Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:MOVE IT Math (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the miscellaneous page below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the discussion was: keep. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 23:04, 14 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:MOVE IT Math

Also: Draft:MOVE IT Math (3)

I still don’t believe this program is notable enough to be included in mainspace. The draft looks a sort of finished and so it is unlikely that further development will make it more notable. So, the right course of action is to discontinue the development by deletion. —- Taku (talk) 07:27, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:DMFD, "drafts may be nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion (MfD), but not solely because the draft fails to show that the notability guidelines are satisfied". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:34, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per NA1000, WP:DMFD and that the draft does not have major promotional issues. Eumat114 formerly TLOM (Message) 09:21, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Keep - The nominator has not shown that the draft needs deleting. Has the nominator identified an issue, such as repeated submission, or undisclosed conflict of interest? Robert McClenon (talk) 20:02, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:MOVE IT Math. I do see a repeated submission problem, but not with the draft itself. Will the nominator please either state more clearly what they didn't explain in December, or specify what species of Salmoninae they want on their user page? Robert McClenon (talk) 20:14, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
There does seem to exist issues of (a bit of) conflict of interest as well as somehow persistent attempt to create the draft; see the talkpage. The authors of the draft obviously believe the topic should be covered in Wikipedia. I'm just not convinced; there is a lack of what makes this program distinguished, which is not something that can be added in the future, (whence this MfD). -- Taku (talk) 02:31, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:NMFD. — Godsy^(TALK_CONT) 01:12, 11 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the page's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.