Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Kven/Proposed decision

Just want to draw attention of the arbitrators to the fact that Kven antics continue unabated. --Ghirla ^-трёп- 13:21, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. The same thing here [1] and here [2] and here [3]. --Drieakko 13:56, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page comments are good. Evidence is better. Might consider putting this information in the form of evidence if you have not done so already. --FloNight 14:04, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence section has plenty of the same stuff already. I will copy this there as well now. --Drieakko 14:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To put the long story short: the banned user insists on claiming that the small Kven minority in northern Norway used to rule a large kingdom covering the northern Fennoscandia, also playing a key part in Varangian eastern activities during the late Iron Age and early Middle Ages. This mainly consists of fictional elements by the user himself, with some selected parts taken from theories of a retired Finnish professor Kyösti Julku who claims that most of the Europeans used to speak Finnish but lost their language in favor of the Indo-European languages. --Drieakko 14:06, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Title says it all, I think. How can the probation be effectively enforced if no one but the arbitrators know who he is, and how will other editors know which Kven-user-like edits to revert and which to keep (per enforcement #1)? Thatcher131 19:31, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]