Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/IronDuke and Gnetwerker/Proposed decision

I have added several proposed principles, findings of fact, and proposed remedies on the "Workshop" page. Is it appropriate to add the headings here? (This page appears to be the sole domain of the Arbs.) -- Gnetwerker 23:23, 24 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard back on this, so I moved both IronDuke's and my various proposals of principle, fact, and remedy onto this page. I read this line "After considering /Evidence and discussing proposals with other arbitrators, parties and others at /Workshop place proposals which are ready for voting here" (emphasis added) as authorizing that. If this was wrong, please simply revert. -- Gnetwerker 18:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gnetworker, it says EXPLICITLY that only arbitrators may edit the Proposed decision page with respect to adding votes, proposals, etc. Non-arbitrators may only make spelling/grammar/formatting corrections - all other comments should be placed on the talk page. --TML1988 03:11, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am really, honestly sorry for being dense, but where does it say that? "Proposed wording to be modified by Arbitrators and then voted on." -- that, with respect, does not sound like an explicit prohibition, and an exhaustive search of the documentation on this process yielded no guidelines. Also, I asked and didn't get an answer (until I screwed up -- the law of the Internet, I guess). -- Gnetwerker 06:32, 7 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]