despite his legal work for various large companies - had been a member of the Social Democratic Party of Germany (SPD) since 1894[2] and was a social democratic city councillor in Gleiwitz.[3] In a CV written for the Soviet military intelligence service around 1930, Rudolf Herrnstadt wrote that his father earned around 1,200 Reichsmarks a month, while the monthly salary of an Upper Silesian industrial worker fluctuated between 80 and 150 marks. He therefore describes his father as a "member of the Jewish sector of the upper bourgeoisie".[1] He had a brother Ernst Herrnstadt, born in 1906.[3]

While exiled in Moscow, Herrnstadt met Valentina Veloyants (Валентина Велоянца), a scholar of Germany and together had a child Irina Liebmann who would go on to be journalist and well known author as well as a sinologist of Russo-German provenance.[4]

Education

[edit]

Herrnstadt attended the Catholic grammar school in Gleiwitz from 1912 to 1921 and began studying law in 1921, initially at the Friedrich Wilhelm University in Berlin and then at the Ruprecht Karl University in Heidelberg from March 1922. In October 1922, Herrnstadt informed his parents that he did not want to continue his studies but wanted to work as a writer in the future. His father then ordered that his underage son had to work in the Upper Silesian pulp mills.[3] Herrnstadt worked there until autumn 1924 as a payroll clerk, cashier, warehouse manager and finally as secretary to the management.[5]

Against his parents' wishes, Herrnstadt returned to Berlin in November 1924.[3] He earned his living from support payments from his parents and as an editor for the Drei-Masken publishing house, while at the same time working as a freelance writer. In May 1928 he applied to the left-wing Berliner Tageblatt and was initially employed as an unpaid assistant editor, and from autumn 1928 as a typesetter (known as a technical editor).[3][5] He was one of the journalists promoted by Theodor Wolff. However, in November 1929, Herrnstadt was sacked by the Rudolf Mosse publishing company for writing a sensationalist story about 240,000 workers in the Ruhr region who had been locked out of work.[6] Businesses using the paper for advertising threatened to withdraw their advertising budget, but Wolff brought Herrnstadt back to work in the editors office.[3] Within the publishing house, Herrnstadt was known as a communist and was considered to be a member of the Communist Party of Germany (KPD) due to particular opinions he held.[7]

At the newspaper, Herrnstadt met the aspiring German editor Ilse Stöbe,[8] eight years his junior and became good friends with her.[9] The couple eventually became engaged.[10] Herrnstadt believed that the political ideology of capitalism with its inherent structural problems in the 1920s would be replaced by socialism, or indeed communism.[7] From the beginning, Stöbe shared the same political ideology as Herrnstadt. There was an expectation that both of them would join the KPD.[11][12] However, a study by the German historian Elke Scherstjanoi found that the couple were told by a KPD official in the Karl Liebknecht house that they were more useful to the communist party working outside the KPD.[13][a] On 5 June 1930, Herrnstadt became the correspondent for the Berliner Tageblatt in Prague.[14] While there he repeatedly tried to join the communist party.[15] His persistence brought him to the notice of Soviet military intelligence, who recruited him as a Red Army GRU agent[15] and gave him the codename "Arbin".[16]

Resistance

[edit]

When Herrnstadt returned to Berlin in 1931, he introduced Stöbe to "Dr. Bosch", who in reality was the Soviet rezident in Berlin, the Latvian Jewish communist and historian Yakov Bronin [ru] (1904–1984).[17] Bronin recruited Stöbe as an agent for the GRU. Her codename was "Arnim".[18][16]

Warsaw

[edit]

In 1931, Herrnstadt was sent to Warsaw as a foreign correspondent for the Berliner Tageblatt.[16] and found an apartment in Nowogrodzka.[19] In Germany, the arrival of Adolf Hitler at the seat of power would have made Herrnstadt a target, both as an unrepentant communist activist and as a Jew.

Herrnstadt began the cultivation of a group of left-leaning, liberal anti-nazis[20] as part of establishing a residenzy. By 1936, these included folk from the Germany embassy that included the ambassador Hans-Adolf von Moltke, the legation councillor Rudolf von Scheliha and the press-secretary Hans Graf Huyn [de],[20] as well as connections to the Polish writer Jarosław Iwaszkiewicz, poet Julian Tuwim, the actress Ida Kaminska and the Polish foreign minister Josef Beck.[19] Herrnstadt's espionage group in Warsaw was made up of him and Stöbe and included Gerhard Kegel [de] and his wife Charlotte Vogt, the couple Marta (Margarita) and lawyer Kurt Welkisch [ru], at times also the publisher Helmut Kindler [de] and his childhood friend, the lawyer Lothar Bolz.[21] Kindler in his book "Zum Abschied ein Fest : die Autobiographie eines deutschen Verlegers" (A farewell party: the autobiography of a German publisher) describes how he was recruited for a short time.[22]

After the German-Polish non-aggression pact concluded in 1934, Herrnstadt "turned his attention entirely to efforts to create a security alliance between Poland and Hitler's Germany."[23]

Unemployment

[edit]

By 1936, using the Editor's Law, the Reich Ministry of Public Enlightenment and Propaganda had removed many foreign Jewish correspondents and by that point only a few remained. Herrnstadt was one of them.[24] On 12 March 1936, Herrnstadt left the Berliner Tageblatt[25] when liberal editor-in-chief Paul Scheffler resigned from his post.[26]

Although Moltke was politically sympathetic to Herrnstadt, he couldn't defend him as he was Jewish. [25] From that point forward, he avoided all contact with him.[27] Rudolf von Scheliha was of a different mettle and continued to maintain contact with Herrnstadt and the Stöbe, although their meetings were kept secret.[28] Both Herrnstadt and von Scheliha had similar political views on the Nazis, however, they had different views on the Soviet Union as von Scheliha was opposed to communism.[28] To convince him otherwise, Herrnstadt decided to persuade Von Scheliha to pass embassy reports by disguising the delivery location of the intelligence, i.e. to show they weren't going to the Soviet Union.[26][28] In 1937, he travelled to England and through Communist International agent Ernest David Weiss and his sub-agent Ilse Steinfeld, a journalist for the Berliner Tageblatt who worked for The Guardian, he met the German legation councillor Hermann von Stutterheim (1887–1959)[29] of the German embassy in London.[b][30] When he returned to Warsaw, he informed Von Scheliha that had met a contact in England, who was an "intermediary" for the secret service who was interested in the political situation in Poland. He further informed him that he was authorised to act for this intermediary.[30] This finally convinced Von Scheliha by mid-September to begin supplying embassy reports. From November 1937 to August 1939, Herrnstadt supplied 211 intelligence report to the Soviet Union that were considered valuable.[30] On 16 August 1939, Von Scheliha reported that an Invasion of Poland was to begin on 1 September 1939.[31]

Exile in Moscow

[edit]

With the invasion of Poland by the Wehrmacht in 1939, Herrnstadt fled to the Soviet Union and came to reside in Moscow, where he applied and was accepted into the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.[32] Despite criticism from some members of the German exile community for his "anti-revolutionary" views, Herrnstadt was among the members of the National Committee for a Free Germany (NKFD). He was briefy editor of the Das freie Wort, the newspaper of German prisoners of war in the Soviet Union.[33]

At the beginning of June 1943, Herrnstadt and Alfred Kurella began writing a committee manifesto for the formation of the NKFD.[34] This text "Manifest an die Wehrmacht und das deutsche Volk" (Manifesto to the Wehrmacht and the German People) praised historical figures from the Kingdom of Prussia who had allied with Imperial Russia against Napoleon in the German Campaign of 1813; figures such as Heinrich Friedrich Karl vom und zum Stein, Carl von Clausewitz and Graf Yorck were depicted as exemplary Germans. In 1943 when the NKFD formed, he began working as editor-in-chief on the weekly Freies Deutschland the newspaper of the NKFD.[35] On 14 September he was elected member of the committee.[35] According to a report by German political author and historian Wolfgang Leonhard, his "upper-class past" was evident, among other things, from the fact that while he was still working in the Soviet Union as chief editor of the Freies Deutschland newspaper, he attracted attention by addressing his subordinates using the formal "You".[36]

When the Moscow-based KPD leadership established a special commission to prepare for the defeat and return to Germany, Herrnstadt was one of the committee members.[35] Herrnstadt co-wrote the KPD guidelines for KPD functionaries working in Germany.[33]

Return to Germany

[edit]

On 15 May 1945, Herrnstadt returned to Germany as a member of the Sobottka Group, which laid the groundwork for the Soviet Military Administration in Germany in Mecklenburg.[37] He had instructions from the Red Army to create a new non-partisan newspaper.[38] Herrnstadt was appointed to lead as editor-in-chief of the centre-left East German daily newspaper Berliner Zeitung, initially published the Soviet administration in the Soviet Zones but later becoming the organ of the Magistrate of Berlin. The first employees of the Red Army paper were the writers Helmut Kindler [de], the writer Gerhard Grindel [de] and the photographer Eva Kemlein [de].[39] On 21 May, the first version of the paper with headline "Berlin is alive!" was published, selling 100,000 copies.[39] Over the next several weeks, Herrnstadt arranged for former journalists including Günther Kertzscher [de], Bernt von Kügelgen [de], Friedrich Rücker and Gerhard Dengler to join him at the paper. Gerhard Kegel became the deputy editor-in-chief.[39] In August 1945, Herrnstaft founded the general Allgemeiner Deutscher Verlag publishing house with himself, Kegel and Friedrich Notz as managing directors.[40] In the autumn of 1945, Herrnstadt bought the Theresienhof estate as a holiday home for German publishing employees.[41] On 11 October, he founded the newspaper and magazine publishing house, Berliner Verlag [de] that was under the control of the SED. Herrnstadt became the publishing director.[41] Berlin Verlag took over publishing of the Berliner Zeitung. In January 1947, a printing works was started that was completed a year later.[41] In a letter dated 2 October 1947, Herrnstadt stated the publishing houses employed 1700 people, but it wasn't the only publishing he developed.[41] He also published the weekly contemporary magazine Neue Berliner Illustrierte beginning in October 1945, the women's magazine Die Frau von heute [de] that began publication in February 1946, a youth magazine Start and the political magazine Demokratischer Aufbau.[42]

Politics

[edit]

On 18 November 1948, Herrnstadt published a controversial article in the Neues Deutschland titled "Über, die Russen' und über uns" ("About ‘the Russians’ and about Us")[43][44] addressed to the membership of the SED, at the time consisting of some 1.8million people.[45] Herrnstadt, an exemplary communist who believed that Germany society couldn't develop without the help of the Soviet Union,[46] could no longer stand the comments made against the Soviet occupying force,[46] and criticised German citizens who felt they had been mistreated or abused through rape in the closing months of the war.[43] Although Herrnstadt was defending Russian forces, for the first time, the barabarism of the Red Army was openly discussed, in effect breaking the official silence on the subject, which was considered taboo, even under occupation law.[46] Herrnstadt used a metaphor about a German girl who had her “bike stolen by a Soviet soldier", in effect had been raped, but defended the Russians by stating that Germans should "understand" such incidences[46] The article was effectively promotional and called for the unconditional recognition of the leading role of the Soviet Union in Germany society.[46] Widely read and discussed, it led to German protests and a public discussion between the Soviet Union and Germany on fascism, the end of the war and what happened. Possibly the only open discussion in East Germany[47] When it was over, the Russians decided the topic wouldn't be discussed again and the crimes would be forgotten or repressed[43] From June 1949 to July 1953, Herrnstadt was editor-in-chief of left-wing daily newspaper Neues Deutschland (New Germany) in East Berlin[33] the central organ of the SED.

As editor-in-chief, he always allowed Neues Deutschland to follow the line laid down by Moscow. Even when this line took on anti-Semitic characteristics in connection with an alleged doctors' conspiracy in the Soviet Union, he did not deviate from it. For example, on 14 January 1953, Neues Deutschland published biting attacks against allegedly "demoralized bourgeois Jewish nationalists" - as Herrnstadt was of both upper middle-class and Jewish origin, he had to fear that this could soon also mean himself.[48]

As a reflection of his standing within the party, Herrnstadt was elected to the Central Committee of the SED during the 3rd Party Congress in July 1950, a position he held until 1953. He was also a candidate for the Politburo of the SED.[35]

SED Reforms

[edit]
Walter Ulbricht (left) with Herrnstadt, 1951

After the death of Joseph Stalin on 5 March 1953, on 2 June, the Soviet Union ordered the SED to adopt the New Course, which was intended to reverse or slow down the construction of socialism in the GDR that had been pushed forward since 1952. Herrnstadt was initially skeptical about this course. When he complained to the new Soviet High Commissioner Vladimir Semyonov about the speed of the ordered change of course, the latter replied: "In 14 days you may no longer have a state."[49][50] On the 9 June, within the Politburo, Herrnstadt now positioned himself together with the Minister for State Security Wilhelm Zaisser and leading party ideologist, as an opponent of Ulbricht. They had the Soviet secret service chief Lavrenti Beria on their side, who seemed to be the coming strong man of the Soviet Union after Stalin's death. On 14 June 1953, Herrnstadt had a critical report published in Neues Deutschland under the title "It's time to put the sledgehammer aside" (Den Holzhammer beiseite legen). The authors critically examined the dictatorial methods used by the SED to decide on the increase in work standards at the VEB Wohnungsbau [de] and to announce this for 30 June.[51] Even if the article did not demand the withdrawal of the increase in standards, it nevertheless acted as a beacon, as it showed that the policies of the Central Committee General Secretary Walter Ulbricht were controversial even within the inner circles of power in the SED.[52]

Herrnstadt became a member of a "commission of the Politburo to draw up proposals for organizational changes," in which he and Zaisser openly criticized the bureaucratic and dictatorial leadership style of Ulbricht and Hermann Matern, who as chairman of the Central Party Control Commission (ZPKK) was responsible for internal party discipline. Herrnstadt was also appointed to an editorial committee of the Politburo, which was to formulate the new course of the party line validly by the next meeting of the Central Committee. The Soviet ambassador in East Berlin, Ivan Ilyichov, asked him to join Zaisser in calling on Ulbricht to step down from power: "He is a sensible man, he will understand that. Well, and if he doesn't want to understand, then tell us and we will take action."[53][54]

On 16 June 1953, the Central Committee approved the New Course, which Herrnstadt helped to formulate:

"It is about creating a German Democratic Republic that will find the approval of all honest Germans for its prosperity, its social justice, its legal security, its deeply national characteristics and its liberal atmosphere."

Only in this way could German unity be restored.[54] How serious Herrnstadt was about this is disputed in research: Klaus Schroeder did not believe that he and Zaisser wanted to question the leading role of the SED. Wilfried Loth, on the other hand, saw the declaration as an indication that the Soviet Union "did not want the GDR" and - as in the Stalin notes of 1952 - would have preferred a neutral, democratic, united Germany.[55]

Against Walter Ulbricht

[edit]

However, because the increase in standards was not withdrawn, the New Course was no longer able to stop the 1953 East German Uprising of 17 June 1953, which initially weakened Ulbricht's position in the SED and the Soviet Union. After the suppression by troops of the Group of Soviet Forces in Germany, Herrnstadt and Zaisser continued their work on dismantling Ulbricht. On 26 June, the Organizing Commission drew up a new leadership concept for the party: instead of the all-powerful General Secretary at the top, there was to be a collective leadership. To facilitate the change, Zaisser issued a Politburo motion to replace Ulbricht with Herrnstadt as SED First Secretary. At Herrnstadt's request, Ulbricht was prepared to relinquish the party leadership.[54] On the night of 7–8 July 1953, Herrnstadt presented the commission's proposals to the Politburo. Zaisser, Friedrich Ebert, Heinrich Rau and Elli Schmidt agreed with him; only Matern and Erich Honecker spoke in favor of Ulbricht.[56]

Ulbricht accused Herrnstadt of “factionalism” and “social democratism” - both of which had been considered a serious breach of party discipline since the SED had transformed itself into a new type of party in 1948–49. However, Ulbricht again declared his willingness to resign: “All right, if everyone sees it that way, please, I'm not clinging to the post.” However, the Politburo did not make a formal decision to dismiss him.[57][58]

Walter Ulbricht was summoned for a visit to Moscow with the new Soviet leadership the following day. He was criticized for his introduction of collective farms and a slower course towards socialist construction. However, the situation reversed after Nikita Khrushchev, the Secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, consolidated power over the Soviet government in Moscow and purged Ulbricht's opponent Lavrentiy Beria when he was arrested on 26 June.[59] Khrushchev and Prime Minister Georgi Malenkov supported Ulbricht. With their backing, Ulbricht appeared before the Central Committee Plenum of the SED on 24 July 1953 and presented a text that had not been agreed with the Politburo. He presented the New Course as the cause of the “fascist putsch” (the official GDR term for the uprising of 17 June 1953) and attacked Herrnstadt, whom he accused of “directly supporting the strikers”. He constructed a direct link between the “Herrnstadt-Zaisser faction” and the ousted Beria, whose allegedly “capitulatory attitude [...] must have led to the restoration of capitalism.” The other Politburo members therefore did not dare to protest, and the other CC members considered the text to have been agreed.[60] Herrnstadt's dissension against the course of the Ulbricht faction was also criticized by Soviet adviser Vladimir Semyonov, who answered Herrnstadt's attack by replying that "in two weeks you may no longer have a state."[49]

After the plenary session, a journalistic campaign orchestrated by Ulbricht's collaborator Karl Schirdewan began against Herrnstadt and Zaisser, who were publicly described as “Trotskyists” and “enemies of the German people and the party of the working class”.[61] Like other opponents of Ulbricht, Herrnstadt lost his seats in the Politburo and Central Committee on 26 July 1953 for “anti-party factionalism”. In the same year, he also lost his position as editor-in-chief of Neues Deutschland. Herrnstadt admitted all the accusations made against him and criticized himself [de] to the ZPKK.[62][63] The SED expelled Herrnstadt on 23 January 1954.[64]

Central archives

[edit]

On 1 October 1953, Herrnstadt took over management of the Central Archives in Merseburg.[65]

Herrnstadt died on 28 August 1966.

Rehabilitation

[edit]

In 1961, the SED offered Herrnstadt readmission to the party on the condition that he remained silent. However, after the public slander to which he had been subjected, he insisted on being rehabilitated. Herrnstadt therefore refused to rejoin the SED.[66] On 29 November 1989, 23 years after his death, the ZPKK under Werner Eberlein rehabilitated Herrnstadt in the course of the peaceful revolution in the GDR.[66]

Notes

[edit]
  1. ^ Herrnstadt joined the KPD in 1 July 1931 with membership number 521173 under the code name Friedrich Brockmann.[7]
  2. ^ Coppi and Kebir mistake the Romanian embassy for the German embassy in the text of Ilse Stöbe: Wieder im Amt in page 52 as Baron Von Stutterheim was a diplomat in the Germany embassy not the Romanian embassy, although refer to the German embassy further on in the text.[30]

References

[edit]

Citations

[edit]
  1. ^ a b Liebmann 2008, p. 42.
  2. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 22.
  3. ^ a b c d e f Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 23.
  4. ^ "Irina Liebmann,deutsche Schriftstellerin und Sinologin". Munzinger Archiv GmbH, Ravensburg. 3 February 2015. Retrieved 20 October 2024.
  5. ^ a b Liebmann 2008, p. 43.
  6. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 46.
  7. ^ a b c Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 24.
  8. ^ Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 24-25.
  9. ^ Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 27.
  10. ^ Coppi, Danyel & Tuchel 1994, pp. 262–264.
  11. ^ Adams 2009, p. 2009.
  12. ^ Müller-Enbergs 1991a, p. 31.
  13. ^ Scherstjanoi 2013, p. 14.
  14. ^ Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 25.
  15. ^ a b Scherstjanoi 2014, p. 148.
  16. ^ a b c Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 29.
  17. ^ Müller-Enbergs 1991b.
  18. ^ Scherstjanoi 2013, p. 15.
  19. ^ a b Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 40.
  20. ^ a b Scherstjanoi 2014, p. 149.
  21. ^ Müller-Enbergs 1991a, pp. 31–35.
  22. ^ Kindler 1992, pp. 142–144.
  23. ^ Adams 2009, p. 184.
  24. ^ Müller-Enbergs 1991a, p. 21.
  25. ^ a b Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 42.
  26. ^ a b Liebmann 2008, p. 73.
  27. ^ Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 50.
  28. ^ a b c Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 51.
  29. ^ Mas & Harsch 2020, p. 1953.
  30. ^ a b c d Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 52.
  31. ^ Coppi & Kebir 2013, p. 53.
  32. ^ Grieder 1999, p. 54.
  33. ^ a b c Bundesstiftung Aufarbeitung 2009.
  34. ^ Scriba 2014.
  35. ^ a b c d Zimmermann 1969.
  36. ^ Leonhard 1955, p. 292.
  37. ^ Das Bundesarchiv 1945.
  38. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 161.
  39. ^ a b c Liebmann 2008, p. 170.
  40. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 177.
  41. ^ a b c d Liebmann 2008, p. 240.
  42. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 293.
  43. ^ a b c Dack 2008.
  44. ^ Bertsch 2012.
  45. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 189.
  46. ^ a b c d e Liebmann 2008, p. 190.
  47. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 193.
  48. ^ Loth 1994, p. 195.
  49. ^ a b Maier 1999, p. 17.
  50. ^ Scherstjanoi 1998.
  51. ^ Grün & Stern 1953.
  52. ^ Schroeder 1998, p. 122.
  53. ^ Stulz-Herrnstadt 1990, p. 79.
  54. ^ a b c Loth 1994, p. 206.
  55. ^ Loth 1994, pp. 205–217.
  56. ^ Hoffmann & Schmid 1993, p. 174.
  57. ^ Schroeder 1998, p. 126.
  58. ^ Liebmann 2008, p. 353.
  59. ^ Baras 1975.
  60. ^ Stulz-Herrnstadt 1990, p. 140.
  61. ^ Stulz-Herrnstadt 1990, p. 190.
  62. ^ Wolf & McElvoy 1999, p. 69.
  63. ^ "Erklärung von Rudolf Herrnstadt an die Zentrale Parteikontrollkommission der SED, Merseburg, 31. August 1953". Federal Agency for Civic Education (in German). Bonn: SED. 31 August 1953. Archived from the original on 10 Feb 2013. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  64. ^ Kramer 1999.
  65. ^ Der Spiegel 1953.
  66. ^ a b Fricke 2008.

Bibliography

[edit]
  • Adams, Jefferson (1 September 2009). Historical Dictionary of German Intelligence. Scarecrow Press. ISBN 978-0-8108-6320-0.
  • Baras, Victor (1975). "Beria's Fall and Ulbricht's Survival". Soviet Studies. 27 (3): 381–395. doi:10.1080/09668137508411013. ISSN 0038-5859. JSTOR 150443.
  • Bertsch, Herbert (22 July 2012). ""Über die Russen und über uns" – wieder aktuell?" (in German). Berlin: Freundeskreis des Blättchens. Das Blättchen. Retrieved 19 October 2024.
  • Coppi, Hans Coppi; Danyel, Jürgen; Tuchel, Johannes (1994). Die Rote Kapelle im Widerstand gegen den Nationalsozialismus [The Red Orchestra in Resistance to National Socialism]. Schriften der Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand. Vol. 1. Gedenkstätte Deutscher Widerstand. ISBN 978-3-89468-110-4. OCLC 31510338.
  • Coppi, Hans; Kebir, Sabine (2013). Ilse Stöbe : wieder im Amt : eine Widerstandskämpferin in der Wilhelmstrasse : eine Veröffentlichung der Rosa-Luxemburg-Stiftung [Ilse Stöbe: back in office: a resistance fighter in the Wilhelmstrasse: a publication of the Rosa Luxemburg Foundation] (in German). Hamburg: VSA. ISBN 978-3-89965-569-8. OCLC 856798644.
  • Dack, Mikkel (2008). "Crimes Committed By Soviet Soldiers Against German Civilians, 1944-1945: A Historiographical Analysis". Journal of Military and Strategic Studies. 10 (4). Waterloo, Ontario: University of Waterloo.
  • Fricke, Karl Wilhelm (17 March 2008). Erst Spion, dann Unperson. Deutschlandfunk (in German). Cologne: Deutschlandradio. Retrieved 24 October 2024.
  • Grieder, Peter (1999). The East German leadership, 1946 - 1973: conflict and crisis (1st ed.). Manchester: Manchester University Press. ISBN 9780719054983. OCLC 59458638.
  • Kindler, Helmut (1992). Zum Abschied ein Fest : die Autobiographie eines deutschen Verlegers [A farewell party : the autobiography of a German publisher] (in German). Munich: Droemer Knaur. ISBN 3426750422. OCLC 468300078.
  • Grün, Siegfried; Stern, Käthe (14 June 1953). "Es wird Zeit, den Holzhammer beiseite zu legen" (in German). Berlin: SED. Neues Deutschland. Archived from the original on 15 July 2012. Retrieved 20 October 2024.
  • Hoffmann, Dierk; Schmid, Karl-Heinz (1993). Skyba, Peter (ed.). Die DDR vor dem Mauerbau: Dokumente zur Geschichte des anderen deutschen Staates, 1949-1961. Serie Piper, 1799 (in German). München: Piper. ISBN 9783492117999. OCLC 246414094.
  • Kramer, Mark (1999). "The Early Post-Stalin Succession Struggle and Upheavals in East-Central Europe: Internal-External Linkages in Soviet Policy Making (Part 3)". Journal of Cold War Studies. 1 (3): 3–66. ISSN 1520-3972. JSTOR 26925028.
  • Leonhard, Wolfgang (1955). Die Revolution entlässt ihre Kinder Die Revolution entlässt ihre Kinder (in German). Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch. OCLC 3368296.
  • Liebmann, Irina (2008). Wäre es schön? Es wäre schön! mein Vater Rudolf Herrnstadt [Would it be nice? It would be nice! my father Rudolf Herrnstadt] (in German). Berlin: Berlin Verlag. ISBN 978-3827005892. OCLC 213434556.
  • Loth, Wilfried (1994). Stalins ungeliebtes Kind: warum Moskau die DDR nicht wollte [Stalin's unloved child: why Moscow didn't want the GDR] (in German). Berlin: Rowohlt. ISBN 9783871340857. OCLC 30475448.
  • Mas, Dorothy A.; Harsch, Georg Felix (20 July 2020). Löw, Andrea; Pearce, Caroline (eds.). German Reich and Protectorate of Bohemia and Moravia September 1939–September 1941. Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG. ISBN 978-3-11-052389-8. OCLC 1289822043.
  • Maier, Charles S. (1999). "In 14 Tagen werden Sie vielleicht schon keinen Staat mehr haben". Dissolution: The crisis of Communism and the end of East Germany. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. ISBN 9780691007465. OCLC 43263435.
  • Müller-Enbergs, Helmut (1991a). Der Fall Rudolf Herrnstadt: Tauwetterpolitik vor dem 17. Juni [The case of Rudolf Herrnstadt: Thaw policy before 17 June] (in German). Berlin: Christoph Links Verlag. ISBN 978-3-86153-003-9.
  • Müller-Enbergs, Helmut (1991b). "Welchen Charakter hatte die Volkskammer nach den Wahlen am 18. März 1990?". In Klingemann, HD; Stöss, R; Weßels, B (eds.). Politische Klasse und politische Institutionen [Political class and political institutions]. Schriften des Zentralinstituts für sozialwissenschaftliche Forschung der Freien Universität Berlin. Vol. 66. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. pp. 235–255. doi:10.1007/978-3-322-94153-4_10. ISBN 978-3-531-12306-6.
  • Scherstjanoi, Elke (2014). "Verräterin oder Patriotin? Ein Gutachten des Instituts für Zeitgeschichte" [Traitor or patriot? An expert opinion by the Institute of Contemporary History]. Vierteljahrshefte für Zeitgeschichte (in German). 62 (1). Munich: De Gruyter Oldenbourg (Deutschland): 139–156. doi:10.1515/vfzg-2014-0006. S2CID 199575964.
  • Schroeder, Klaus (1998). Der SED-Staat Geschichte und Strukturen der DDR. Bayerische Landeszentrale für Politische Bildungsarbeit, 104 (in German). Munich: Bayerische Landeszentrale für Politische Bildungsarbeit. OCLC 75913403.
  • Scriba, Arnulf (22 August 2014). "Das Nationalkomitee "Freies Deutschland" (NKFD)". Deutsches Historisches Museum (in German). Berlin: Lebendiges Museum Online. Archived from the original on 20 October 2024. Retrieved 20 October 2024.
  • "Die Tätigkeit der "Gruppe Ulbricht" in Berlin von April bis Juni 1945 "Namensliste der drei KPD-Einsatzgruppen vom 27. April 1945"". Das Bundesarchiv , BArch NY 4036/517 (in German). 27 April 1945. Archived from the original on 15 December 2014. Retrieved 22 November 2011.
  • "Herrnstadt, Rudolf". Bundesstiftung Aufarbeitung (in German). Berlin: Bundesstiftung zur Aufarbeitung der SED-Diktatur. October 2009. Archived from the original on 12 October 2024. Retrieved 12 October 2024.
  • Scherstjanoi, Elke (1998). ""In 14 Tagen werden Sie vielleicht schon keinen Staat mehr haben", Vladimir Semenov und der 17. Juni 1953". Deutschland Archiv. 31 (6). de: 907–937.
  • Scherstjanoi, Elke (27 August 2013). "Ilse Stöbe (1911 - 1942) im Widerstand gegen das "Dritte Reich"" [Ilse Stöbe (1911 - 1942) in the resistance against the "Third Reich] (PDF). Institut für Zeitgeschichte. Munich: Leibniz Institute of Contemporary History. Retrieved 11 February 2023.
  • Stulz-Herrnstadt, Nadja (1990). Das Herrnstadt-Dokument: das Politbüro der SED und die Geschichte des 17. Juni 1953 [The Herrnstadt Document. The Politburo of the SED and the history of June 17, 1953] (in German). Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt. ISBN 9783499128370. OCLC 25025392.
  • Wolf, Markus; McElvoy, Anne (1999). Man without a face : the autobiography of communism's greatest spymaster. PublicAffairs. ISBN 978-1-891620-12-6. OCLC 759837997.
  • Zimmermann, Hartmut (1969). "Herrnstadt, Rudolf". Neue Deutsche Biographie (in German). Vol. 8. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot. pp. 693–695.
  • "Rudolf Herrnstadt" (in German). Spiegel-Verlag. Der Spiegel. 20 October 1953. Archived from the original on 15 October 2024. Retrieved 13 October 2024.

Further reading

[edit]
  • Herrnstadt, Rudolf (1964). Bundesministerium für Gesamtdeutsche Fragen (ed.). SBZ - biographie; ein biographisches nachschlagebuch über die Sowjetische besatzungszone Deutschlands SBZ - biographie; ein biographisches nachschlagebuch über die Sowjetische besatzungszone Deutschlands, Zusammengestellt vom Untersuchungsausschuß Freiheitlicher Juristen (in German). Bonn: Deutscher Bundes-Verlag. p. 146. OCLC 1591319.
  • Geder, Walter (1970). "Herrnstadt, Rudolf". Geschichte der deutschen Arbeiterbewegung : Biographisches Lexikon (in German). Berlin: Dietz. pp. 200–201. OCLC 1709826.
  • Görldt, Andrea (2002). Rudolf Herrnstadt und Wilhelm Zaisser: ihre Konflikte in der SED-Führung im Kontext innerparteilicher Machtsicherung und sowjetischer Deutschlandpolitik. Europäische Hochschulschriften, Bd. 457, v. 457 (in German). Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang. ISBN 3-631-39895-6. OCLC 50970037.
  • Marx, Christoph (2017). Politische Presse im Nachkriegsberlin 1945-1953 Erik Reger und Rudolf Herrnstadt (in German). Stuttgart: ibidem-Verlag. ISBN 9783838269856. OCLC 1188335434.
  • Riegel, Klaus-Georg (1991). "Gesinnung und Disziplin: Die Selbstdarstellung eines Parteidissidenten (Herrnstadt) der SED". Zeitschrift für Politik (in German). 38 (3): 255–273. ISSN 0044-3360. JSTOR 24227229.
  • Naturfreundejugend Berlin Arbeitskreis "Stalin hat uns das Herz gebrochen" (2017). Stalin hat uns das Herz gebrochen: Antisemitismus in der DDR und die Verfolgung jüdischer Kommunist*innen (in German) (1st ed.). Münster: Edition assemblage. ISBN 978-3-942885-33-1. OCLC 1005620080.
[edit]