Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/List of Republics/Evidence

Nema: this isn't an accusation; I would still be equally content with leaving WHEELER alone, and accepting his recursion in another few months as being as inevitable as the weather. But if ArbCom is to affect the situation, they must, I argue, use their teeth. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 22:10, 23 July 2007 (UTC) ^{(Comment copied from main page by Nema Fakei)}[reply]

If this is about my evidence section as it currently stands (a single paragraph introduction), I'm not going to avoid giving evidence, I've got a good chunk of sections, I'm collecting diffs at the moment. I just want to write an evidence-plus-commentary contribution rather than a rant-with-evidence. --Nema Fakei 22:59, 23 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see that you interpreted my paragraph as a direct criticism of your evidence presentation. Not intended as such. --Nema Fakei 10:23, 24 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. Ah well, just as well to say that I don't mind if WHEELER is permitted just to go away again. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 02:53, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]