Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2023 November 17

November 17

File:Hunting Woolly Mammoth.jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Whpq (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Zero evidence of any kind of permission or who the author is. The source listed is a cloud storage service, and the uploader was a student editor. Seems likely to be copyright infringement and wouldn't really be justifiable to retain under fair use. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:53, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed, Alamy shows that this is a stock photo from Dorling Kindersley [1]. Zero reason to retain the file. Hemiauchenia (talk) 01:22, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jazmin Bean logo.webp

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This is inappropriate in the article for the same reason that a fair-use image would be on a BLP. It is fundamentally replaceable because Bean is a living person who can be photographed. There might be a fair-use case if the logo were discussed in the article, but it isn't.

That said, there might be an argument that this is below the U.S. threshold of originality—would depend on how creative the shading of the letters is, I'd think. It's above the TOO in the UK, so isn't eligible for Commons, but if it's below the U.S. TOO this could be redesignated as a local public-domain file. -- Tamzin^{[cetacean needed]} (they|xe|she) 03:12, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's better to have no image in the infobox than the logo. The logo doesn't add anything, and is not really defensible by fair use. Hemiauchenia (talk) 18:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I'm fairly certain the effects put the logo above the ToO even in the United States. Ixfd64 (talk) 21:45, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Double Live cover (25th).jpg

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more files. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 25 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Not discussed critically or used for an educational purpose. Fails WP:NFCC. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:09, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the file's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.